Think Obamacare is going to fail? Now you can you put your money where your mouth is.
A Silicon Valley start-up called Motif Investing has created a way for investors to essentially bet on the law’s failure: It’s selling an investment portfolio full of firms that stand to reap big benefits if the law is repealed or collapses in implementation.
It is also offering an option for investors of the opposite persuasion: a reciprocal portfolio of companies that stand to prosper under the new health care regime.
Motif Investing used algorithms to pick a subset of stocks in the index, giving consumers who invest in Obamacare a cross-section of the industries that will profit from more insured Americans and the cost-containment provisions of the health care law. Consumers who invest in “Repeal Obamacare” get a selection of companies in industries that faced big cuts from the law.
The “betting-on-failure” basket of stocks is heavy into companies that do diagnostics, create medical devices, and provide assisted living for seniors. The pro-Obamacare portfolio is made up largely of pharmacies, hospitals, generic drug companies, and electronic medical record companies.
“There is bipartisan support around repealing the excise tax on medical devices,” said Hardeep Walia, CEO and former Microsoft executive. “So there doesn’t have to be a full repeal to see a benefit to some of these industries.”
In theory, both stock groups could do well at the same time. But the most interesting trend Walia has observed is how the expiration of the drug patent cliffs and the Affordable Care Act’s provisions promoting lower drug costs have caused generic-drug stocks to soar.
Motif Investing offers other specialized portfolios, such as Gay-Friendly Companies, Kings of K Street (companies that spend the highest percentage of their money on lobbying), and No-Glass Ceiling (women-led corporations).
“Do women make better CEOs?” Walia asks. “Are gay-friendly companies more likely to succeed than non-gay-friendly companies?”
You can bet on it.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.