Ten years ago, National Journal’s vote ratings showed John Kerry to be the Senate’s most liberal member. Some called the rating unfair, but conservatives were gleeful that someone else had so labeled the Democratic nominee for president. President Bush even mentioned Kerry’s rating during their second 2004 presidential debate, describing it as “the award he won from the National Journal.”
This year, the vote ratings of another Massachusetts Democrat are eye-catching, but for the opposite reason. Elizabeth Warren, the newest liberal icon, is not the most liberal member of the Senate, according to this year’s National Journal vote ratings. Warren’s composite liberal score of 73.2 places her as the 31st-most-liberal senator. How could that be?
For starters, she broke with President Obama on a very significant piece of legislation, voting to repeal Obamacare’s medical-device tax — a core element to the funding of the Affordable Care Act. Many manufacturers are based in Massachusetts, so this is an instance of her voting her constituency over her party. She didn’t stop there, joining with many Republicans to “repeal or reduce the estate tax” if done in a fiscally responsible way. Warren even irked consumer advocates by opposing a measure that would have allowed states to mandate labeling of foods that contain genetically modified ingredients. Those differences gave her a liberal percentile score of 75 on economic policy.
Another reason that Warren didn’t stand out is that many of her lesser-known colleagues are also very liberal — part of the very polarization that we write about in this week’s National Journal cover story. By taking one small vote against her leadership, her ranking drops considerably because so many Senate Democrats have held a liberal line.
On foreign policy, Warren received a liberal percentile score of 54. In that area, Warren took the conservative position on just one vote, voting with almost every Senate Republican against an amendment to limit the legal rights of Guantanamo detainees brought to the United States (vote number 238). How could Warren get such a moderate score when she voted with Republicans just once? Answer: When Senators vote in lockstep, small differences in voting records can have a large impact on percentile scores. And with nearly 30 senators racking up perfect liberal voting records on foreign policy, the highest liberal percentile score any of them received was a 71.
On social issues, Warren lived up to her reputation, tying with 26 other Democratic senators as the most liberal. Warren and well-known liberals such as Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., all received a score of 73 — the most liberal score any senator got in that category.
Josh Kraushaar contributed
What We're Following See More »
“A bill headed for President Barack Obama this week includes a provision that would ban U.S. imports of fish caught by slaves in Southeast Asia, gold mined by children in Africa and garments sewn by abused women in Bangladesh, closing a loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law.” The Senate approved the bill, which would also ban Internet taxes and overhaul trade laws, by a vote of 75-20. It now goes to President Obama.
Bernie Sanders has closed to within seven points of Hillary Clinton in a new Morning Consult survey. Clinton leads 46%-39%. Consistent with the New Hampshire voting results, Clinton does best with retirees, while Sanders leads by 20 percentage points among those under 30. On the Republican side, Donald Trump is far ahead with 44% support. Trailing by a huge margin are Ted Cruz (17%), Ben Carson (10%) and Marco Rubio (10%).
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.