Democrats Divided on How to Recover from Obamacare

Former Clinton pollster Stan Greenberg argues Obamacare could be a political winner. Other Democratic strategists are more nervous.

National Journal
Alex Roarty
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
Dec. 13, 2013, midnight

How much should Demo­crats worry about Obama­care polit­ics in 2014? Even the party’s top polit­ic­al minds can’t agree.

On Thursday, seni­or Demo­crat­ic poll­ster Stan Green­berg told re­port­ers that the Re­pub­lic­an fo­cus on hit­ting Demo­crats over Obama­care was a polit­ic­al “trap.” Cit­ing a new Demo­cracy Corps poll he helped con­duct, Green­berg said if Re­pub­lic­an dwell on re­peal­ing the law while Demo­crats fo­cus on fix­ing the eco­nomy, Demo­crats will come out on top.

“I know there is an ini­tial op­por­tun­ity in go­ing after the rol­lout “¦ I would ar­gue this is a trap,” he said. “The more they’re on this, the more voters say they’re just part of this ex­treme par­tis­an grid­lock [in Con­gress], and they’re not ad­dress­ing the eco­nomy and jobs.”

Green­berg ac­know­ledged the law’s troubled rol­lout had cost Pres­id­ent Obama and his party, and that, on a sub­stant­ive level, the law needed to per­form bet­ter. But his bot­tom-line as­sess­ment soun­ded like a re­l­at­ively san­guine one: Don’t worry, Demo­crats, you can win this fight aganst a still deeply un­pop­u­lar Re­pub­lic­an Party.

But oth­er Demo­crat­ic strategists aren’t so calm. Mary Landrieu’s cam­paign, for ex­ample, began air­ing a well-fun­ded, tightly fo­cused TV spot high­light­ing her ef­fort to change the health care law by let­ting people re­tain their cur­rent health in­sur­ance. The ad was a re­flec­tion of the sen­at­or’s de­clin­ing pop­ular­ity, which has taken a hit lately over the health care law.

Her ac­tions open a win­dow in­to how oth­er Demo­crat­ic poll­sters re­gard the law. They’re not pan­icked yet, but they are con­cerned. And they’re telling oth­er Demo­crats, es­pe­cially those fa­cing re-elec­tion next year, to start pre­par­ing them­selves now.

“Dis­miss­ing it is, to me, a sign of fool­ish­ness,” said Mark Mell­man, a lead­ing Demo­crat­ic poll­ster who is work­ing for Landrieu. “Hav­ing said that, ob­sess­ing over it is a sign of fool­ish­ness. Neither is jus­ti­fied in my view.”

In private con­ver­sa­tions, the split between the two op­pos­ing view­points grows even wider. The dis­agree­ment isn’t so much about the dam­age already done: Every­one knows the party took a hit the last two months. What they don’t agree on is the path back. Some Demo­crats, like Green­berg, be­lieve the path out of the polit­ic­al dog­house is re­l­at­ively straight­for­ward. Bang the Re­pub­lic­ans for their un­pop­u­lar in­sist­ence on re­peal­ing the law, and hope the GOP fumbles its own re­sponse.

Re­mem­ber the mo­ment last cycle when Demo­crats told you we had 2012 in the bank be­cause of the [Rep. Paul] Ry­an [budget] plan?” said one Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive. “And then Re­pub­lic­ans, know­ing they needed to re­spond, came back with their phony 700 mil­lion cut ar­gu­ment to help neu­ter the is­sue? Wel­come back to that mo­ment.”

As Green­berg’s polling sug­ges­ted, there’s evid­ence for this view. Ma­jor­it­ies of adults want to fix or re­tain the Af­ford­able Care Act in­stead of re­peal­ing it. And Re­pub­lic­ans, while talk­ing about em­phas­iz­ing a mes­sage oth­er than out­right re­peal, have struggled to do so amid back­lash from the con­ser­vat­ive base.

But it’s not that easy, say oth­er strategists. For one, in some of the 2014 battle­grounds, re­peal is the more pop­u­lar op­tion among a con­ser­vat­ive-lean­ing elect­or­ate. And dis­miss­ing Obama­care isn’t so easy, either. As one strategist put it, the Ry­an budget was a pro­pos­al that nev­er passed, while Obama­care is mak­ing real changes in the coun­try’s health care sys­tem. And those changes won’t stop be­fore Elec­tion Day.

“To say it’s not a wound is silly,” said the Demo­crat­ic strategist. “It is a wound.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4623) }}

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
8 hours ago
THE LATEST
×