Congress’s Medicare Deal Isn’t a Deal at All

Democrats and Republicans are touting a permanent “doc fix,” but they’ve yet to reach agreement on the hardest part: how to pay for it.

The opening session of the 113th Congress. (Rick Bloom)
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Feb. 6, 2014, 7:51 a.m.

Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are tout­ing a com­prom­ise that would re­peal a flawed for­mula that de­term­ines Medi­care phys­i­cian pay­ments, but for now it’s a deal in name only.

Law­makers in both cham­bers are plan­ning to in­tro­duce bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion Thursday to re­peal Medi­care’s Sus­tain­able Growth Rate for­mula, a phys­i­cian pay­ment plan Con­gress passed in 1997 in the hopes of lim­it­ing spend­ing on the massive so­cial pro­gram. Since 2003, however, Con­gress has passed short-term patches to stop the cuts, a mad­den­ing an­nu­al tra­di­tion known as the “doc fix” that has come at a cost of roughly $150 bil­lion.

In an ef­fort to end the an­nu­al ex­er­cise, the bills law­makers are re­leas­ing Thursday would re­peal the SGR for­mula and would in­sti­tute five years of an­nu­al up­dates of 0.5 per­cent to Medi­care phys­i­cians’ pay.

But des­pite the bills’ bi­par­tis­an back­ing, law­makers have yet to agree on the thorn­i­est is­sue of the doc fix: how to pay for it.

Neither bill in­cludes meas­ures to off­set the spend­ing — a hole that could sink it among the Hill’s budget hawks. And as Con­gress de­bates where to cut or where to get new rev­en­ue to off­set the spend­ing, the deal’s bi­par­tis­an sup­port could splinter.

The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice is slated to do a cost es­tim­ate of the meas­ures Thursday af­ter­noon, be­fore they are form­ally un­veiled.

If it were to pass, the com­prom­ise le­gis­la­tion as cur­rently writ­ten would cre­ate a pro­gram and qual­ity meas­ures to eval­u­ate per­form­ance and re­ward pro­viders who im­prove health out­comes, and it adds in­cent­ives for care co­ordin­a­tion for pa­tients with chron­ic con­di­tions. Ad­di­tion­ally, it cre­ates a Phys­i­cian Com­pare web­site that Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies can use to make de­cisions about pro­viders, as well as to al­low out­side re­view­ers to eval­u­ate qual­ity of care.

This year’s round of phys­i­cian re­im­burse­ment cuts is set to take ef­fect in March, un­less Con­gress acts.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
17 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×