Where Obamacare Ends and Private Insurers Begin

The White House has always promised the ACA isn’t a government takeover of health care. They’re about to find out if anyone believes them.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 11: Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testifies during a House Health Subcommittee hearing on 'PPACA (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) Implementation Failures: What's Next?' in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill, December 11, 2013, in Washington, DC. Sebelius has called for an investigation into the management and contracting decisions that went in to the botched rollout of the HealthCare.gov website. (Photo by Rod Lamkey/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
Dec. 12, 2013, midnight

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4620) }}

Health and Hu­man Ser­vices Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us prom­ised Wed­nes­day that the back-end prob­lems of Health­Care.gov would be re­solved in time for the in­sur­ance cov­er­age tak­ing ef­fect on Jan. 1, set­ting an­oth­er high bar for the ad­min­is­tra­tion as it at­tempts to re­cov­er from Af­ford­able Care Act’s rocky rol­lout.

“We cer­tainly have a plan — and we have vet­ted it and dis­cussed it with in­surers — that they are very com­fort­able with to get them their re­im­burse­ment,” Se­beli­us said at the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee hear­ing on the status of Obama­care im­ple­ment­a­tion.

With front-end en­roll­ment on the fed­er­al web­site func­tion­ing much bet­ter after the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s self-im­posed Dec. 1 dead­line, at­ten­tion has in­creas­ingly turned to the site’s crit­ic­al back end, which sends health care shop­pers to the in­surers that will ul­ti­mately provide them with cov­er­age.

Er­rors in con­sumer data forms sent to in­surers, com­bined with the fact that much of the pay­ment sys­tem is still be­ing built, have raised con­cerns about the in­ter­ac­tion between the fed­er­al web­site and in­sur­ance com­pan­ies. If those in­ter­ac­tions go awry, some in­sur­ance shop­pers may be giv­en the im­pres­sion they’re covered without hav­ing been fully en­rolled.

However, Se­beli­us as­sured the com­mit­tee Wed­nes­day that the sys­tem im­prove­ments are con­tinu­ing.

At Health­Care.gov‘s launch, the er­ror rate for such forms was around 25 per­cent. Now, that er­ror rate has dropped to about 10 per­cent. Se­beli­us said that HHS is cur­rently hand-match­ing con­sumer and in­surer re­cords to catch er­rors in the auto­mated sys­tem.

“There’s a manu­al work­around, I would say, for vir­tu­ally everything that isn’t fully auto­mated yet,” Se­beli­us said. “It is in place, it just will be manu­al un­til the auto­ma­tion is fully com­plete and we’ve tested it and make sure it works. But in the mean­time, the pay­ment sys­tem will ab­so­lutely go for­ward.”

But try­ing to ex­plain the web­site’s back-end func­tion­ing takes the ad­min­is­tra­tion in­to sticky ter­rit­ory, as of­fi­cials try to draw a line between the Af­ford­able Care Act and private in­surers — a task made par­tic­u­larly dif­fi­cult after years of crit­ics claim­ing the law is a “gov­ern­ment takeover” of health care.

The ex­changes, after all, are not in­sur­ance pro­viders. In­stead, they are portals through which private cit­izens can — and, un­less they want to pay a fine, must — buy in­sur­ance from private in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.

After en­rolling in the web­site, in­di­vidu­als are in­sured once they have se­lec­ted their plan and paid their premi­um to the in­sur­ance com­pany. In­surers will then re­ceive a tax cred­it and cost-shar­ing re­im­burse­ment for eli­gible con­sumers start­ing in mid-Janu­ary, ac­cord­ing to Se­beli­us.

That dis­tinc­tion caused no short­age of con­fu­sion and con­ten­tion at the sec­ret­ary’s Hill ap­pear­ance Wed­nes­day.

“What if that pa­tient doesn’t make the premi­um pay­ment?” asked Rep. Mi­chael Bur­gess, R-Texas. “You said they’re covered Dec. 23, but they nev­er write the check. They nev­er make the pay­ment.”

Se­beli­us re­spon­ded: “Then they’re not covered. They are not en­rolled. We did not take over the private in­sur­ance mar­ket. People will pur­chase in­sur­ance from in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.”

But even as the ad­min­is­tra­tion struggles to draw the line, their own meth­od of meas­ur­ing par­ti­cip­a­tion in the ex­changes fur­ther mud­dies the wa­ters.

When HHS re­ports the ex­change en­roll­ment num­bers, it in­cludes those in­di­vidu­als who have se­lec­ted a plan but not yet paid as en­rolled. HHS main­tains that this is be­cause the gov­ern­ment’s role in the pro­cess ends once the con­sumer chooses a plan, at which point they work dir­ectly with the in­sur­ance com­pany.

But it is also a polit­ic­al ex­pedi­ency, as a nar­row defin­i­tion would fur­ther lower en­roll­ment num­bers at a time when the ad­min­is­tra­tion is already lag­ging far be­hind its goals.

What We're Following See More »
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
3 hours ago

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
6 hours ago

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

GOP Could Double Number of Early Primaries
6 hours ago

"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."

Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
8 hours ago

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

House GOP Changes Rules for Spending Measures
8 hours ago

"Speaker Paul Ryan is changing the rules of how the House will consider spending measures to try to prevent Democrats from offering surprise amendments that have recently put the GOP on defense. ... Ryan announced at a House GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning that members will now have to submit their amendments ahead of time so that they are pre-printed in the Congressional Record, according to leadership aides." The change will take effect after the Memorial Day recess.