The One Statistic to Forever Scare You Away From Drugs

Share this with your children.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Feb. 7, 2014, 6:51 a.m.

Ac­cord­ing to a newly re­leased study from the Journ­al of Sub­stance Ab­use Treat­ment, hard drug users who use both heroin and co­caine have a mor­tal­ity rate that is 14.3 times high­er than the pop­u­la­tion at large. 

For users of co­caine alone, that rate is 5.1 times high­er. 

The res­ults come from a sur­vey of more than 20,000 drug users in Spain who were ad­mit­ted in­to treat­ment pro­grams over the span of 10 years (1997-2007). The re­search­ers fol­lowed up on the par­ti­cipants un­til 2008, ac­cu­mu­lat­ing “a total of 132,824 per­son-years of fol­low-up,” they wrote — a truly massive amount of data.

The au­thors sug­gest this is per­haps the largest sample of drug users ever stud­ied. 

Here are some of their grim find­ings.

  • “Heroin use was also the strongest in­de­pend­ent pre­dict­or of a high­er mor­tal­ity risk among all co­caine users.”
  • “Oth­er sig­nificant risk factors were daily co­caine use and hav­ing been pre­vi­ously ad­mit­ted to drug treat­ment.”
  • “Not hav­ing reg­u­lar em­ploy­ment and life­time drug in­jec­tion were im­port­ant in­de­pend­ent mor­tal­ity risk factors both among [co­caine-only users] and [co­caine and heroin users].”

Their find­ings also sug­gest that co­caine use is slightly more dan­ger­ous for wo­men than men, but they are not sure why. 

Though the num­bers are stark, the re­search­ers do ad­mit that their sample was lim­ited to people who have entered re­hab, which could mean the par­ti­cipants in their sample had a more ag­gress­ive drug habit than what would be rep­res­en­ted in a truly ran­dom sample. And also, dir­ect caus­a­tion can’t be in­ferred from a sur­vey. “This ex­cess mor­tal­ity can­not auto­mat­ic­ally be at­trib­uted to co­caine or heroin use, be­cause par­ti­cipants and the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion may dif­fer in oth­er factors that were not as­sessed, such as men­tal dis­orders, per­son­al­ity factors, [and] so­cial con­di­tions,” they write.

But still, even if it serves as a high bound­ary of the risks of us­ing drugs, it’s a bound­ary you don’t want to ap­proach. After all, who would would want to even double their chance of dy­ing, let alone in­creas­ing it 14-fold.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
21 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
47 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×