The IMF Wants Your Gas to Be More Expensive

Fuel prices don’t accurately reflect their environmental impact, the international body says in a new report.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JULY 22: Gas pumps are seen at a Chevron gas station on July 22, 2013 in San Francisco, California. According to AAA, the national average price for a gallon of regular gasoline rose to $3.67 as prices have surged 12 cents in the past week due in part to the unrest in Egypt and production disruptions at US refineries. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
National Journal
Jason Plautz
July 31, 2014, 10:21 a.m.

Rising gas prices may be the bane of most drivers, but the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­et­ary Fund says those costs aren’t nearly high enough.

In a book re­leased today, the IMF states simply, “Many en­ergy prices in many coun­tries are wrong.” The in­ter­na­tion­al bank backs tax re­form that would peg fuel, coal, nat­ur­al gas, and dies­el prices to the cost of glob­al warm­ing, air pol­lu­tion, and the im­pacts of mo­tor-vehicle use.

For the U.S., for ex­ample, that could mean a $1.60 per gal­lon cor­rect­ive tax on gas­ol­ine to cov­er health im­pacts from car ex­haust pol­lu­tion, traffic ac­ci­dents, and wear and tear on high­ways, plus taxes on coal and nat­ur­al gas to ac­count for the en­ergy sec­tor.

But the be­ne­fits, the re­port says, would be felt across the spec­trum. In­centiv­iz­ing people to use less-dirty fuel would lower world­wide deaths from air pol­lu­tion linked to fossil fuels by 63 per­cent (the bulk linked to coal) and slash car­bon di­ox­ide emis­sions by 23 per­cent. The gains could even be felt in gross do­mest­ic product, with an av­er­age 2.6 per­cent boost.

IMF Man­aging Dir­ect­or Christine Lagarde ad­mit­ted that im­pos­ing a fuel tax hasn’t got­ten a gen­er­ous re­cep­tion in the U.S. or in some oth­er coun­tries. And she also noted that tax re­form doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily mean a tax in­crease (“smarter taxes” was the buzzword for the po­ten­tial to off­set taxes else­where).

“I know it’s not a par­tic­u­larly pop­u­lar sug­ges­tion, but it is our sug­ges­tion,” Lagarde said today at an event hos­ted by the Cen­ter for Glob­al De­vel­op­ment.

“In all of this, fisc­al policy must take cen­ter stage, and our mes­sage is clear: To get it right, price it right,” she ad­ded.

Echo­ing the sen­ti­ments of oth­er car­bon-tax pro­ponents, Lagarde also poin­ted out that high­er en­ergy prices wouldn’t just dir­ect more money to cli­mate-change ef­forts, but could also dir­ect people to use clean­er fuels, re­duce their en­ergy use, or shift to a fuel-ef­fi­cient car. The rev­en­ue raised could also be used to off­set taxes on in­come, pay down pub­lic debt, or ad­dress in­come in­equal­ity, she said.

The re­port meas­ures the im­pact of tax re­form on 156 coun­tries, not­ing that the en­ergy tax re­form would al­low some coun­tries to move in­de­pend­ently on cli­mate change rather than wait­ing for in­ter­na­tion­al ac­tion. In the U.S., for ex­ample, the re­port of­fers a pro­pos­al for a tax of more than $8 per giga­joule on coal, while nat­ur­al gas would see a cor­rect­ive tax of just over $3 per giga­joule.

Of course, rais­ing en­ergy prices is a huge ask. The Aus­trali­an gov­ern­ment this month nixed that coun­try’s car­bon tax. And even while Con­gress sweats through an­oth­er short-term fix to keep the High­way Trust Fund afloat this week, there’s little mo­mentum to rais­ing the coun­try’s 18.4-cents-per-gal­lon gas­ol­ine tax to cov­er the up­keep of trans­port­a­tion in­fra­struc­ture.

Lagarde—who has over­seen a shift at the IMF to tackle cli­mate change—said the eco­nom­ic ap­proach to en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact was one that made sense to the mon­et­ary body, es­pe­cially as na­tions pre­pare for cli­mate change talks in Par­is next year.

“It’s bad for an eco­nomy to be down­graded, but it’s even worse for an eco­nomy to be de­graded,” Lagarde said. “A de­graded en­vir­on­ment leads to a de­graded eco­nomy.”

What We're Following See More »
WORDS AND PICTURES
White House Looks Back on bin Laden Mission
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
NO BATTLE OVER SEATTLE
SCOTUS Won’t Hear Appeal of Minimum-Wage Law
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a sweeping constitutional challenge to Seattle’s minimum wage law, in what could have been a test case for future legal attacks on similar measures across the country. In a one-line order, the justices declined to hear a case by the International Franchise Association and a group of Seattle franchisees, which had said in court papers that the city’s gradual wage increase to $15 discriminates against them in a way that violates the Constitution’s commerce clause."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN JUNE
DC to Release Draft Constitution as Part of Statehood Push
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The New Columbia Statehood Commission—composed of five District leaders including Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, and D.C.'s congressional delegation—voted today to publicly release a draft of a new constitution for an eventual state next Friday, at the Lincoln Cottage." It's the first step in a statehood push this year that will include a constitutional convention in June and a referendum in November.

Source:
ALZHEIMER’S OUTCRY
Will Ferrell Bails on Reagan Movie
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Amid outcry by President Reagan's children, actor Will Ferrell has pulled out of a movie that makes light of Reagan's Alzheimer's disease. A spokesperson for Ferrell said, “The ‘Reagan’ script is one of a number of scripts that had been submitted to Will Ferrell which he had considered. While it is by no means an ‘Alzheimer’s comedy’ as has been suggested, Mr. Ferrell is not pursuing this project."

Source:
×