Quitting Smoking Costs More If You’re Poor

A new CDC report finds that coverage for tobacco cessation treatment is lacking in state Medicaid programs.

A man smokes a cigarette on September 6, 2012 in Paris.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
April 3, 2014, 1 a.m.

Most Amer­ic­ans get help quit­ting smoking for free. The poorest Amer­ic­ans don’t.

That’s be­cause the Af­ford­able Care Act re­quired all private in­sur­ance plans to cov­er to­bacco ces­sa­tion treat­ment at no charge to the pa­tient. But Medi­caid, a state-run pub­lic health pro­gram for the low-in­come and dis­abled, has no such man­date.

And Medi­caid be­ne­fi­ciar­ies are pay­ing for it. A new re­port from the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion finds that states don’t of­fer many of the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment’s re­com­men­ded treat­ments, and the ser­vices they do cov­er come with co-pays, lim­its on the dur­a­tion of use, and oth­er bar­ri­ers to ac­cess for Medi­caid pa­tients.

While all states cov­er some kind of to­bacco ces­sa­tion treat­ment in their Medi­caid pro­grams, the re­port finds, only sev­en states cov­er all sev­en FDA-ap­proved med­ic­a­tions and two re­com­men­ded forms of ces­sa­tion coun­sel­ing (in­di­vidu­al and group).

There’s a de­mand for the ser­vices, too. Medi­caid be­ne­fi­ciar­ies have high­er smoking rates than the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion, CDC data finds, with 30.1 per­cent of Medi­caid en­rollees un­der the age of 65 smoking, com­pared with 18.1 per­cent of all U.S. adults.

“Smoking-re­lated dis­ease is a ma­jor con­trib­ut­or to in­creas­ing Medi­caid costs,” the re­port says. “The evid­ence from pre­vi­ous ana­lyses sug­gests that states could re­duce smoking-re­lated mor­bid­ity and health-care costs among Medi­caid en­rollees by provid­ing Medi­caid cov­er­age for all evid­ence-based ces­sa­tion treat­ments, re­mov­ing all bar­ri­ers to ac­cess­ing these treat­ments, pro­mot­ing the cov­er­age, and mon­it­or­ing its use.”

For the CDC re­port, re­search­ers at the Amer­ic­an Lung As­so­ci­ation tracked cov­er­age in state Medi­caid pro­grams between Decem­ber 31, 2008, and Janu­ary 31, 2014. They looked at wheth­er there were any bar­ri­ers to ob­tain­ing the ser­vices, such as co-pays or lim­its on the num­ber of treat­ments.

Al­though more states in­creased the num­ber of treat­ments covered between 2008 and 2014, more states also ad­ded bar­ri­ers to ac­cess­ing those treat­ments. That trend can be at­trib­uted, in part, to the Af­ford­able Care Act’s re­quire­ment that state Medi­caid pro­grams cov­er all FDA-ap­proved to­bacco ces­sa­tion med­ic­a­tions by Janu­ary 2014. Not all states used to of­fer that be­ne­fit, so as some ad­ded it, they also ad­ded it with re­stric­tions.

There’s some evid­ence to sug­gest both a be­ne­fit for pop­u­la­tion health and state budget sav­ings for man­dat­ing full cov­er­age. Mas­sachu­setts re­quired cov­er­age of to­bacco-ces­sa­tion treat­ment for Medi­caid be­ne­fi­ciar­ies in 2006, and saw smoking pre­val­ence among the Medi­caid pop­u­la­tion drop from 38 per­cent to 28 per­cent, as well as a nearly 50 per­cent re­duc­tion in hos­pit­al ad­mis­sions for heart at­tacks and oth­er heart con­di­tions among the pop­u­la­tion us­ing the be­ne­fit, ac­cord­ing to a study fun­ded by the CDC in 2010. For every dol­lar spent on provid­ing the cov­er­age, Mas­sachu­setts saved $3.12 in re­duced med­ic­al spend­ing on heart con­di­tions.

In pub­lish­ing the re­port, ALA Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al Health Policy Jen­nifer Sing­le­terry said they hope to make state Medi­caid pro­grams aware of the cov­er­age gap, and en­cour­age them to fully ad­opt the be­ne­fit.

COR­REC­TION: A pre­vi­ous ver­sion of the map ac­com­pa­ny­ing this art­icle in­dic­ated that New York and Ten­ness­ee both ad­ded and re­moved bar­ri­ers. The two states have only ad­ded bar­ri­ers.

What We're Following See More »
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.