Here’s How Vladimir Putin Got Involved in a Colorado Senate Race

With Russia making moves, two candidates are racing to trumpet their (nearly identical) plans to push back.

Russian President Vladimir Putin.  
National Journal
Ben Geman and Patrick Reis
March 26, 2014, 1 a.m.

Sen­ate Demo­crat Mark Ud­all wants the people of Col­or­ado to know that he sup­ports the U.S. ex­port­ing nat­ur­al gas. House Re­pub­lic­an Cory Gard­ner wants them to know that he also backs that plan.

But that’s not the only de­sire they share: Both want to win Ud­all’s Sen­ate seat in the Novem­ber elec­tion.

And with sup­port for nat­ur­al-gas ex­ports newly in vogue in Con­gress thanks to Vladi­mir Putin’s ag­gress­ive moves in Rus­sia, both can­did­ates are ra­cing for the role of ex­ports’ biggest sup­port­er.

Ud­all is claim­ing that he planted the flag first, point­ing to a bill he in­tro­duced March 5 that would ex­ped­ite En­ergy De­part­ment ap­prov­al of gas ex­ports to World Trade Or­gan­iz­a­tion mem­bers. Gard­ner in­tro­duced a sim­il­ar meas­ure March 6, but Ud­all took a Tues­day Sen­ate hear­ing as an op­por­tun­ity to note his chro­no­lo­gic­al su­prem­acy.

“Shortly after in­tro­du­cing my le­gis­la­tion, my home-state col­league Rep­res­ent­at­ive Gard­ner presen­ted a vir­tu­ally identic­al meas­ure in the House which will be marked up soon, and I wel­come him in join­ing me in this ef­fort,” Ud­all said at a Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee hear­ing on gas ex­ports Tues­day. Gard­ner was un­avail­able for com­ment.

So what does any of this have to do with Putin?

Part of Rus­sia’s power stems from its abund­ance of fossil-fuel re­serves, par­tic­u­larly nat­ur­al gas. And as Europe has at­temp­ted to brush back Putin from his ag­gress­ive moves in Crimea, the fact that the con­tin­ent de­pends on Rus­si­an nat­ur­al gas has provided Putin more lever­age.

Nobody be­lieves that the U.S. can in­stantly break Rus­sia’s gas grip with its own ex­ports: The ter­min­als needed to ex­port mean­ing­ful quant­it­ies would take years to come on­line. But, as the think­ing goes, a pro-ex­port policy would in the long run di­lute Putin’s petro power — and bold moves now would send the Rus­si­an pres­id­ent an im­me­di­ate sig­nal.

Ud­all and Gard­ner have both sup­por­ted gas ex­ports for years. Their state is a heavy nat­ur­al-gas pro­du­cer, and would stand to be­ne­fit from the in­creased de­mand of for­eign mar­kets. But with Putin loom­ing large in the na­tion­al con­ver­sa­tion, their mes­saging has taken on new ur­gency, even to the point that one can­did­ate will point out that he got a one-day jump on his com­pet­it­or to file nearly identic­al le­gis­la­tion.

Mem­bers of Con­gress from both parties have been in­tro­du­cing pro-ex­port le­gis­la­tion for years. But in a hy­per-com­pet­it­ive polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment, com­bined with a tight race in a purple state, can­did­ates are in­clined to take every inch (or day) they can get.

And even this time around, the Col­or­ado can­did­ates were only part of a crowded field in ra­cing to to file pro-ex­port le­gis­la­tion. Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mi­chael Turn­er of Ohio filed a nearly identic­al meas­ure on March 4 — two days be­fore Gard­ner, and one be­fore Ud­all.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4843) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×