Obamacare’s Calorie-Count Requirement Gets Delayed

Diners can gorge themselves in blissful ignorance a little longer as FDA pushes back labeling until year’s end.

National Journal
Clara Ritger
Feb. 28, 2014, 7:42 a.m.

The Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion has missed yet an­oth­er self-im­posed dead­line to get out fi­nal rules on the menu cal­or­ie-la­beling re­quire­ment un­der Obama­care.

The agency had told mem­bers of the food re­tail in­dustry it should ex­pect fi­nal guidelines in Feb­ru­ary, and the top­ic ap­peared to be on the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget’s agenda for this month. But the rules are nowhere close to the fin­ish line, and the FDA is now de­clin­ing in­ter­view re­quests about the cal­or­ie-la­beling rules al­to­geth­er.

“We are cur­rently re­view­ing com­ments sub­mit­ted in re­sponse to the pro­posed rules and hope to is­sue fi­nal reg­u­la­tions by the end of the year,” said FDA spokes­wo­man Theresa Eis­en­man in an email.

The Af­ford­able Care Act, signed in­to law in March 2010, re­quires food es­tab­lish­ments to post cal­or­ies on menus and drive-through signs, in an ef­fort to make con­sumers more aware of the nu­tri­tion in­form­a­tion in the food they eat.

Which food re­tail­ers are sub­ject to the law, however, has be­come a heated de­bate that FDA Com­mis­sion­er Mar­garet Ham­burg has pre­vi­ously called “the most com­plic­ated” part of writ­ing the fi­nal rules.

“There are very, very strong opin­ions and power­ful voices both on the con­sumer and pub­lic health side and on the in­dustry side, and we have worked very hard to sort of fig­ure out what really makes sense and also what is im­ple­ment­able,” Ham­burg said in an in­ter­view with the As­so­ci­ated Press a year ago.

The FDA is­sued pro­posed rules in April 2011. More than 900 com­ments were sub­mit­ted to the agency, which has held meet­ings with key stake­hold­ers about how the re­quire­ment would im­pact food chains, mom-and-pop diners, and even su­per­mar­kets selling pre­pared deli items.

Nearly three years — and mul­tiple, self-im­posed dead­lines — have passed since the FDA is­sued the pro­posed guidelines. The FDA had planned to is­sue fi­nal rules at the end of 2011, with busi­nesses ex­pec­ted to be­gin com­ply­ing in 2012. In March 2013, Ham­burg told the As­so­ci­ated Press the agency was in the fi­nal stages of writ­ing the reg­u­la­tions, with a tent­at­ive plan to is­sue them that spring. Spring came and went with no rules, and they were next ex­pec­ted to be re­leased in Septem­ber 2013. Still without rules, Ham­burg said at an event in Novem­ber that they would be re­leased “soon.”

Some res­taur­ants have star­ted put­ting up cal­or­ies vol­un­tar­ily. Oth­ers are re­quired to by loc­al or­din­ances, such as the one in New York City, where res­taur­ants and cof­fee shops have been post­ing cal­or­ie counts since mid-2008. But un­til the FDA gets its guidelines out the door, con­sumers across the coun­try will con­tin­ue to wait to see nu­tri­tion­al in­form­a­tion pos­ted in all places where they buy and eat meals.

What We're Following See More »
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.