Democrats, Fumbling No More

The party’s offensive on the Affordable Care Act continues.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Dec. 5, 2013, 10:38 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama re­cently al­lowed that on sev­er­al oc­ca­sions, he and his ad­min­is­tra­tion had “fumbled” with re­gard to the rol­lout of the Af­ford­able Care Act and sug­ges­ted it wouldn’t hap­pen again. “I am very frus­trated,” Obama said, “but I’m also some­body who, if I fumble the ball, you know, I’m go­ing to wait un­til I get the next play, and then I’m go­ing to try to run as hard as I can and do right by the team.” It ap­pears he’s mak­ing good on his word.

In the past few days, Demo­crats have taken up the of­fens­ive on the health care law, sound­ing off on the con­sequences of re­peal for the GOP as part of a three-week drive to re­fo­cus the pub­lic on the law’s be­ne­fits. Buoyed by im­prove­ments in Health­Care.Gov, the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee is tar­get­ing 60 House Re­pub­lic­ans who have cri­ti­cized the Af­ford­able Care Act, blast­ing out state­ments that tout the be­ne­fits of the le­gis­la­tion and link­ing op­pon­ents’ cri­ti­cism of the law with things like im­mun­iz­a­tions for chil­dren and cov­er­ing those with preex­ist­ing con­di­tions. Law­makers in heated races around the coun­try are get­ting in on the ac­tion as well.

In New Jer­sey’s 2nd Dis­trict, Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate Bill Hughes, who’s run­ning in a hotly con­tested race to re­place Rep. Frank Lo­Bi­ondo, called on the con­gress­man to cease his par­ti­cip­a­tion in Re­pub­lic­an at­tacks on the pres­id­ent’s health care law. “Last month, Con­gress­man Frank Lo­Bi­ondo re­peatedly voted to shut down gov­ern­ment and brought us to verge of de­fault, all to ad­vance an agenda that would take South Jer­sey back to a time when in­sur­ance com­pan­ies could deny his con­stitu­ents cov­er­age for hav­ing preex­ist­ing con­di­tions,” wrote Hughes in an email to Garden State res­id­ents. Re­pub­lic­ans’ mis­sion, Hughes con­ten­ded in his missive, is to put in­sur­ance com­pan­ies back in con­trol so that they can drop South Jer­sey fam­il­ies’ cov­er­age at a mo­ment’s no­tice.

An­oth­er blast, sent out by Pete Aguilar, the top Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate in a race to un­seat Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Gary Miller in Cali­for­nia’s 2nd Dis­trict, soun­ded a sim­il­ar tune. “The rol­lout of the Af­ford­able Care Act has not been without its prob­lems,” wrote Aguilar in a blast to voters Wed­nes­day night. “But, re­peal­ing the law is not an op­tion. We can’t go back to put­ting big in­sur­ance com­pan­ies in charge of our health, where preex­ist­ing con­di­tions would ex­clude you from cov­er­age, or where simply be­ing a wo­man would in­crease costs.”

It all soun­ded un­can­nily like the case Steve Is­rael, chair­man of the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, made on Hard­ball Wed­nes­day night when he ar­gued that House Speak­er John Boehner and fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans were will­fully mis­lead­ing the Amer­ic­an people on the ACA. In a con­ver­sa­tion with Chris Mat­thews, Is­rael summed up the new cam­paign. “They know that they can­not af­ford as Re­pub­lic­ans, polit­ic­ally, for the Af­ford­able Care Act to suc­ceed. And you know what? We’re go­ing on of­fense now. We’re go­ing to let the Amer­ic­an people know that every single Re­pub­lic­an who talks about re­peal­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act is im­pos­ing, for ex­ample, a $1,200 tax on seni­ors by re­open­ing the donut hole. So when these Re­pub­lic­ans talk about re­peal, what they’re talk­ing about is hit­ting the middle class and seni­ors in their pock­et­books.”

Per­haps the DCCC is mak­ing in­roads already. At least one Re­pub­lic­an, Rep. Scott Ri­gell in Vir­gin­ia, has ad­mit­ted the law is ac­tu­ally help­ing some people and that Re­pub­lic­ans would do bet­ter to fo­cus on mak­ing changes to the law, rather than in­sist­ing on out­right re­peal. “It’s not in dis­pute that many Amer­ic­ans’ lives are be­ing dis­rup­ted in an im­port­ant way by this law,” Ri­gell told The New York Times. “Is it also true that some Amer­ic­ans’ lives have got­ten bet­ter? Yes, and to not ac­know­ledge that is to deny real­ity.”

Be­low is an ex­ample of an email the DCCC sent to res­id­ents in Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick’s dis­trict in Pennsylvania. Sim­il­ar in­form­a­tion about preex­ist­ing con­di­tions will be sent out in five dozen Re­pub­lic­an-held dis­tricts.

#Cost­sO­fRe­peal: Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick Would Deny Cov­er­age for 5,489,162 Pennsylvani­ans With Preex­ist­ing Con­di­tions

 

Be­cause of Con­gress­man Mike Fitzpatrick’s ob­ses­sion with re­peal­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act, 129 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans ““ in­clud­ing 5,489,162 people in Pennsylvania ““ could be denied cov­er­age simply be­cause they have a preex­ist­ing con­di­tion, send­ing us back to the days when in­sur­ance com­pan­ies were free to deny care to people with everything from can­cer to dia­betes to asthma.

 

Data from the De­part­ment of Health and Hu­man Ser­vices re­veals that since 2010, up to 17 mil­lion chil­dren with pre-ex­ist­ing con­di­tions, in­clud­ing 656,877 in Pennsylvania, can no longer be denied care be­cause of their health, and be­gin­ning this Janu­ary, that pro­tec­tion will ex­tend to all adults ““ un­less Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick gets his way, send­ing us back to the old sys­tem where in­sur­ance com­pan­ies were free to deny and drop cov­er­age simply for hav­ing asthma as a child, or even get­ting strep throat.

 

“Liv­ing in a con­stant state of dread wheth­er your in­sur­ance com­pany might drop you be­cause of a preex­ist­ing con­di­tion is simply wrong, but that’s ex­actly what Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick would do to 5,489,162 Pennsylvani­ans. For all those fam­il­ies, that means Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick’s re­peal plan would rob them of their peace of mind and se­cur­ity and in­stead could drive them in­to bank­ruptcy be­cause of their health con­di­tions,” said Emily Bittner of the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. “While Demo­crats work to im­prove the law to make it work bet­ter for the Amer­ic­an people, Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick is for­ging reck­lessly ahead with his re­peal ob­ses­sion that leaves the 129 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans out in the cold simply be­cause they have preex­ist­ing con­di­tions like asthma or can­cer.”

 

BACK­GROUND

 

Re­peal Could Deny Cov­er­age to 129 Mil­lion Amer­ic­ans with Pre-Ex­ist­ing Con­di­tions, In­clud­ing 17 Mil­lion Chil­dren. “As many as 129 mil­lion non-eld­erly Amer­ic­ans have a pre-ex­ist­ing health con­di­tion that puts them at risk of be­ing denied af­ford­able cov­er­age without health care over­haul, ac­cord­ing to a gov­ern­ment re­port. The es­tim­ate rep­res­ents nearly half of Amer­ic­ans young­er than 65, and 86 per­cent of people 55 to 64 [“¦] The act already pro­hib­its in­surers from lim­it­ing life­time cov­er­age to a fixed dol­lar amount or deny­ing cov­er­age to a child young­er than 19 be­cause of a pre-ex­ist­ing con­di­tion. As many as 17 mil­lion chil­dren young­er than 18 have a pre-ex­ist­ing con­di­tion, ac­cord­ing to the re­port.” [ABC News, 1/18/11]

 

House Re­pub­lic­ans Have Voted 46 Times to Re­peal or Dis­mantle the Af­ford­able Care Act.”Re­pub­lic­an elec­ted of­fi­cials have seen the Af­ford­able Care Act as es­sen­tially un­fix­able — that’s why House Re­pub­lic­ans voted 46 times to re­peal or delay the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the law, in­stead of work­ing with the White House over the past three years to identi­fy and solve prob­lems with­in it of the sort that tend to ac­cu­mu­late in any such massive piece of le­gis­la­tion.” [The At­lantic, 11/27/13]
What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×