A Nebraska judge on Wednesday threw out a state law authorizing Republican Gov. Dave Heineman’s approval of a path for the Keystone XL pipeline through the state, The Washington Post reports.
District Court Judge Stephanie F. Stacy concluded that the law violated the state constitution, and stated that jurisdiction for route approval rests instead with the Nebraska Public Service Commission.
Heineman quickly told the court he would appeal the decision.
The decision is another bump in the road for the controversial proposed pipeline, which would transport crude from Alberta’s oil sands to Gulf Coast refineries. Final authority to approve or reject the project rests with President Obama because it would cross the U.S.-Canada border, and the project is under State Department review.
According to the Omaha World-Herald, the ruling won’t impact an executive-branch determination on the project, but it will likely compel TransCanada, the company set to build the pipeline, to go back to the drawing board in Nebraska and ask the state to reapprove the route.
TransCanada said of the decision: “We are disappointed and disagree with the decision. We will now analyze the judgment and decide what next steps may be taken. TransCanada continues to believe strongly in Keystone XL and the benefits it would provide to Americans — thousands of jobs and a secure supply of crude oil from a trusted neighbour in Canada.”
An environmentalist battling Keystone called on the State Department to stop the clock on its review.
Anthony Swift, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, called for the State Department to pause in order to “give Nebraska the opportunity to determine Keystone XL’s route in accordance with its laws.”
The State Department is conducting a 90-day review to determine whether approving Keystone is in the “national interest,” a process set in motion by the Jan. 31 release of a final environmental impact analysis.
The consulting firm ClearView Energy Partners on Thursday said the court decision could delay the federal review while questions about approval of the pipeline route through Nebraska are worked out.
“Yesterday’s ruling could give the State Department and the White House a reason to extend the ongoing National Interest Determination process,” the firm said in a short analysis.
Ben Geman contributed.
What We're Following See More »
The great restroom war of 2016 continues apace, as eleven states have sued the Obama administration in federal court, claiming its federal guidance on how schools should accommodate transgender students "has no basis in law." "The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has worked to turn workplaces and schools 'into laboratories for a massive social experiment.'"
By a 29-10 vote, the House Natural Resources Committee today passed the bill to allow Puerto Rico to restructure its $70 billion in debt. The legislation "would establish an oversight board to help the commonwealth restructure its un-payable debt and craft an economic recovery plan."
"Though every major party nominee since 1976 has released his tax returns while running for president, the practice has never been required by law. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to change that. The senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, which handles tax issues, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would force presidential candidates to release their most recent tax returns. The Presidential Tax Transparency Act, as the bill is called, would require candidates to make their latest three years of tax returns public no later than 15 days after becoming the nominee."
"The U.S. Capitol does not meet the federal government’s own standards for accommodations for new mothers," according to an investigation by NBC Channel 4. "Though the U.S. General Services Administration, a government agency which oversees the management of federal government buildings, requires a minimum number of lactation stations and changing tables, Congress is exempt from the rules and fails to meet those standards." The Capitol grounds have 12 lactations stations, far short of the 42 that would be required given the number of female workers there.