Democrats Meddling in North Carolina Republican Primary

New ad mimics tactics that Democrats used to boost Todd Akin in 2012 Senate primary.

Thom Tillis (R) North Carolina during an interview at Roll Call in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
April 16, 2014, 7 a.m.

Demo­crats are get­ting in­volved in the North Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­an primary, a sign that the party is hop­ing to en­cour­age GOP voters to nom­in­ate weak­er can­did­ates in closely con­tested primar­ies.

A new ad from the Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC tar­gets the Tar­heel State’s GOP front-run­ner, state House Speak­er Thom Tillis, whom both parties re­gard as the only Re­pub­lic­an run­ning who can de­feat Demo­crat­ic Sen. Kay Hagan. The 30-second spot, backed by an ad buy worth nearly $1 mil­lion (news first re­por­ted by The Wash­ing­ton Post), cites two resig­na­tions of top Tillis aides for con­duct­ing ex­tramar­it­al af­fairs with lob­by­ists.

The tim­ing and lan­guage of the spot ap­pears tar­geted spe­cific­ally at Re­pub­lic­an primary voters. The ac­cus­a­tion of sexu­al mis­con­duct, not to men­tion pub­lic cor­rup­tion, is de­signed to res­on­ate with evan­gel­ic­al voters, a ma­jor vot­ing bloc among North Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­ans. And the ad’s fi­nal words are de­signed to ques­tion Tillis’s fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive cre­den­tials.

“Thom Tillis: Spend­ing our money to clean up his mess,” the nar­rat­or says.

{{third­PartyEmbed type:you­tube id:SPUY5vv5W-Q}}

Tillis is ra­cing to­ward North Car­o­lina’s May 6 primary, hop­ing to reach the 40 per­cent threshold ne­ces­sary to avoid a costly run­off against one of his Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ents. In the last month, he’s re­ceived the back­ing of two pil­lars of the Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment, Amer­ic­an Cross­roads and the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce, both of which hope to help him win the primary out­right.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC’s in­volve­ment looks like a counter to their ef­forts. One Re­pub­lic­an strategist track­ing the race called it a “very cal­ib­rated” ac­tion to speak to GOP primary voters in hopes of get­ting them to vote for someone else in the primary. Oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans were more blunt about the op­pos­i­tion party’s move.

“Harry Re­id and far-left lib­er­als hit the pan­ic but­ton yes­ter­day,” said Jordan Shaw, Tillis’s cam­paign man­ager. “They have giv­en up on prop­ping up Kay Hagan, and they know their only chance at vic­tory is med­dling in the Re­pub­lic­an primary. It won’t work.”

A spokes­man for Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC didn’t im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment.

Demo­crats have played in GOP primar­ies be­fore, most not­ably in Mis­souri in 2012, when the party ran ads boost­ing GOP Rep. Todd Akin. The Re­pub­lic­an con­gress­man won the nom­in­a­tion and in­fam­ously went on to lose the red-state race after sug­gest­ing wo­men’s bod­ies can pre­vent preg­nancy after be­ing raped.

The suc­cess of that strategy last time led many ana­lysts to spec­u­late the party would again at­tempt to in­flu­ence Re­pub­lic­an races, not­ably in states with con­ten­tious primar­ies like North Car­o­lina and Geor­gia. So far, Demo­crats have been re­luct­ant to do so for fear of wast­ing valu­able re­sources. But the North Car­o­lina spot would seem to be de­signed to hurt Tillis in a primary while in­ject­ing a po­ten­tially dam­aging is­sue in­to the race that could also hurt him in a gen­er­al elec­tion.

Up­date, 1 p.m.:

A Demo­crat in­volved in the race dis­putes that the new ad is tan­tamount to the party med­dling in a GOP primary. The ad’s con­tent, the source adds, is not a new is­sue and would be just as ef­fect­ive de­fin­ing Tillis for a gen­er­al elec­tion as a primary. 

“This is an is­sue that has been raised widely by the news me­dia, or­gan­iz­a­tions, people across the state, and even Re­pub­lic­ans and will con­tin­ue to be a de­fin­ing is­sue among voters across the state for Speak­er Tillis,” said the source. 

What We're Following See More »
THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
52 minutes ago

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
1 hours ago

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
9 hours ago

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
9 hours ago

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
9 hours ago

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”