It didn’t make it into the flurry of news coverage on Friday, but when the latest batch of internal documents was released from the Clinton White House, a particularly curious line of poll questioning stood out.
In 1998, the Clinton administration poll tested the idea of making college students pee in cups to prove they’re not on drugs in order to qualify for financial aid, according to papers released by the Clinton Library.
While the collect-student-pee idea was never implemented, Clinton did sign the Higher Education Act reauthorization into law in 1998. The legislation included a measure stripping aid from more than 200,000 students convicted for drug offenses, something drug reformers have come to refer to as the “smoke a joint, lose your federal aid” provision. The provision has since been scaled back, though never fully repealed.
Back then, a full 75 percent of people supported requiring applicants to pass a drug test in order to receive student loans, and 80 percent supported limiting the eligibility of applicants for federal student loans should they actually test positive, according to the polling results cited by the Clinton administration. Below is the relevant section from Friday’s release:
It might as well have been a lifetime ago where drug policy is concerned.
In 1998 medical marijuana was only legal in a handful of states (today it’s available in 21). The racially loaded disparity in sentences for users of crack and users of powdered cocaine was still 100-1. And Students for Sensible Drug Policy, an organization formed to oppose policies such the ones polled above, didn’t even exist yet.
“Legalization was barely a topic for debate, much less the mainstream, majority-supported issue it is today,” said Tom Angell, who spent several years on staff at SSDP before going to work for another pro-reform group, Marijuana Majority. “If you polled this question in 2014 I’m confident you’d see dramatically less support for this draconian policy than the Clinton White House found in 1998.”
Perhaps the most relevant debate today revolves around requiring food-stamp recipients to take drug tests — and the public has evolved there less than you might think. The House of Representatives recently passed legislation that would allow states to require food-stamp recipients get drug tested, and a majority of Americans (64 percent, according to a recent Huffington Post/YouGov poll) still like the idea of drug testing for welfare recipients, a more stigmatized population than college applicants.
But if there’s one population Americans most like to see forced to pee in cups, it appears that it would be Congress. Too bad the Clinton administration didn’t think of polling that.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"