Former Obama Science Official Backs Keystone XL Pipeline

Pipe is stacked at the southern site of the Keystone XL pipeline on March 22, 2012 in Cushing, Oklahoma. U.S. President Barack Obama is pressing federal agencies to expedite the section of the Keystone XL pipeline between Oklahoma and the Gulf Coast.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Feb. 20, 2014, 1:14 p.m.

Mar­cia McNutt, a sci­ent­ist who headed the U.S. Geo­lo­gic­al Sur­vey un­der Pres­id­ent Obama un­til early 2013, an­nounced Thursday that she now sup­ports ap­prov­al of the Key­stone XL oil pipeline.

McNutt is now the top ed­it­or at Sci­ence magazine. In an ed­it­or­i­al pub­lished there Thursday, McNutt de­scribes how she has come to back the pro­ject that she pre­vi­ously op­posed, and does not be­lieve it would worsen green­house-gas emis­sions.

“This po­s­i­tion may seem in­con­gru­ous with my per­son­al cru­sade to min­im­ize fossil fuel use, a de­sire rooted in sci­entif­ic un­der­stand­ing that cli­mate change is a real threat and that tar sands oil pro­duces high­er GHG emis­sions than many al­tern­at­ives,” writes McNutt.

But McNutt goes on to say she’s now con­vinced that build­ing Key­stone would not speed up oil sands de­vel­op­ment, and notes that de­veloper Tran­sCanada changed the ini­tial pro­posed route to avoid an eco­lo­gic­ally sens­it­ive re­gion of Neb­raska.

“No”¨ meth­od for mov­ing hy­dro­car­bons can be con­sidered com­pletely fail-safe. At least the cur­rent per­mit­ting pro­cess can, and should, be used to en­sure that Key­stone XL sets new stand­ards for en­vir­on­ment­al safety. There is no sim­il­ar lever­age on the truck and rail trans­port­a­tion op­tions, which pro­duce high­er GHG emis­sions and have a great­er risk of spills, at a high­er cost for trans­port,” she writes.

McNutt also served as sci­ence ad­viser to former In­teri­or Sec­ret­ary Ken Salaz­ar when both were in the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

McNutt, who holds a Ph.D. in earth sci­ences from the Scripps In­sti­tu­tion of Ocean­o­graphy, is now one of sev­er­al former Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials who have weighed in on Key­stone as the fed­er­al re­view con­tin­ues.

Salaz­ar said this month that he be­lieves Key­stone should be built, and former Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Tom Doni­lon re­cently said he would re­com­mend ap­prov­al if he were still in the ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Former cli­mate czar Car­ol Brown­er and former White House spokes­man Bill Bur­ton are among the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion vet­er­ans who op­pose Key­stone.

McNutt be­lieves there should be some strings at­tached to ap­prov­al of Key­stone, Tran­sCanada’s pro­ject that would bring oil from Al­berta’s oil-sands pro­jects to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies.

She sug­ges­ted that Obama could link ap­prov­al to “con­ces­sions” and policies that help spur green-en­ergy de­vel­op­ment and stem car­bon emis­sions.

“As part of a com­prom­ise to al­low the pro­ject to move for­ward, let’s now in­sist on an in­come stream from Key­stone XL rev­en­ues to sup­port in­vest­ment in re­new­able en­ergy sources to se­cure our en­ergy fu­ture,” she writes.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×