Luxembourg may consume the most meat per capita, but it’s not the country whose carnivorous eating habits have climate-change experts worried.
It’s two other, much bigger countries: the United States and China.
Worldwide, agriculture is responsible for one-third of human-caused greenhouse-gas emissions. A majority comes from grazing livestock, and mostly from beef, whose share of livestock carbon emissions is six times that of poultry on a per-unit basis. And the U.S., the world’s biggest consumer of red meat, and China, whose demand for beef is set to skyrocket, are large contributors to those emissions.
Reaching the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s global-warming mitigation goals, a recent study found, would require both countries to eat a lot less meat.
Per capita beef consumption in the U.S. has actually dropped in recent years, from its peak of 88.8 pounds in 1976, to 58.7 pounds in 2009. Red meat has been linked to a number of cardiovascular diseases, and doctors are advising their patients against eating too much of it. The recession has also contributed to the decreased demand for beef.
But people in the U.S. still eat the stuff in excess: per capita consumption ranks second after Luxembourg across the world and is three times the global average.
China, on the other hand, is steadily becoming a meat-eating nation. Its levels of meat consumption doubled between 1990 and 2002. Red meat consumption is expected to increase 116 percent by 2050. The rising demand is due to a growing affluent culture in the country, influenced by Western eating habits. More money, more meat on the menu. Here’s what that looks like in a graph, compared with U.S. trends:
(Earth Policy Institute)
Climate experts say there’s still hope for curbing this upward trend, because historically, China lives off a whole-foods, plant-based diet. A recent massive public-relations campaign to curb the consumption of shark fin soup in China led to a plunge in the traditional delicacy’s demand. A similar effort, to steer people away from beef and toward pork or chicken, which require less water and resources to produce, could work in China.
American history, however, is steeped with a taste for burgers and steaks. Whether the looming threat of climate change is enough of a catalyst to change U.S. palates remains, for now, unclear.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.