The Cheney Brand Is Dead

Liz Cheney’s Senate campaign never gained traction in Wyoming. That’s because Republican voters stopped embracing the Bush-Cheney legacy.

Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz watch the inaugural parade from the Presidential reviewing stand in front of the White House January 20, 2005 in Washington, DC. Cheney and U.S. President George W. Bush were inaugurated for a second term earlier in the day.
National Journal
Josh Kraushaar
Jan. 6, 2014, 3:46 a.m.

There are many reas­ons why Liz Cheney’s Sen­ate cam­paign failed to get any trac­tion in Wyom­ing. As a Wash­ing­ton in­sider who spent her pro­fes­sion­al life in North­ern Vir­gin­ia, she faced in­her­ent chal­lenges run­ning an in­sur­gent cam­paign against a well-liked sen­at­or. She nev­er was able to se­cure sup­port from oth­er Re­pub­lic­an elec­ted of­fi­cials, re­ly­ing in­stead on past al­lies from the Bush-Cheney pres­id­en­tial cam­paigns. Her all-too-pub­lic fam­ily feuds were a pain­ful dis­trac­tion to run­ning an or­derly, fo­cused cam­paign.

But most sig­ni­fic­antly, Cheney found that her call­ing card in pub­lic life as a spokes­per­son for a mus­cu­lar, hawk­ish for­eign policy just wasn’t play­ing polit­ic­ally — even in a Re­pub­lic­an primary in a deeply con­ser­vat­ive state. Cheney entered the race as a go-to con­ser­vat­ive ex­pert on the Middle East, but she barely talked about for­eign policy on the cam­paign trail. Voters were more in­ter­ested in her views on gay mar­riage than her brom­ides against the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion over Benghazi.

Her drop­ping out is a sym­bol­ic nail in the coffin to the polit­ics of the Bush-Cheney ad­min­is­tra­tion, when for­eign policy trumped all and ag­gress­ive tac­tics to com­bat Is­lam­ic ex­trem­ism were ini­tially greeted with pub­lic sup­port. Now, Amer­ic­ans are treat­ing the latest eye­brow-rais­ing news that Amer­ica is con­tent to dis­en­gage from the Middle East as al Qaida re­as­serts it­self in the Middle East with a yawn. This week­end’s head­lines from The New York Times could have been fod­der for a Liz Cheney cam­paign ad rip­ping the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion for passiv­ity — a la John Mc­Cain and Lind­sey Gra­ham. In­stead, she ended her cam­paign with a whim­per. In­deed, the one area where Pres­id­ent Obama re­ceives ad­equate marks these days is on for­eign policy.

The Re­pub­lic­an party now finds it­self di­vided on na­tion­al se­cur­ity, with as­cend­ant tea-party ele­ments eager to re­buke the leg­acy of the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion. Sen. Rand Paul of Ken­tucky, a po­ten­tial pres­id­en­tial con­tender, is prais­ing NSA leak­er Ed­ward Snowden while sug­gest­ing that Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence James Clap­per serve jail time. That would have been shock­ing to hear from any Re­pub­lic­an in good stand­ing in the Bush-Cheney years. Even the most hawk­ish Re­pub­lic­ans aren’t sug­gest­ing put­ting Amer­ic­an boots on the ground in Ir­aq or Syr­ia, acutely aware of war wear­i­ness back home.

Liz Cheney didn’t struggle in the race be­cause of her for­eign policy views. But they didn’t bol­ster her cre­den­tials, either. That it­self is a sign of how much the Re­pub­lic­an Party has changed in the last dec­ade. Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates used to gain polit­ic­al trac­tion by cri­ti­ciz­ing op­pon­ents as weak on ter­ror­ism. Now those voices find them­selves lead­ing from be­hind.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×