No Perfect Political Weapon

A new poll tests voters’ attitudes about two key 2014 topics: Obamacare and the economy.

National Journal
Charlie Cook
April 10, 2014, 5 p.m.

Any­one who knows me well knows I am usu­ally eye­ing the oven for the next fresh batch of in-depth pub­lic-opin­ion data from Demo­cracy Corps, a part­ner­ship between le­gendary Demo­crat­ic strategists Stan Green­berg and James Carville that just cel­eb­rated its 15th an­niversary. It gets even bet­ter when the two team up with Re­sur­gent Re­pub­lic, cofoun­ded by vet­er­an GOP poll­ster Whit Ayres, as they did to craft a na­tion­al sur­vey of 840 likely 2014 voters (in­clud­ing 50 per­cent reached on cel­lu­lar phones) con­duc­ted by Green­berg Quin­lan Ros­ner Re­search. The sur­vey was con­duc­ted March 19-23 for NPR, and it probed voters’ at­ti­tudes on the Af­ford­able Care Act, the state of the eco­nomy, and their choices in Novem­ber.

Not sur­pris­ingly, Demo­cracy Corps and Re­sur­gent Re­pub­lic touted the poll’s re­lease with broadly di­ver­gent memos: The Demo­crats’ head­line read, “Be Care­ful Ac­cept­ing Con­ven­tion­al Wis­dom on the Af­ford­able Care Act and 2014 Be­ing a Re­pub­lic­an Year,” while Re­pub­lic­ans saw “Early Signs of An­oth­er Re­pub­lic­an Midterm Wave.” There is some glass-half-full/glass-half-empty men­tal­ity in­her­ent in such a col­lab­or­at­ive ef­fort. But in my ex­per­i­ence, giv­en the track re­cord of the re­search or­gan­iz­a­tions in­volved, this is very high-qual­ity stuff, and you can pretty much take the num­bers them­selves to the bank.

Some of the sur­vey’s most in­triguing find­ings were mes­sage tests on the Af­ford­able Care Act and the eco­nomy, with one set of mes­sages writ­ten by the Demo­crats and one set writ­ten by the Re­pub­lic­ans. The find­ings should give both sides pause: Just as the Af­ford­able Care Act may not be the uni­ver­sally deadly weapon most Re­pub­lic­ans seem to think it is, fo­cus­ing on the eco­nomy and a min­im­um-wage hike may not be the sal­va­tion many Demo­crats seem to think it could be.

On the ACA, the sur­vey gave voters a choice between two state­ments, one from a Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate and one from a Re­pub­lic­an. The Demo­crat’s state­ment read: “The health care law is a start, but it’s not per­fect. We need to make it work for small busi­nesses and get costs down”¦. Re­peal­ing it with more polit­ic­al fight­ing will hurt a lot of people.” The Re­pub­lic­an’s said: “Obama­care is hurt­ing more people than it’s help­ing”¦. It’s time to pass health care re­form that lowers costs and al­lows the people — not the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment or in­sur­ance com­pan­ies — to con­trol their own health care.”

The res­ults of the sur­vey showed that likely voters pre­ferred the Demo­crat­ic mes­sage 49 per­cent to 44 per­cent. On the ba­sic ques­tion “Do you sup­port or op­pose the health care re­form law that passed in 2010, also known as the Af­ford­able Care Act or Obama­care?” 51 per­cent said they op­posed it and just 47 per­cent said they sup­por­ted it. But, as Carville and Green­berg point out, on the fol­low-up ques­tion to op­pon­ents which read, “Would you say you op­pose the health care re­form law be­cause it goes too far “¦ or be­cause it doesn’t go far enough?” 7 per­cent picked “doesn’t go far enough,” the­or­et­ic­ally bring­ing die-hard op­pos­i­tion to the ACA down to 44 per­cent.

On the eco­nomy, voters chose between a Demo­crat­ic state­ment: “The eco­nomy is re­cov­er­ing, but not for reg­u­lar hard­work­ing people”¦. We must raise the min­im­um wage “¦ and stop un­fair trade agree­ments that wipe out Amer­ic­an jobs”; and a Re­pub­lic­an state­ment: “The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has had six years to get this eco­nomy go­ing and their policies haven’t worked”¦. It’s time to pro­duce more en­ergy here at home, and edu­cate people for the jobs of the 21st cen­tury.” An­oth­er in­ter­est­ing res­ult: By 48 per­cent to 46 per­cent, voters chose the GOP’s mes­sage.

On the sur­face, noth­ing about the top lines would sug­gest that Demo­crats are headed for a bath in Novem­ber. On the ques­tion, “If the elec­tion for U.S. Con­gress were held today, would you be vot­ing for the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate or the Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate?” the bal­lot was vir­tu­ally tied, with Demo­crats at 44 per­cent and Re­pub­lic­ans at 43 per­cent.

The real prob­lems for Demo­crats lie be­low the top lines. In fact, they are threefold.

First, as even Green­berg and Carville ac­know­ledged, Re­pub­lic­ans were 7 per­cent­age points more likely than Demo­crats to say they are cer­tain to vote this Novem­ber. Second, while Demo­crats’ na­tion­al stand­ing in this poll is mid­dling at best, the most com­pet­it­ive Sen­ate and House elec­tions this fall will be tak­ing place on much less fa­vor­able ter­rain, thanks to both GOP re­dis­trict­ing in the House and Sen­ate Demo­crats’ ex­traordin­ary ex­pos­ure after their wild suc­cess six years ago. In these red states and dis­tricts, the makeup of the elect­or­ate is a far cry from this sur­vey’s 37 per­cent Dem/31 per­cent GOP voter break­down.

Third, Demo­crats are a wreck with in­de­pend­ents, who make up a third of all sur­vey re­spond­ents and an even great­er share in com­pet­it­ive states and dis­tricts. In­de­pend­ents dis­ap­proved of Obama’s job per­form­ance by 61 per­cent to 35 per­cent (com­pared with 51 per­cent/46 per­cent over­all), chose the GOP’s mes­sage on health care by 50 per­cent to 43 per­cent, and backed the GOP’s eco­nom­ic mes­sage by a whop­ping 57 per­cent to 35 per­cent. Amaz­ingly, they even dis­ap­proved of Demo­crats’ job per­form­ance as the ma­jor­ity party in the Sen­ate (76 per­cent dis­ap­prove/18 per­cent ap­prove) more than they dis­ap­proved of Re­pub­lic­ans’ per­form­ance in the House (72 per­cent dis­ap­prove, 23 per­cent ap­prove).

The only sil­ver lin­ing for Demo­crats among in­de­pend­ents at this point is that their skep­ti­cism hasn’t yet hardened in­to a firm choice for Novem­ber. On the con­gres­sion­al-bal­lot ques­tion, Demo­crat­ic voters sup­por­ted the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate by 93 per­cent to 4 per­cent; Re­pub­lic­ans sup­por­ted the GOP can­did­ate by 89 per­cent to 4 per­cent. In­de­pend­ents broke for Re­pub­lic­ans by a 16-point mar­gin, 45 per­cent to 29 per­cent, but those num­bers also mean that more than a quarter haven’t yet made up their minds.

Does the po­ten­tial for a GOP wave ex­ist? Sur­vey says: Yes. But is there ample time for Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates to screw up their stand­ing with a large pool of un­de­cided in­de­pend­ents? Of course there is.

The Cook Political Report House Editor David Wasserman contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
HE ‘WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT’
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

FIRST CHANGE IN FOUR DECADES
Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

Source:
NO MORE INDEPENDENT VOTERS?
GOP Could Double Number of Early Primaries
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."

Source:
LEVERAGE
Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Source:
EFFECTIVE NEXT MONTH
House GOP Changes Rules for Spending Measures
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Speaker Paul Ryan is changing the rules of how the House will consider spending measures to try to prevent Democrats from offering surprise amendments that have recently put the GOP on defense. ... Ryan announced at a House GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning that members will now have to submit their amendments ahead of time so that they are pre-printed in the Congressional Record, according to leadership aides." The change will take effect after the Memorial Day recess.

Source:
×