Mississippi Could Soon Shut Down Its Only Abortion Clinic

An Appeals Court will consider a state law Monday that would close the state’s last remaining clinic.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 11: People hold up signs during a women's pro-choice rally on Capitol Hill, July 11, 2013 in Washington, DC. The rally was hosted by Planned Parenthood Federation of America to urge Congress against passing any legislation to limit access to safe and legal abortion. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
April 24, 2014, 3:20 p.m.

Mis­sis­sippi could soon be­come the first state in the na­tion without a single abor­tion pro­vider.

The U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the 5th Cir­cuit is set to hear or­al ar­gu­ments next week re­gard­ing a 2012 law that would force the only re­main­ing clin­ic in the state to close im­me­di­ately.

The le­gis­la­tion is part of a re­cent wave of an­ti­abor­tion reg­u­la­tions that have shuttered large num­bers of pro­viders in sev­er­al states. However, the situ­ation in Mis­sis­sippi is ar­gu­ably the most ex­treme, as the state has only one fa­cil­ity of­fer­ing leg­al abor­tions.

The Mis­sis­sippi law would re­quire all phys­i­cians in health cen­ters that per­form more than 10 abor­tions a year to be cer­ti­fied in ob­stet­rics and gyneco­logy and have ad­mit­ting priv­ileges at a nearby hos­pit­al.

The law was passed in April 2012 but is not cur­rently be­ing im­ple­men­ted while a chal­lenge con­tin­ues in the courts. A fed­er­al judge is­sued a pre­lim­in­ary in­junc­tion in 2013, say­ing the law was likely un­con­sti­tu­tion­al be­cause it would close the lone re­main­ing clin­ic. The state ap­pealed the de­cision, send­ing the case to the 5th Cir­cuit.

Jack­son Wo­men’s Health Or­gan­iz­a­tion, the one clin­ic that of­fers leg­al abor­tions in the state, has two pro­viders, neither of which has ad­mit­ting priv­ileges. Clin­ic own­er Di­ane Derzis said the fa­cil­ity sees 2,200 wo­men for abor­tions each year.

The clin­ic tried to ob­tain ad­mit­ting priv­ileges for the doc­tors after the law was passed, but no hos­pit­al would ac­cept them, ac­cord­ing to Derzis. “We ap­plied to every hos­pit­al — eight to 10 of them,” she said. “The Cath­ol­ic hos­pit­al turned us down im­me­di­ately. The rest took a while, but turned us down without look­ing at the phys­i­cians. They put in writ­ing that they were un­able to handle the pub­lic press from this; they were up­front about it. It’s clear the polit­ics pre­vailed with this whole thing.”

Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Phil Bry­ant has been straight­for­ward with his in­ten­tion in sign­ing the law, say­ing he wants to “make Mis­sis­sippi abor­tion-free.” Oth­er sup­port­ers of the law ar­gue that the reg­u­la­tions are meant to pro­tect wo­men’s health, but op­pon­ents say the law works against wo­men’s safety, and they point to Bry­ant’s state­ment as evid­ence the mo­tiv­a­tion is polit­ic­al and ideo­lo­gic­al.

Mis­sis­sippi had the highest teen birth rate in the na­tion in 2010 and the second highest in 2011, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion. The state saw 50.2 births per 1,000 wo­men ages 15 to 19, five-tenths of a point be­hind Arkan­sas.

Ad­voc­ates re­main un­cer­tain how the 5th Cir­cuit will rule. The court is the same one that up­held the Texas law that is set to close all but six abor­tion clin­ics in the state by Septem­ber, and de­fen­ded the de­cision by say­ing that driv­ing longer dis­tances for the ser­vices did not qual­i­fy as an “un­due bur­den” for wo­men seek­ing abor­tion ser­vices.

It’s pos­sible, though, that the judges would be more hes­it­ant in Mis­sis­sippi, since JWHO is the last pro­vider. If the clin­ic were to close, wo­men would need to travel to sur­round­ing states like Louisi­ana or Alabama, both of which are also de­bat­ing laws that would lim­it abor­tion clin­ics.

Derzis said she in­tends to “fight to the end” if the 5th Cir­cuit gives her an un­fa­vor­able rul­ing, and would im­me­di­ately ap­peal the de­cision. But without the abil­ity to provide abor­tions, the clin­ic would be in trouble be­cause the oth­er ser­vices it of­fers — birth con­trol, preg­nancy tests, and more — are not enough fin­an­cially to keep the clin­ic open.

The court will con­sider the state’s ap­peal Monday, and a de­cision could come with­in a few weeks or months. If the judges up­hold the lower court’s de­cision, the law will con­tin­ue to be put on hold while the case moves for­ward; if they strike it down, the law will go in­to ef­fect im­me­di­ately.

In the mean­time, pa­tients are pre­par­ing for the worst. “An ad­min­is­trat­or called to tell me 45 pa­tients showed up [at the clin­ic] for abor­tions today,” Derzis said. “They’re not will­ing to take the risk that they may not be able to be seen next week.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4906) }}

What We're Following See More »
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”