Democrats Divided on How to Recover from Obamacare

Former Clinton pollster Stan Greenberg argues Obamacare could be a political winner. Other Democratic strategists are more nervous.

National Journal
Alex Roarty
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
Dec. 13, 2013, midnight

How much should Demo­crats worry about Obama­care polit­ics in 2014? Even the party’s top polit­ic­al minds can’t agree.

On Thursday, seni­or Demo­crat­ic poll­ster Stan Green­berg told re­port­ers that the Re­pub­lic­an fo­cus on hit­ting Demo­crats over Obama­care was a polit­ic­al “trap.” Cit­ing a new Demo­cracy Corps poll he helped con­duct, Green­berg said if Re­pub­lic­an dwell on re­peal­ing the law while Demo­crats fo­cus on fix­ing the eco­nomy, Demo­crats will come out on top.

“I know there is an ini­tial op­por­tun­ity in go­ing after the rol­lout “¦ I would ar­gue this is a trap,” he said. “The more they’re on this, the more voters say they’re just part of this ex­treme par­tis­an grid­lock [in Con­gress], and they’re not ad­dress­ing the eco­nomy and jobs.”

Green­berg ac­know­ledged the law’s troubled rol­lout had cost Pres­id­ent Obama and his party, and that, on a sub­stant­ive level, the law needed to per­form bet­ter. But his bot­tom-line as­sess­ment soun­ded like a re­l­at­ively san­guine one: Don’t worry, Demo­crats, you can win this fight aganst a still deeply un­pop­u­lar Re­pub­lic­an Party.

But oth­er Demo­crat­ic strategists aren’t so calm. Mary Landrieu’s cam­paign, for ex­ample, began air­ing a well-fun­ded, tightly fo­cused TV spot high­light­ing her ef­fort to change the health care law by let­ting people re­tain their cur­rent health in­sur­ance. The ad was a re­flec­tion of the sen­at­or’s de­clin­ing pop­ular­ity, which has taken a hit lately over the health care law.

Her ac­tions open a win­dow in­to how oth­er Demo­crat­ic poll­sters re­gard the law. They’re not pan­icked yet, but they are con­cerned. And they’re telling oth­er Demo­crats, es­pe­cially those fa­cing re-elec­tion next year, to start pre­par­ing them­selves now.

“Dis­miss­ing it is, to me, a sign of fool­ish­ness,” said Mark Mell­man, a lead­ing Demo­crat­ic poll­ster who is work­ing for Landrieu. “Hav­ing said that, ob­sess­ing over it is a sign of fool­ish­ness. Neither is jus­ti­fied in my view.”

In private con­ver­sa­tions, the split between the two op­pos­ing view­points grows even wider. The dis­agree­ment isn’t so much about the dam­age already done: Every­one knows the party took a hit the last two months. What they don’t agree on is the path back. Some Demo­crats, like Green­berg, be­lieve the path out of the polit­ic­al dog­house is re­l­at­ively straight­for­ward. Bang the Re­pub­lic­ans for their un­pop­u­lar in­sist­ence on re­peal­ing the law, and hope the GOP fumbles its own re­sponse.

Re­mem­ber the mo­ment last cycle when Demo­crats told you we had 2012 in the bank be­cause of the [Rep. Paul] Ry­an [budget] plan?” said one Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive. “And then Re­pub­lic­ans, know­ing they needed to re­spond, came back with their phony 700 mil­lion cut ar­gu­ment to help neu­ter the is­sue? Wel­come back to that mo­ment.”

As Green­berg’s polling sug­ges­ted, there’s evid­ence for this view. Ma­jor­it­ies of adults want to fix or re­tain the Af­ford­able Care Act in­stead of re­peal­ing it. And Re­pub­lic­ans, while talk­ing about em­phas­iz­ing a mes­sage oth­er than out­right re­peal, have struggled to do so amid back­lash from the con­ser­vat­ive base.

But it’s not that easy, say oth­er strategists. For one, in some of the 2014 battle­grounds, re­peal is the more pop­u­lar op­tion among a con­ser­vat­ive-lean­ing elect­or­ate. And dis­miss­ing Obama­care isn’t so easy, either. As one strategist put it, the Ry­an budget was a pro­pos­al that nev­er passed, while Obama­care is mak­ing real changes in the coun­try’s health care sys­tem. And those changes won’t stop be­fore Elec­tion Day.

“To say it’s not a wound is silly,” said the Demo­crat­ic strategist. “It is a wound.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4623) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
23 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.