Congress’s Medicare Deal Isn’t a Deal at All

Democrats and Republicans are touting a permanent “doc fix,” but they’ve yet to reach agreement on the hardest part: how to pay for it.

The opening session of the 113th Congress. (Rick Bloom)
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Feb. 6, 2014, 7:51 a.m.

Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are tout­ing a com­prom­ise that would re­peal a flawed for­mula that de­term­ines Medi­care phys­i­cian pay­ments, but for now it’s a deal in name only.

Law­makers in both cham­bers are plan­ning to in­tro­duce bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion Thursday to re­peal Medi­care’s Sus­tain­able Growth Rate for­mula, a phys­i­cian pay­ment plan Con­gress passed in 1997 in the hopes of lim­it­ing spend­ing on the massive so­cial pro­gram. Since 2003, however, Con­gress has passed short-term patches to stop the cuts, a mad­den­ing an­nu­al tra­di­tion known as the “doc fix” that has come at a cost of roughly $150 bil­lion.

In an ef­fort to end the an­nu­al ex­er­cise, the bills law­makers are re­leas­ing Thursday would re­peal the SGR for­mula and would in­sti­tute five years of an­nu­al up­dates of 0.5 per­cent to Medi­care phys­i­cians’ pay.

But des­pite the bills’ bi­par­tis­an back­ing, law­makers have yet to agree on the thorn­i­est is­sue of the doc fix: how to pay for it.

Neither bill in­cludes meas­ures to off­set the spend­ing — a hole that could sink it among the Hill’s budget hawks. And as Con­gress de­bates where to cut or where to get new rev­en­ue to off­set the spend­ing, the deal’s bi­par­tis­an sup­port could splinter.

The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice is slated to do a cost es­tim­ate of the meas­ures Thursday af­ter­noon, be­fore they are form­ally un­veiled.

If it were to pass, the com­prom­ise le­gis­la­tion as cur­rently writ­ten would cre­ate a pro­gram and qual­ity meas­ures to eval­u­ate per­form­ance and re­ward pro­viders who im­prove health out­comes, and it adds in­cent­ives for care co­ordin­a­tion for pa­tients with chron­ic con­di­tions. Ad­di­tion­ally, it cre­ates a Phys­i­cian Com­pare web­site that Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies can use to make de­cisions about pro­viders, as well as to al­low out­side re­view­ers to eval­u­ate qual­ity of care.

This year’s round of phys­i­cian re­im­burse­ment cuts is set to take ef­fect in March, un­less Con­gress acts.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×