President Trump? Stranger Things Might Happen

Political, social forces make the 2016 presidential race unpredictably interesting.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
Jan. 13, 2014, 4:21 a.m.

The ques­tion is ab­surdly pre­ma­ture, but we can’t help ourselves. Who’s go­ing to win the pres­id­ency in 2016?

“There are ba­sic­ally 50 life­times between now and then, so a lot’s go­ing to change,” Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive Dav­id Plouffe said Sunday, after re­luct­antly agree­ing with This Week host Martha Rad­datz that Demo­crat Hil­lary Clin­ton and Re­pub­lic­an Chris Christie are front-run­ners for the party nom­in­a­tions.

“I pre­dict that a year from now we’re go­ing to be talk­ing about an­oth­er can­did­ate — some oth­er can­did­ate who has lit the fire in either party,” said Mat­thew Dowd, who worked for Pres­id­ent George W. Bush, but now is an in­de­pend­ent voice on This Week.

“I agree with that, for a change,” chuckled Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive Donna Brazile.

Dowd is right. It’s far too soon to speak with au­thor­ity about the next pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, and there are many reas­ons to sus­pect that the 2016 race will be re­shaped — if not won — by a can­did­ate who’s not yet on Wash­ing­ton’s radar. Here are four factors to con­sider.

His­tory is a guide. In June 2006, the Gal­lup Poll found Clin­ton with a wide lead over oth­er 2008 pres­id­en­tial hope­fuls, while Rudy Gi­uliani held a slight lead in the GOP race. Clin­ton even­tu­ally lost to then-Sen. Barack Obama, who was not even among the 10 Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates lis­ted by Gal­lup in 2006. He was that far off the radar. Gi­uliani, of course, washed out of the GOP cam­paign soon after it ac­tu­ally began.  (That poll was taken six months deep­er in­to the 2008 cycle than today is for the 2016 cam­paign.)

In­sur­gent cam­paigns flare late. Ross Perot was a cipher two years out from the 1992 cam­paign, and nobody in 2002 con­sidered Howard Dean a ser­i­ous can­did­ate for the 2004 Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion. Neither man won, but they both put a scare in­to the es­tab­lish­ment and had a sig­ni­fic­ant im­pact on U.S. policy and polit­ics bey­ond their cam­paigns.

Voters are sick of the status quo. The pub­lic’s trust in gov­ern­ment, polit­ics, and polit­ic­al parties is at re­cord lows, ac­cord­ing to a vari­ety of polls. A re­cord-high 42 per­cent of Amer­ic­an identi­fy as polit­ic­al in­de­pend­ents, Gal­lup found this month. Re­pub­lic­an iden­ti­fic­a­tion felt to 25 per­cent, the low­est Gal­lup has meas­ured since it began con­duct­ing in­ter­views by tele­phone 25 years ago. Demo­crat­ic iden­ti­fic­a­tion is un­changed from the last four years, at 31 per­cent, but that’s the low­est an­nu­al av­er­age in a quarter-cen­tury.

The pub­lic’s hun­ger for change fueled the in­sur­gent cam­paigns of Perot, Dean, and Obama, and it could spur a new one. Wrench­ing eco­nom­ic trans­ition, new tech­no­lo­gies that em­power the masses, and the lift­ing of lim­its on cam­paign dona­tions could make a 2016 in­sur­gency swift and sur­pris­ingly po­tent.

Brands are more fra­gile than ever. Busi­nesses lead­ers are strug­gling to build and main­tain their cor­por­ate repu­ta­tions in a crowded, cyn­ic­al, and fast-chan­ging mar­ket­place of ideas. “So, this is where we find ourselves: a world in which brands can be in­cred­ibly power­ful, but more chal­len­ging and more ex­pens­ive than ever to cre­ate and main­tain, and less re­si­li­ent,” writes Jonath­an Copul­sky in Brand Re­si­li­ence: Man­aging Risk and Re­cov­ery in a High-speed World.

The same forces con­spir­ing against cor­por­ate brands are a threat to polit­ic­al repu­ta­tions, a par­tic­u­lar chal­lenge for the likes of Clin­ton (“Memo to Hil­lary Clin­ton: You’re the Prob­lem”) and Christie (“How Christie Can Save His Ca­reer”).

In­sti­tu­tion­al blur­ring could lead to cros­sov­er. The Pew Re­search Cen­ter has doc­u­mented a dec­ades-long de­cline in the pub­lic’s faith in U.S. in­sti­tu­tions, in­clud­ing busi­nesses, schools, churches, char­it­ies, me­dia or­gan­iz­a­tions, and, of course, polit­ics and gov­ern­ment. As these silos weak­en, the pub­lic will be in­creas­ingly more open to people and brands that defy in­sti­tu­tion­al bound­ar­ies. Bit­coin, for ex­ample, is a di­git­al cur­rency in­vad­ing the space of tra­di­tion­al fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions.

How might this ap­ply to polit­ics? The bar­ri­ers to entry will be lower. We’re far more likely to see a pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate emerge from out­side the tra­di­tion­al polit­ic­al com­munity. A pro­voc­at­ive thought: In our celebrity-in­fused cul­ture, why couldn’t the next game-chan­ging in­sur­gent can­did­ate — if not pres­id­ent — emerge from the world of sports or en­ter­tain­ment? Cer­tainly, the path from a cor­por­ate suite to the Oval Of­fice is less cluttered than usu­al.

Pres­id­ent Trump? No way. The Amer­ic­an pub­lic is too smart to let that hap­pen. But stranger things might.

DIS­CLOS­URE: I wrote a book in 2005 with Dowd and Demo­crat Doug Sosnik about lead­er­ship of polit­ic­al, busi­ness, and re­li­gious or­gan­iz­a­tions.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4655) }}

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.