Parents Pitching In

In Sacramento, the school district is getting moms and dads involved, which helps their kids—and the schools.

Thinking of college: Susana Bravo (second from left) and her husband, Rodolfo Salazar, with her children, Ian and Lizzet, at either end.
Courtesy of Susana Bravo
Ted Hesson
Add to Briefcase
Ted Hesson
Jan. 27, 2016, 11:30 a.m.

When Judy Mont­gomery’s daugh­ter star­ted kinder­garten in 1984, she did what came nat­ur­ally: She joined a par­ent coun­cil at her Sac­ra­mento school. “I just star­ted vo­lun­teer­ing and tak­ing on lead­er­ship roles,” she said. “It’s what my mom did. I was raised with that—it’s what you did.”

As she guided her three chil­dren through the Cali­for­nia cap­it­al’s pub­lic schools, she pro­gressed from a vo­lun­teer to a part-time par­ent­al ad­vis­ory role that al­lowed her to serve as a li­ais­on between par­ents and the school dis­trict. Her in­volve­ment be­came more than a hobby: When she needed a job in 1996, she be­came a sev­enth-grade teach­er. After sev­en years in front of a classroom, she be­came an ad­min­is­trat­or and, in 2012, the prin­cip­al of Mat­suyama Ele­ment­ary School, where half of the stu­dents come from poor fam­il­ies.

Her unique ex­per­i­ence—from con­cerned par­ent to teach­er to prin­cip­al—made her ap­pre­ci­ate the im­port­ance of par­ent­al in­volve­ment to a school’s suc­cess. So, last fall, she jumped at the chance to join the school dis­trict’s Par­ent Lead­er­ship Path­ways pro­gram, which shows par­ents and care­givers how they can play a more act­ive role in their child’s edu­ca­tion. This is es­pe­cially use­ful at the Mat­suyama school, with a his­tory as a less di­verse, more af­flu­ent stu­dent body that can make it harder for new, non­white par­ents to feel at home.

The Sac­ra­mento City Uni­fied School Dis­trict star­ted the pro­gram in 2010 as a way to bet­ter serve par­ents while en­list­ing them as part­ners, as part of a stra­tegic plan that stressed fam­ily en­gage­ment. This was a chal­len­ging task in this ra­cially and eth­nic­ally di­verse city, where the av­er­age fam­ily earns $20,000 a year less than statewide. Among the dis­trict’s 43,000 stu­dents, 71 per­cent are poor enough to qual­i­fy for a sub­sid­ized lunch. Many stu­dents come from fam­il­ies of im­mig­rants; 38 per­cent speak a lan­guage oth­er than Eng­lish at home, primar­ily Span­ish but also Hmong, Vi­et­namese, Rus­si­an, Chinese, and more than three dozen oth­er tongues. The pro­gram of­fers par­ents a crash course of sorts, cov­er­ing everything from us­ing so­cial me­dia to nav­ig­at­ing Cali­for­nia’s sys­tem of pub­lic high­er edu­ca­tion, in 30 weekly, two-hour-long ses­sions.

“Schools can’t run without par­ents,” par­ent-turned-prin­cip­al Mont­gomery said—and the schol­ar­ship backs her up. Stud­ies have shown con­sist­ently that chil­dren with par­ents who are more in­volved per­form bet­ter aca­dem­ic­ally. Wil­li­am Jeynes, an edu­ca­tion pro­fess­or at Cali­for­nia State Uni­versity (Long Beach), looked at 77 stud­ies in­volving more than 300,000 stu­dents as part of a meta-ana­lys­is pub­lished by the Har­vard Fam­ily Re­search Pro­ject. He found that chil­dren with more-en­gaged par­ents per­formed “sub­stan­tially high­er” in school, scor­ing sev­en-tenths of a grade bet­ter than their peers with less-in­volved par­ents. That’s the dif­fer­ence between a B+ and an A.

From the stand­point of child de­vel­op­ment, par­ent­al in­volve­ment mat­ters for sev­er­al reas­ons, ac­cord­ing to Nancy Hill, a de­vel­op­ment­al psy­cho­lo­gist and pro­fess­or of edu­ca­tion at the Har­vard Gradu­ate School of Edu­ca­tion. First and fore­most, par­ents or care­givers rep­res­ent a sta­bil­iz­ing force in a child’s life. Bey­ond that, by vo­lun­teer­ing at a school, par­tic­u­larly at the ele­ment­ary level, par­ents can find out how the school func­tions and make im­port­ant con­tacts with­in the build­ing. They can also watch their child in the classroom and gauge her or his style of learn­ing. When par­ents un­der­stand what’s hap­pen­ing at school, they can ap­ply the same ex­pect­a­tions and rules at home—a “com­mon lan­guage,” in Hill’s words.

For many par­ents and care­givers, spend­ing time at school isn’t easy. Someone work­ing two jobs might be hard-pressed to de­vote an even­ing a week to school activ­it­ies. Par­ents who don’t speak Eng­lish may feel in­tim­id­ated or simply un­able to com­mu­nic­ate with the school staff. In some Lat­in Amer­ic­an cul­tures, Hill noted, a par­ent who ex­presses con­cern to a teach­er might be con­sidered rude.

Re­gard­less of these im­ped­i­ments, it’s im­port­ant that schools try to get par­ents in­volved, ex­perts say, and in a way that re­flects the di­versity of the stu­dent body. Too of­ten, the same par­ents vo­lun­teer for everything, Hill said—“and then you have sys­tem­at­ic­ally left out en­tire voices, or even some­times en­tire sub­pop­u­la­tions.”

The Sac­ra­mento cur­riculum for par­ents is split in­to three courses—“Emer­ging,” “Learn­ing,” and “Lead­ing”—each re­quir­ing par­ents to at­tend weekly ses­sions for 10 weeks. The first level be­gins with some ba­sic yet vi­tal con­cepts such as main­tain­ing open com­mu­nic­a­tion between par­ents and chil­dren. The middle course ex­plains the Com­mon Core stand­ards, which Cali­for­nia ad­op­ted in 2010, and how to keep tabs on­line on their child’s per­form­ance, among oth­er top­ics. The last course pre­pares par­ents for lead­er­ship roles in the dis­trict, teach­ing them how to en­list the sup­port of oth­er par­ents and to or­gan­ize pro­jects in their school. Par­ents also learn how to fa­cil­it­ate a meet­ing, ana­lyze data, and un­der­stand the nu­ances of group dy­nam­ics.

The goal of the fi­nal set of classes is to dis­cov­er com­munity lead­ers who can help the schools and their ad­min­is­tra­tion. School of­fi­cials hope to en­cour­age par­ents to “build that con­fid­ence so that they can run for some sort of po­s­i­tion,” said Tu Moua-Car­roz, an as­sist­ant su­per­in­tend­ent who over­sees the ef­fort. Some of the roughly 400 par­ents who en­roll in the pro­gram each year will wind up on a school site coun­cil or in a lead­er­ship role in a Par­ent Teach­er As­so­ci­ation or a sim­il­ar group. The courses can also serve as a place for im­mig­rants to prac­tice their Eng­lish.

Susana Bravo, a 46-year-old Mex­ic­an im­mig­rant with two chil­dren in the Sac­ra­mento pub­lic school sys­tem, raves about the pro­gram, which she com­pleted last spring. She knew little of how the Amer­ic­an edu­ca­tion sys­tem func­tioned when she moved from Guadala­jara to Sac­ra­mento in 2004. After com­plet­ing all three tiers of the train­ing, she says she feels more com­fort­able speak­ing in pub­lic and now has bet­ter re­la­tion­ships with her chil­dren’s teach­ers. On­line, she learned how to enter the dis­trict’s stu­dent-per­form­ance portal, In­fin­ite Cam­pus, so she could stay a step ahead of her chil­dren. A side be­ne­fit of the train­ing ses­sions is meet­ing oth­er par­ents, so she knows people who might pick up her chil­dren in an emer­gency.

Bravo’s son and daugh­ter, Ian and Lizz­et, are in the sev­enth and eighth grade, re­spect­ively, but thanks to the pro­gram, she’s already think­ing about col­lege. The cur­riculum in­cludes a trip to a cam­pus in each of the state’s three sys­tems of pub­lic high­er edu­ca­tion—the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia, Cali­for­nia State Uni­versity, and the com­munity col­leges. Ian, who has a learn­ing dis­ab­il­ity, hadn’t been in­ter­ested in go­ing to col­lege, but a vis­it to Cali­for­nia State’s Sac­ra­mento cam­pus changed his out­look. “He really liked it when he vis­ited the classrooms,” his moth­er re­called. “When he saw that the teach­ers spoke Span­ish, he told me, ‘Mom, I can see my­self be­ing here.’”

Par­ent Lead­er­ship Path­ways also provides re­sources, such as work­shops on fin­an­cial aid and fin­an­cial lit­er­acy, that ex­plain how she can help pay for her chil­dren’s edu­ca­tion. Her daugh­ter wants to go to col­lege too, but Bravo wor­ries about how to af­ford it. “The pro­gram has helped us un­der­stand that there are ways to get help,” she said, “that we’re not alone.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump’s Sanctuary Cities Order Blocked
7 hours ago
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
7 hours ago

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
8 hours ago

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

DC Area To Experience Terror Attack Drill Wednesday Morning
8 hours ago

The Washington, D.C. area will undergo "a full-scale exercise" Wednesday morning "designed to prepare for the possibility of a complex coordinated terror attack in the National Capital Region." The drill will take place at six different sites throughout the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. The drill should not be taken as a sign that emergency services are expecting an attack, said Scott Boggs, Managing Director of Homeland Security and Public Safety at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.

Inauguration Committee Admits to Faulty Donor Records
9 hours ago

The Presidential Inaugural Committee "acknowledged late Monday that a final report it filed with the Federal Election Commission this month was riddled with errors, many of which were first identified through a crowdsourced data project at HuffPost." The committee raised about $100 million for the festivities, but the 500-page FEC report, which detailed where that money came from, was riddled with problems. The likely culprit: a system of access codes sent out by the GOP's ticketing system. Those codes were then often passed around on the secondary market.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.