BRUSSELS — President Obama didn’t directly call Wednesday for Europe to start fracking for shale gas, but he strongly suggested that countries there diversify their energy sources as the European Union hits Russia with sanctions over its annexation of Crimea.
Russia’s aggression in Crimea has highlighted the E.U.’s dependence on gas that travels through pipelines in Ukraine. Isolating Russia economically would be less painful for Europe if it did not depend so heavily on that gas, Obama said at a press conference with European Council President Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso.
“This entire event has pointed to, I think, for Europe, how it needs to diversify its energy sources,” Obama said.
Declining to specifically endorse fracking, Obama said the U.S. has been “blessed by some incredible resources” recently.
Barroso, however, made clear his support for fracking, saying it was a “blessing” for countries that import gas from the U.S. rather than Russia.
“European countries will become less dependent on energy coming from, let’s say, difficult spots,” he said.
The statement also hinted at negotiations on the free-trade Transatlantic Trade and Investment Program. President Obama suggested that U.S. liquefied gas exports to the E.U. could increase depending on the contents of the deal, which could reduce tariffs and regulations in trade between the U.S. and E.U.
British Prime Minister David Cameron has also called for fracking in Europe since the crisis in Crimea began. On Tuesday, he said Russia’s invasion was a “wake-up call” for countries relying on Russia gas, Reuters reported.
Obama walked a fine line on environmental issues in the press conference, both promoting the U.S.’s gas exports and assuring Europeans that the United States would not push for more-lax European laws on environmental protection as part of the free-trade deal. He addressed European concerns that the U.S. would try to reduce barriers to trade by asking for weakened environmental regulations, saying he has fought for environmental protections during his “entire political career.”
But Obama also subtly criticized the E.U. for heavily favoring environmental regulation over energy production, saying the U.S. had made tough choices that the E.U. now faces.
“The truth of the matter is, just as there’s no easy, free, simple way to defend ourselves, there’s no perfect, free, ideal, cheap energy sources,” he said. “Every possible energy source has some inconveniences or downsides. And I think Europe is going to have to examine, in light of what’s happened, their energy policies to find, are there additional ways that they can diversify and accelerate energy independence.”
Neither Obama, Barroso, nor Van Rompuy addressed whether the U.S. and E.U. see Crimea as a lost cause, instead focusing on the possibility of additional sanctions if Russia becomes aggressive toward any other parts of Ukraine. Obama, who was attending the E.U. summit for the first time as president, emphasized the U.S.’s coordination with the E.U. on sanctions.
Obama also declined to address worries in Europe over U.S. spying programs. Barroso said he and Van Rompuy have “concerns, shared widely by citizens in E.U. member states,” about U.S. surveillance, but that they had discussed the issue with Obama earlier in the day and are confident about Obama’s proposals for NSA reforms — including ending the agency’s mass collection of phone data.
What We're Following See More »
"As Donald Trump captures the mantle of presumptive Republican nominee, a new poll finds he begins his general election campaign well behind Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. The new CNN/ORC Poll, completed ahead of Trump's victory last night, found Clinton leads 54% to 41%, a 13-point edge over the New York businessman, her largest lead since last July. Clinton is also more trusted than Trump on many issues voters rank as critically important, with one big exception. By a 50% to 45% margin, voters say Trump would do a better job handling the economy than Clinton would."
In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal sets out to relieve conservatives of the temptation to back a third-party candidate over Donald Trump. "The thought is more tempting this year than most, but it’s still hard to see how this would accomplish more than electing Hillary Clinton and muddling the message from a Trump defeat. ... The usual presidential result is that the party that splinters hands the election to the other, more united party." But in the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol is having none of it: "Serious people, including serious conservatives, cannot acquiesce in Donald Trump as their candidate. ... Donald Trump should not be president of the United States. The Wall Street Journal cannot bring itself to say that. We can say it, we do say it, and we are proud to act accordingly."
- Nate Cohn, New York Times: "There have been 10-point shifts over the general election season before, even if it’s uncommon. But there isn’t much of a precedent for huge swings in races with candidates as well known as Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. A majority of Americans may not like her, but they say they’re scared of him."
- Roger Simon, PJ Media: "He is particularly fortunate that his opposition, Hillary Clinton, besides still being under threat of indictment and still not having defeated Bernie Sanders (go figure), is a truly uninspiring, almost soporific, figure. ... She's not a star. Trump is. All attention will be on him in the general election. The primaries have shown us what an advantage that is. What that means for American politics may not all be good, but it's true."
- The editors, The Washington Examiner: "At the very least, Trump owes it to the country he boasts he will 'make great again' to try to demonstrate some seriousness about the office he seeks. He owes this even to those who will never consider voting for him. He can start by swearing off grand displays of aggressive and apparently deliberate ignorance. This is not too much to ask."
Humana announced it plans to "exit certain statewide individual markets and products 'both on and off [Obamacare] exchange,' the insurer said in its financial results released Monday." The company also said price hikes may be forthcoming, "commensurate with anticipated levels of risk by state." Its individual-market enrollment was down 21% in the first quarter from a year ago.