The House Science Committee Has Held More Hearings on Aliens Than on Climate Change

Young supporters hold inflatable alien dolls with 'Joe' stickers on them, as Republican presidential candidate John McCain addresses a campaign rally at the airport in Roswell, New Mexico on November 3, 2008.
National Journal
Emma Roller
May 21, 2014, 11:02 a.m.

Con­gress is fas­cin­ated by the search for in­tel­li­gent life on oth­er plan­ets. Ap­par­ently, they’ve giv­en up the search at home.

In this ses­sion of Con­gress, House com­mit­tees tasked with cov­er­ing U.S. en­ergy and sci­ence have held a total of sev­en hear­ings to dis­cuss cli­mate change. By con­trast, the two cham­bers have held a com­bined 19 hear­ings about space ex­plor­a­tion in that same time peri­od.

The House Sci­ence, Space, and Tech­no­logy Com­mit­tee — led by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, since 2013 — has held 15 hear­ings on space ex­plor­a­tion alone, at least three of which have in­volved the search for ex­tra­ter­restri­al life. By com­par­is­on, Smith’s com­mit­tee has held just two hear­ings de­voted to cli­mate change.

The Demo­crat-con­trolled Sen­ate doesn’t have a much bet­ter re­cord. The Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee has held three hear­ings this ses­sion on cli­mate change, while the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee has not had a hear­ing de­voted to the top­ic since 2012. The Sen­ate Com­merce Sci­ence and Space Sub­com­mit­tee has had one hear­ing about cli­mate change and four about space.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4964) }}

On the House side, the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee hos­ted one sol­it­ary hear­ing about cli­mate change, and the House Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee has not had a hear­ing on cli­mate change in the 113th Con­gress.

In a House Sci­ence Com­mit­tee hear­ing Wed­nes­day, Seth Shos­tak, an Amer­ic­an as­tro­nomer, de­fen­ded the no­tion that the search for ali­en life is worth­while. He poin­ted out that NASA’s Kepler mis­sion has found there are tril­lion of plan­ets in our galaxy, in­clud­ing many plan­ets that could hy­po­thet­ic­ally sup­port life.

“It’s very easy to make fun of this,” Shos­tak said. “On the oth­er hand, it would have been very easy to make fun of Ferdin­and Magel­lan’s idea to sail around the earth, or Cap­tain Cook to map the South Pa­cific.”

And make fun of it the com­mit­tee mem­bers did. Rep. Bill John­son, R-Ohio, joked that ex­tra­ter­restri­al so­ci­et­ies may be act­ively avoid­ing con­tact with earth­lings. “Maybe they’ve got their caller ID turned on or something,” John­son said.

Rep. Chris Collins, R-New York, joined the fun. “I’m go­ing to ask what every­one in the room wants to ask. Have you watched An­cient Ali­ens, and what do you think of that series?” he asked. “I think I’ve been on that pro­gram,” Shos­tak replied.

But com­mit­tee Chair­man Lamar Smith took the is­sue very ser­i­ously, press­ing the pan­el­ists on how likely it is that there’s in­tel­li­gent life on oth­er plan­ets. He was pleased with their re­sponse: nearly 100 per­cent.

While Smith may sup­port the search for ex­tra­ter­restri­al life, he’s much less sym­path­et­ic about the cause of cli­mate change on this plan­et. Last year, Smith wrote a column in The Wash­ing­ton Post cast­ing doubt on the idea that glob­al warm­ing is caused by hu­man en­ergy use.

“Cli­mate change is an is­sue that needs to be dis­cussed thought­fully and ob­ject­ively,” Smith wrote. “Con­trary to the claims of those who want to strictly reg­u­late car­bon di­ox­ide emis­sions and in­crease the cost of en­ergy for all Amer­ic­ans, there is a great amount of un­cer­tainty as­so­ci­ated with cli­mate sci­ence.”

But, judging by the ac­tions of the com­mit­tee Smith chairs, a reasoned de­bate about Earth’s at­mo­sphere isn’t nearly as ap­peal­ing as spec­u­lat­ing on the at­mo­spheres of oth­er plan­ets.

You could ar­gue that it makes sense for the House Sci­ence Com­mit­tee to rig­or­ously dis­cuss out­er space — after all, it’s right there in the com­mit­tee’s name. But you could also ar­gue that when the com­mit­tee you chair has the word “sci­ence” in its name, you may want to dis­cuss the premi­er sci­entif­ic de­bate that’s go­ing on.

The House Sci­ence Com­mit­tee has dis­cussed cli­mate change in re­la­tion to oth­er pro­jects, such as the Key­stone XL pipeline. But its main fo­cus, along with oth­er House com­mit­tees deal­ing with en­ergy and the en­vir­on­ment, has been to rep­rim­and the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency for its reg­u­la­tions.

At Wed­nes­day’s hear­ing, Dan Werthi­mer of the Search for Ex­tra­ter­restri­al In­tel­li­gence In­sti­tute, or SETI, made the point that a search for in­tel­li­gent life could prove fu­tile. “If we dis­cov­er that we are alone, we’d bet­ter take really good care of life on this plan­et,” he told the com­mit­tee.

The truth may be out there, but so are some un­com­fort­able truths we’ll even­tu­ally have to deal with, right here.

What We're Following See More »
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
5 hours ago
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
6 hours ago

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
7 hours ago

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
7 hours ago

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
12 hours ago

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.