A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Interior Department botched an environmental analysis underpinning the 2008 sale of oil-drilling leases in Arctic waters off Alaska’s coast.
The decision, from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, about the sale of leases in the Chukchi Sea arrives as Royal Dutch Shell is weighing resumption of attempts to drill for oil in the region.
Bloomberg unwraps the divided decision here, noting it could delay drilling efforts by companies including Shell and ConocoPhillips that bought leases in the contested 2008 sale.
The court found that Interior wrongly based its environmental analysis on an estimate of 1 billion barrels of recoverable oil from the Chukchi leases, a figure green groups that sued the department called too low.
“[W]e agree with plaintiffs that the agency’s estimate of one billion barrels was chosen arbitrarily, and that this arbitrary decision meant that the agency based its decision on inadequate information about the amount of oil to be produced pursuant to the lease sale,” the decision states.
Shell, which is mulling another stab at drilling off the U.S. coast in the Arctic after a series of mishaps in 2012, told the Associated Press that it’s reviewing the decision.
Environmental groups cheered the ruling and quickly sought to use it as political ammunition in their campaign against Arctic drilling, which they contend is too risky.
“This decision gives the White House a chance to reconsider drilling in the Chukchi,” said National Audubon Society CEO David Yarnold, whose group is among the organizations that brought the case against Interior.
Environmentalists have urged Interior to reject Shell’s efforts to drill its existing leases in the region. They’re also calling on the Obama administration to back off plans to sell new leases in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off Alaska’s coast in 2016 and 2017.
- 1 Bull’s Eye: Here’s the Obamas’ New Neighborhood
- 2 Why Gun Control Can’t Eliminate Gun Violence
- 3 How the New Republican Debate Criteria Will Change the Way Candidates Campaign
- 4 What’s Behind Rand Paul’s Staffing Strategy?
- 5 Why Presidential Candidates Are Raising Millions of Dollars They’ll Never Use
What We're Following See More »
Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”
"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.
"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."
"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.