Inside Democrats’ Plan to Oust Pennsylvania’s Governor

National Journal
Jason Plautz Ben Geman
April 14, 2014, 3:43 p.m.

HAR­RIS­BURG, Pa. — Tom Corbett is very proud of Pennsylvania’s frack­ing boom, and the Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor hopes to ride it to a second term in of­fice.

Demo­crats have oth­er plans: They think they can use the boom — or rather, Corbett’s hand­ling of it — to oust the in­cum­bent.

And therein lies the en­ergy mes­saging war of this state’s hotly con­tested gubernat­ori­al race. Corbett says he’s been a cata­lyst for jobs and de­vel­op­ment tied to the state’s nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion surge. But Demo­crats say the gov­ernor’s cozy re­la­tion­ship with the in­dustry is leav­ing cit­izens on the short end of the stick as the state gives up its gas sup­plies.

To that end, every Demo­crat in the crowded primary race want en­ergy com­pan­ies to pay a new tax on their nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion. The pro­ceeds from the pro­posed “sev­er­ance” tax on the value of gas pro­duced would help fund edu­ca­tion, in­fra­struc­ture, and oth­er needs.

Many oth­er en­ergy-pro­du­cing states have such a policy, and Demo­crats ar­gue that by re­fus­ing to push for one in Pennsylvania, the gov­ernor is giv­ing en­ergy com­pan­ies a break at the ex­pense of oth­er crit­ic­al needs.

The party thinks it’s a win­ning line of at­tack. “I’ve seen a lot of in­tern­al polling. There’s a reas­on that all the can­did­ates are talk­ing about it,” said Dan Fee, a Demo­crat­ic con­sult­ant who is not af­fil­i­ated with any can­did­ates.

The tax battle is play­ing a prom­in­ent role in the ef­fort to un­seat the vul­ner­able Corbett, who as of Feb­ru­ary held a 36 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing and trailed his Demo­crat­ic rivals in a Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll.

Wheth­er or not Demo­crats’ en­ergy at­tacks are suc­cess­ful, the fact they are em­ploy­ing them at all un­der­scores the changes frack­ing has brought to the state.

Only a dec­ade ago, the no­tion that nat­ur­al-gas policy would play a prom­in­ent role in a Pennsylvania gubernat­ori­al race would have seemed ludicrous. But as in areas across the coun­try af­fected by the frack­ing boom, the spike in en­ergy de­vel­op­ment has re­defined not only the state’s eco­nomy, but also its polit­ics.

Com­pan­ies tap­ping the rich Mar­cel­lus shale form­a­tion have made this the coun­try’s third-largest gas-pro­du­cing state in 2012, and ac­cord­ing to state of­fi­cials, Pennsylvania vaul­ted past Louisi­ana for the No. 2 slot last year. That’s up from sixth as re­cently as 2011 and four­teenth in 2008, the year the Key­stone State’s frack­ing-en­abled gas boom took off, ac­cord­ing to the fed­er­al En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

With all that pro­duc­tion, Demo­crats see an av­en­ue for rev­en­ue.

The sev­er­ance tax came up quickly when three of the four Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates squared off at a de­bate at Widen­er Uni­versity’s law school here in the state cap­it­al last Wed­nes­day.

“When I go around the state, this is a really pop­u­lar is­sue, and es­pe­cially if you are go­ing to use [a tax] to fund something like pub­lic edu­ca­tion,” said Tom Wolf, the state’s former rev­en­ue sec­ret­ary who is ahead of his primary rivals and Corbett in re­cent polls.

Wolf has pro­posed a 5 per­cent sev­er­ance tax for drillers, as have his fel­low primary can­did­ates Katie Mc­Ginty, a former head of the state’s De­part­ment of En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion, and five-term Rep. Allyson Schwartz. The can­did­ates say that would be com­pet­it­ive with Mar­cel­lus-re­gion neigh­bor West Vir­gin­ia. And more broadly, many oth­er oil-and-gas-pro­du­cing states have sev­er­ance taxes.

State Treas­urer Rob Mc­Cord has pro­posed a 10 per­cent tax.

All the cam­paigns say their plan would provide a ma­jor boost for state cof­fers. For in­stance, Schwartz’s cam­paign, cit­ing fig­ures from the left-lean­ing Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Cen­ter, es­tim­ates that her plan would bring in over $600 mil­lion in its first year and reach over $2 bil­lion in a dec­ade.

Corbett un­abashedly op­poses a sev­er­ance tax. In­stead, he ar­gues his policies foster de­vel­op­ment while bring­ing in sub­stan­tial rev­en­ue.

He’s tout­ing state “im­pact fees” for each well that drillers pay un­der a Corbett-backed 2012 state law that over­hauled the state’s oil and gas rules.

The total fees — which fund in­fra­struc­ture, en­vir­on­ment­al, and oth­er state and loc­al pro­grams — are ex­pec­ted to be $225 mil­lion this year and totaled an­oth­er $406 mil­lion over the pri­or two years, ac­cord­ing to the Corbett ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Sixty per­cent of the money goes dir­ectly back to counties where drilling oc­curs.

“Gov­ernor Corbett has worked to en­sure we are safely and re­spons­ibly us­ing our nat­ur­al re­sources to re­duce en­ergy prices for fam­il­ies and small busi­nesses, grow our eco­nomy, and cre­ate fam­ily-sus­tain­ing jobs,” said Corbett cam­paign spokes­man Billy Pit­man.

“Our lib­er­al Demo­crat­ic op­pon­ents have nev­er seen a tax in­crease they didn’t like,” he said. The Corbett cam­paign last year blas­ted then-front-run­ner Schwartz when she pro­posed her sev­er­ance tax, ar­guing that it would “tax the in­dustry out of our state.”

And the state’s power­ful nat­ur­al-gas in­dustry is in Corbett’s corner. The Mar­cel­lus Shale Co­ali­tion, an in­dustry group, said adding new taxes would jeop­ard­ize the “shared, broad-based be­ne­fits” from the state’s gas boom. The group, which rep­res­ents gas pro­du­cers like Ches­apeake En­ergy, Range Re­sources, and Ex­xon sub­si­di­ary XTO En­ergy.

Even if Demo­crats are suc­cess­ful in their en­ergy mes­saging, con­cen­trat­ing solely on frack­ing would be a fool’s er­rand: Late March polling by the Cen­ter for Opin­ion Re­search at Frank­lin & Mar­shall Col­lege shows that just 5 per­cent of Demo­crat­ic voters list en­ergy is­sues as the most im­port­ant thing fa­cing the state’s voters today.

But the same poll sug­gests the can­did­ates could tap much deep­er in­to the pop­u­lar in­terest by con­nect­ing the is­sue to edu­ca­tion, as 32 per­cent of re­spond­ents called fund­ing for schools a top pri­or­ity.

“The Demo­crats have made a big deal of the sev­er­ance tax be­cause most of them want to use it for edu­ca­tion fund­ing,” said G. Terry Madonna, head of Frank­lin & Mar­shall’s Cen­ter for Polit­ics and Pub­lic Af­fairs and dir­ect­or of the polling.

Ul­ti­mately, however, a sev­er­ance tax may be a polit­ic­al battle that nev­er ma­ter­i­al­izes in­to policy. Even should a Demo­crat take the state’s highest of­fice, Madonna cau­tions that sev­er­ance taxes would face an up­hill battle in the state’s GOP-con­trolled le­gis­lature.

The state’s con­ser­vat­ive House is un­likely to pass the meas­ure, Madonna said, adding he was doubt­ful the tax could sur­vive even in the state’s more mod­er­ate Sen­ate.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×