Inside Democrats’ Plan to Oust Pennsylvania’s Governor

National Journal
Jason Plautz Ben Geman
April 14, 2014, 3:43 p.m.

HAR­RIS­BURG, Pa. — Tom Corbett is very proud of Pennsylvania’s frack­ing boom, and the Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor hopes to ride it to a second term in of­fice.

Demo­crats have oth­er plans: They think they can use the boom — or rather, Corbett’s hand­ling of it — to oust the in­cum­bent.

And therein lies the en­ergy mes­saging war of this state’s hotly con­tested gubernat­ori­al race. Corbett says he’s been a cata­lyst for jobs and de­vel­op­ment tied to the state’s nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion surge. But Demo­crats say the gov­ernor’s cozy re­la­tion­ship with the in­dustry is leav­ing cit­izens on the short end of the stick as the state gives up its gas sup­plies.

To that end, every Demo­crat in the crowded primary race want en­ergy com­pan­ies to pay a new tax on their nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion. The pro­ceeds from the pro­posed “sev­er­ance” tax on the value of gas pro­duced would help fund edu­ca­tion, in­fra­struc­ture, and oth­er needs.

Many oth­er en­ergy-pro­du­cing states have such a policy, and Demo­crats ar­gue that by re­fus­ing to push for one in Pennsylvania, the gov­ernor is giv­ing en­ergy com­pan­ies a break at the ex­pense of oth­er crit­ic­al needs.

The party thinks it’s a win­ning line of at­tack. “I’ve seen a lot of in­tern­al polling. There’s a reas­on that all the can­did­ates are talk­ing about it,” said Dan Fee, a Demo­crat­ic con­sult­ant who is not af­fil­i­ated with any can­did­ates.

The tax battle is play­ing a prom­in­ent role in the ef­fort to un­seat the vul­ner­able Corbett, who as of Feb­ru­ary held a 36 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing and trailed his Demo­crat­ic rivals in a Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll.

Wheth­er or not Demo­crats’ en­ergy at­tacks are suc­cess­ful, the fact they are em­ploy­ing them at all un­der­scores the changes frack­ing has brought to the state.

Only a dec­ade ago, the no­tion that nat­ur­al-gas policy would play a prom­in­ent role in a Pennsylvania gubernat­ori­al race would have seemed ludicrous. But as in areas across the coun­try af­fected by the frack­ing boom, the spike in en­ergy de­vel­op­ment has re­defined not only the state’s eco­nomy, but also its polit­ics.

Com­pan­ies tap­ping the rich Mar­cel­lus shale form­a­tion have made this the coun­try’s third-largest gas-pro­du­cing state in 2012, and ac­cord­ing to state of­fi­cials, Pennsylvania vaul­ted past Louisi­ana for the No. 2 slot last year. That’s up from sixth as re­cently as 2011 and four­teenth in 2008, the year the Key­stone State’s frack­ing-en­abled gas boom took off, ac­cord­ing to the fed­er­al En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

With all that pro­duc­tion, Demo­crats see an av­en­ue for rev­en­ue.

The sev­er­ance tax came up quickly when three of the four Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates squared off at a de­bate at Widen­er Uni­versity’s law school here in the state cap­it­al last Wed­nes­day.

“When I go around the state, this is a really pop­u­lar is­sue, and es­pe­cially if you are go­ing to use [a tax] to fund something like pub­lic edu­ca­tion,” said Tom Wolf, the state’s former rev­en­ue sec­ret­ary who is ahead of his primary rivals and Corbett in re­cent polls.

Wolf has pro­posed a 5 per­cent sev­er­ance tax for drillers, as have his fel­low primary can­did­ates Katie Mc­Ginty, a former head of the state’s De­part­ment of En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion, and five-term Rep. Allyson Schwartz. The can­did­ates say that would be com­pet­it­ive with Mar­cel­lus-re­gion neigh­bor West Vir­gin­ia. And more broadly, many oth­er oil-and-gas-pro­du­cing states have sev­er­ance taxes.

State Treas­urer Rob Mc­Cord has pro­posed a 10 per­cent tax.

All the cam­paigns say their plan would provide a ma­jor boost for state cof­fers. For in­stance, Schwartz’s cam­paign, cit­ing fig­ures from the left-lean­ing Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Cen­ter, es­tim­ates that her plan would bring in over $600 mil­lion in its first year and reach over $2 bil­lion in a dec­ade.

Corbett un­abashedly op­poses a sev­er­ance tax. In­stead, he ar­gues his policies foster de­vel­op­ment while bring­ing in sub­stan­tial rev­en­ue.

He’s tout­ing state “im­pact fees” for each well that drillers pay un­der a Corbett-backed 2012 state law that over­hauled the state’s oil and gas rules.

The total fees — which fund in­fra­struc­ture, en­vir­on­ment­al, and oth­er state and loc­al pro­grams — are ex­pec­ted to be $225 mil­lion this year and totaled an­oth­er $406 mil­lion over the pri­or two years, ac­cord­ing to the Corbett ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Sixty per­cent of the money goes dir­ectly back to counties where drilling oc­curs.

“Gov­ernor Corbett has worked to en­sure we are safely and re­spons­ibly us­ing our nat­ur­al re­sources to re­duce en­ergy prices for fam­il­ies and small busi­nesses, grow our eco­nomy, and cre­ate fam­ily-sus­tain­ing jobs,” said Corbett cam­paign spokes­man Billy Pit­man.

“Our lib­er­al Demo­crat­ic op­pon­ents have nev­er seen a tax in­crease they didn’t like,” he said. The Corbett cam­paign last year blas­ted then-front-run­ner Schwartz when she pro­posed her sev­er­ance tax, ar­guing that it would “tax the in­dustry out of our state.”

And the state’s power­ful nat­ur­al-gas in­dustry is in Corbett’s corner. The Mar­cel­lus Shale Co­ali­tion, an in­dustry group, said adding new taxes would jeop­ard­ize the “shared, broad-based be­ne­fits” from the state’s gas boom. The group, which rep­res­ents gas pro­du­cers like Ches­apeake En­ergy, Range Re­sources, and Ex­xon sub­si­di­ary XTO En­ergy.

Even if Demo­crats are suc­cess­ful in their en­ergy mes­saging, con­cen­trat­ing solely on frack­ing would be a fool’s er­rand: Late March polling by the Cen­ter for Opin­ion Re­search at Frank­lin & Mar­shall Col­lege shows that just 5 per­cent of Demo­crat­ic voters list en­ergy is­sues as the most im­port­ant thing fa­cing the state’s voters today.

But the same poll sug­gests the can­did­ates could tap much deep­er in­to the pop­u­lar in­terest by con­nect­ing the is­sue to edu­ca­tion, as 32 per­cent of re­spond­ents called fund­ing for schools a top pri­or­ity.

“The Demo­crats have made a big deal of the sev­er­ance tax be­cause most of them want to use it for edu­ca­tion fund­ing,” said G. Terry Madonna, head of Frank­lin & Mar­shall’s Cen­ter for Polit­ics and Pub­lic Af­fairs and dir­ect­or of the polling.

Ul­ti­mately, however, a sev­er­ance tax may be a polit­ic­al battle that nev­er ma­ter­i­al­izes in­to policy. Even should a Demo­crat take the state’s highest of­fice, Madonna cau­tions that sev­er­ance taxes would face an up­hill battle in the state’s GOP-con­trolled le­gis­lature.

The state’s con­ser­vat­ive House is un­likely to pass the meas­ure, Madonna said, adding he was doubt­ful the tax could sur­vive even in the state’s more mod­er­ate Sen­ate.

What We're Following See More »
ONE MORE INVESTIGATION
IRS Investigating Clinton Foundation
31 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Investigations are never far from the Clintons, and here's another: At the behest of "dozens" of Republican lawmakers, the IRS is opening a fraud investigation into the Clinton Foundation."The move signals a shift from the IRS's announcement last year that it would not look into allegations of financial irregularities at the well-connected charity."

Source:
INFIGHTING AMONG COMMISSIONERS TO BLAME
Report Details Terrible Morale at FEC
39 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Bickering commissioners, ineffective managers and lousy internal communication rank among the top reasons why the Federal Election Commission" has some of the worst morale in the federal government. That's the conclusion of an inspector general's report, which put "the most blame on the FEC’s six commissioners: three Democratic appointees and three Republican appointees who have regularly criticized one another and frequently (but not exclusively) deadlocked on high-profile political issues before them."

Source:
TRADE DEALS BACK IN THE NEWS
UAW President: Clinton Promised to Renegotiate NAFTA
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

On Tuesday, Dennis Williams, the president of the United Auto Workers, said that Hillary Clinton has told him that she will renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement if elected president. Trade deals, especially NAFTA, have played a prominent role in the campaign, with Clinton receiving heat both from her Democratic rival Bernie Sanders and GOP nominee Donald Trump. The Clinton campaign did not comment on Williams's comments, though that didn't stop the Trump campaign from weighing in. Hillary Clinton "will never renegotiate Bill Clinton's NAFTA," said Stephen Miller, senior policy adviser to Trump.

Source:
CONTRACTS MAY NOT BE RENEWED
Senate Contractors Short Cafeteria Workers by $1 Million
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Labor Department announced Tuesday that federal contractors had shorted 674 Senate cafeteria workers to the tune of $1 million. Two companies, Restaurant Associates and its subcontractor, Personnel Plus, violated the law by misclassifying workers into lower-paying positions and having them work off the clock, the agency said." The department is looking into whether to renew the contracts.

Source:
ASSANGE WANTS TO CRIPPLE CLINTON’S CHANCES
Spy Agencies Hone in on Russia as Culprit of DNC Hack
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"American intelligence agencies have told the White House they now have 'high confidence' that the Russian government was behind the theft of emails and documents from the Democratic National Committee, according to federal officials who have been briefed on the evidence. But intelligence agencies have cautioned that they are uncertain whether the electronic break-in at the committee's computer systems was intended as fairly routine cyberespionage—of the kind the United States also conducts around the world—or as part of an effort to manipulate the 2016 presidential election." WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange "has made it clear that he hoped to harm Hillary Clinton's chances of winning the presidency."

Source:
×