How Not to Interpret Tonight’s Primary Results

Rep. Mark Takano, D-Calif.
©2014 Richard A. Bloom
Scott Bland
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
June 3, 2014, 7:45 a.m.

Rep. Scott Peters (D-CA-52) could per­form an odd trick over the next few months: lose his primary but win the gen­er­al elec­tion. How? Cali­for­nia’s all-party primary of­fers a tempt­ing op­por­tun­ity to com­pare can­did­ates ahead of the gen­er­al elec­tion, but the Golden State has a track re­cord of spit­ting out very dif­fer­ent res­ults in June and Novem­ber.

— In 2012, nearly every Demo­crat­ic House can­did­ate matched against a Re­pub­lic­an in Cali­for­nia im­proved on their party’s primary vote share in the gen­er­al elec­tion. (See the res­ults in graph­ic­al form here.) That in­cludes 8 dis­tricts, like Rep. Mark Takano‘s (D), where Demo­crats got less than half of the primary vote but went on to win the gen­er­al. Takano got 59% in CA-41 after he and an­oth­er Demo­crat com­bined for just 46% in the primary — lead­ing some fore­casters in DC and Cali­for­nia to down­grade Takano’s chances after he won the nom­in­a­tion.

— The 2012 res­ults con­firm the trend from Cali­for­nia’s pre­vi­ous two all-party primar­ies, in 1998 and 2000. In those years, Demo­crats im­proved their stand­ing in 66 House races between primary and gen­er­al, while Re­pub­lic­ans only did it 17 times — mostly by mar­gin­al amounts in seats that were safely Demo­crat­ic.

— Young people and es­pe­cially Lati­nos are far less likely to turn out in Cali­for­nia’s primar­ies, push­ing the res­ults away from what they look like with a full elect­or­ate in the fall. It’s the same ef­fect that hurts Demo­crat­ic per­form­ance in midterms versus pres­id­en­tial elec­tions.

That’s not to say Cali­for­nia Dems like Peters shouldn’t be wor­ried about Novem­ber; he and oth­ers will have tough races. But no one should use Tues­day’s primary res­ults to write them off. Even though they match up po­ten­tial op­pon­ents early on, all-party primar­ies are not as use­ful for com­par­ing can­did­ates as they seem.

— Scott Bland

What We're Following See More »
New Survey Shows Clinton Up 9 in Pennsylvania
8 hours ago

If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."

Obama Library Heading to Jackson Park in Chicago
8 hours ago

"President Barack Obama has chosen Jackson Park, a lakefront park that once hosted the world’s fair on the city’s South Side, for his $500 million presidential library, according to a person familiar with the matter."

Democrats Beat Republicans in Convention Ratings So Far
8 hours ago

Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."

How Many VIPs Were the Secret Service Protecting in Philly Last Night?
10 hours ago

Seven, according to an official Secret Service tweet.

Candidates’ Code Names Revealed
11 hours ago

The Clintons will retain their Secret Service "code names from the last time they lived in the White House. Hillary Clinton is EVERGREEN and Bill ClintonEAGLE. Donald Trump is MOGUL, according to reports, and Melania Trump MUSE. The vice presidents get code names, too: Mike Pence is HOOSIER—a little on the nose—and his wife HUMMINGBIRD. Tim Kaine is DAREDEVIL, somewhat ambitiously. His wife's? To be determined."