GM Head Offers Few Answers as Lawmakers Ask Who’s to Blame

Faulty ignition switches caused at least a dozen deaths. Congress wants to know why the company ignored the problem for so long.

General Motors CEO Mary Barra testifies Tuesday on ignition switch problems that led to numerous fatalities.
National Journal
Alex Brown
April 1, 2014, 12:48 p.m.

Le­gis­lat­ors pressed the head of Gen­er­al Mo­tors Tues­day to dis­close who knew what and when re­gard­ing the auto­maker’s faulty ig­ni­tion switches that led to at least a dozen deaths. The an­swer, for the most part: Stay tuned.

GM CEO Mary Barra told a House sub­com­mit­tee her com­pany’s in­tern­al in­vest­ig­a­tion is on­go­ing, pledging to provide an­swers on the dec­ade­long prob­lem that only re­cently led to the re­call of mil­lions of cars.

Time after time, Barra re­spon­ded to ques­tions with some ver­sion of “I don’t know,” but prom­ised that an im­proved cor­por­ate cul­ture since she took GM’s helm earli­er this year would yield an­swers and pre­vent fu­ture prob­lems. For many ques­tions, Barra al­luded to the in­vest­ig­a­tion be­ing con­duc­ted by former U.S. At­tor­ney Ant­on Valu­kas, say­ing his re­port will shed more light on the quer­ies she was un­able to an­swer.

That wasn’t good enough for some le­gis­lat­ors. “I hold in my hands a Feb­ru­ary re­port and a March re­port to [the Na­tion­al High­way Traffic Safety Ad­min­is­tra­tion],” said Rep. Paul Tonko. “I’m con­fused some­what about that fair amount of know­ledge that has been form­ally ex­changed to NHTSA. At the same time, we’re hear­ing, ‘We don’t know un­til the in­vest­ig­a­tion is com­plete.’ There’s a con­flict here.”

Rep. Tim Murphy, chair of the Over­sight and In­vest­ig­a­tions Sub­com­mit­tee of the En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee, asked Barra if she’d even read the re­port that GM sub­mit­ted to the com­mit­tee. Barra said she hadn’t, cit­ing its 200,000-page length.

The prob­lem stemmed from GM’s small-vehicle line. A faulty spring in some cars’ ig­ni­tion switches led the vehicles to shut off after bumps, killing the en­gine and in­hib­it­ing brak­ing, steer­ing, and airbag de­ploy­ment.

As far back as 2002, GM knew that the switch was not up to its spe­cific­a­tions. En­gin­eers looked at the prob­lem in 2004 and 2005, ul­ti­mately de­cid­ing to ad­vise drivers to keep heavy ob­jects off their key chains.

Then in 2007, NHTSA was made aware of fatal­it­ies res­ult­ing from the ig­ni­tion flaw, but did not in­vest­ig­ate fur­ther. Not un­til Feb­ru­ary did GM be­gin to is­sue re­calls on its vehicles.

The cost to re­place an ig­ni­tion switch totaled no more than a couple dol­lars, said En­ergy and Com­merce rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man. Barra said cost con­sid­er­a­tions over­rid­ing safety con­cerns would be a ser­i­ous prob­lem if it proved to be true.

Dur­ing the hear­ing, Barra also re­vealed that at­tor­ney Ken­neth Fein­berg would ad­vise GM on com­pens­a­tion for vic­tims.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×