When Senate Republicans went to bat over a slew of energy amendments last week, they also offered up a preview of what 2015 will look like if the GOP takes the Senate.
Monday marked the long-awaited death of a bipartisan energy bill, when an efficiency measure from Ohio Republican Rob Portman and New Hampshire Democrat Jeanne Shaheen garnered only 55 of the 60 votes it needed to advance (three Republicans, including Portman, voted for the bill). The bill’s bipartisan sponsorship wasn’t enough to overcome a procedural squabble over amendments and a political chess match over a vote on the Keystone XL oil-sands pipeline.
Within that squabble, however, was a window into top Republican priorities, as their proposed amendments read like a laundry list of the party’s energy goals: approval of the pipeline, legislation checking the Environmental Protection Agency’s air-quality rules, and a full stop to the Obama administration’s climate-change efforts for power plants.
“Republicans will continue to push for the Senate to address these important matters, whether Democrats want to join us or not,” said Don Stewart, spokesman for Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Democrats have been quick to blame the Right for the death of the Shaheen-Portman efficiency bill, saying that they moved the goalposts by asking for five amendments. Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday that the Right was holding the bill “hostage” rather than taking a deal for a clean vote on the bill with a separate vote on Keystone.
But Republicans have countered that Reid is squelching their opportunity to get votes on an energy bill — something they haven’t had a chance to do since 2007.
Besides an up-or-down vote on Keystone, a longtime priority for Republicans and red-state Democrats alike, the GOP had hoped to bring up amendments that would have barred a carbon tax and blocked EPA’s greenhouse-gas rules for power plants. Other language would have stopped EPA’s planned revisions to the air-quality standard for ozone and touched on geothermal energy.
Those aren’t new or surprising proposals — Republicans have long gone after the power-plant rules, including a January push by McConnell to use a disapproval resolution under the Congressional Review Act to force a vote on the standards. Similar measures were offered up around the debate around the budget, the 2012 transportation bill, and other major debates, although Republicans have said that this energy bill offered the best place for them.
And it’s unlikely that last week was the end of the road for the proposals, given the vitriol around EPA rules and other energy issues.
Even Portman, who wrote the efficiency bill under fire, said that the push for a handful of amendments was “a reasonable request” and that he hoped negotiations would continue to allow them on his bill if it came up again.
“We can maybe take a breather, reflect on where we are, and reconsider maybe having four or five votes on amendments,” Portman said before Monday’s vote.
Whether they’ll get a chance is an open question — the Senate will likely move to a tax-extenders package this week, but given the broad range of measures in it, Senate aides don’t expect it to get bogged down in another energy-amendment battle. There’s no guarantee that Shaheen-Portman will come back for a third time, even if sponsors are hopeful of striking a deal.
Last week, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee ranking member Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, said she was concerned that the big political fights were threatening to hold up any energy policy, including a nuclear-waste bill and possible movement on water policy.
But Republicans are holding onto faith that they’ll have a chance to bring them up, especially if they’re in the majority after the fall midterm elections. John Hoeven of North Dakota said last week that he thinks a vote on Keystone will get even closer to 60 votes next year if some key seats switch.
That’s already got environmentalists sweating that they’ll have to invest even more energy battling back anti-EPA moves, something that’s become a full-time job in the Republican-controlled House.
“The debate over this energy-efficiency bill could be a preview of the Senate Republicans’ energy agenda if they are in the majority next year,” said Dan Weiss of the Center for American Progress. “This agenda includes measures that benefit big oil companies while halting efforts to slow climate change.”
What We're Following See More »
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.
UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”