The Socio-Economic Geography of Cancer

Being poor can affect the type of cancer you get.

A close up of cancer cells in the cervix.
National Journal
John Metcalfe, City Lab
See more stories about...
John Metcalfe, City Lab
May 27, 2014, 6:51 a.m.

We know that be­ing poor can make you sick. New re­search provides more evid­ence of this dis­mal link spe­cific­ally for can­cer: Liv­ing in poverty, it seems, is as­so­ci­ated with a high­er risk of con­tract­ing the kind of tu­mors that will kill you.

That’s the con­clu­sion of sci­ent­ists who’ve in­vest­ig­ated al­most 3 mil­lion ma­lig­nant tu­mors dia­gnosed in 16 states as well as the Los Angeles area ““ what they as­sert is the “most com­pre­hens­ive as­sess­ment of the re­la­tion­ship between SES (so­cioeco­nom­ic status) and can­cer in­cid­ence for the United States.” Over­all, they found no cor­rel­a­tion between how poor or rich you are and how likely you are to get can­cer. But drilling down in­to the census tracts with high­er poverty rates, they no­ticed a pre­val­ence of can­cers with low in­cid­ence and high mor­tal­ity rates. Wealth­i­er neigh­bor­hoods were marked by can­cers of high in­cid­ence, but low mor­tal­ity rates. As the lead re­search­er, Fran­cis Bos­coe at the New York State Can­cer Re­gistry, ex­plains: “When it comes to can­cer, the poor are more likely to die of the dis­ease while the af­flu­ent are more likely to die with the dis­ease.”

Out of 39 types of can­cer, 14 showed a pos­it­ive as­so­ci­ation with poverty, the re­search­ers said in their study (which was partly sup­por­ted by the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion). Poor neigh­bor­hoods were more likely to see can­cers of the larynx, cer­vix, liv­er, and penis, as well as Ka­posi sar­coma. They were also tied to an up­tick in can­cers re­lated to to­bacco use and hu­man papil­lo­mavir­us. Rich­er areas, mean­while, suffered more from melan­oma and oth­er skin af­flic­tions, and can­cers of the thyroid and testes.

What’s to ac­count for these dif­fer­ences? Though race might play a part in the grand scheme of can­cer, it’s not ap­plic­able to what the re­search­ers meas­ured in this ex­per­i­ment. “The SES ef­fects we re­port are in­de­pend­ent of race, as race was ad­jus­ted for in the ana­lys­is,” they say. Rather, there could be be­ha­vi­or­al and eco­nom­ic things at play here, such as sub­stance use and ac­cess to med­ic­al care, ac­cord­ing to the study:

In gen­er­al, can­cer sites as­so­ci­ated with be­ha­vi­or­al risk factors such as to­bacco, al­co­hol and in­tra­ven­ous drug use, sexu­al trans­mis­sion, and poor diet tend to be as­so­ci­ated with high­er poverty. In con­trast, can­cer sites as­so­ci­ated with over­dia­gnos­is are as­so­ci­ated with lower poverty, not­ably skin, thyroid, and pro­state. Over­dia­gnos­is refers to the clin­ic­al de­tec­tion of asymp­to­mat­ic tu­mors, of­ten through ad­vanced med­ic­al tech­no­logy, that would oth­er­wise re­main un­detec­ted and un­coun­ted.

For a break­down of the can­cers that are dia­gnosed in poor and rich neigh­bor­hoods, have a look at this graph the re­search­ers made for four poverty levels us­ing data from the 2005-2009 Amer­ic­an Com­munity Sur­vey. The af­flic­tions that strike in high­er-poverty areas are loc­ated to­ward the right, and can­cers dis­covered more in rich­er ‘hoods are shown to­ward left:

What We're Following See More »
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
INFLUENTIAL APPROPRIATOR
Former Sen. Conrad Burns Dies in Montana
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Conrad Burns, the colorful livestock auctioneer and radio executive from Montana who served three terms as a senator, died on Thursday at age 81. Burns "was ousted from office in 2006 under the specter of scandal after developing close ties to "super-lobbyist" Jack Abramoff," although no charges were ever filed.

Source:
BETTING ON CARS
Biden Goes Max Biden at the Vatican
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In an exchange not ripped from the page of The Onion, Vice President Biden revealed to a Vatican cardinal that he's been betting reporters on which cars are faster. After meeting privately with Pope Francis, Biden met with Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State. Within moments of greeting one another, Biden said that he'd met with the pope and, gesturing to the press pool, "I've met with these guys too." Singling out reporter Gardiner Harris, who recounted the exchange, he said, "I had to pay this man $10. He's from the New York Times. We had a bet: which is the faster car, the newer Cadillac or the new [Tesla]. ... The Tesla's two tenths of a second faster. But I lost. I paid my $10." He joked that he's "seeking absolution."

17 ARRESTED
Trump’s First California Rally Turns Ugly
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump held his first rally in California Thursday night, and things were chaotic: "Hundreds of demonstrators filled the street outside the Orange County amphitheater where ... stomping on cars, hurling rocks at motorists and forcefully declaring their opposition to the Republican presidential candidate. Traffic came to a halt as a boisterous crowd walked in the roadway, some waving American and Mexican flags. Protesters smashed a window on at least one police cruiser, punctured the tires of a police sport utility vehicle, and at one point tried to flip a police car."

Source:
11 HOUSE MEMBERS NOW BEHIND HIM
Two Committee Chairs Endorse Trump
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.

Source:
×