Battle Over EPA Smog Rule Intensifies

None

Silhouetted against the sky at dusk, emissions spew from the smokestacks at Westar Energy's Jeffrey Energy Center coal-fired power plant near St. Mary's, Kan. Saturday, Sept. 25, 2010.  (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)
National Journal
Ben Geman
Jan. 22, 2014, 1:37 a.m.

En­vir­on­ment­al and pub­lic health groups want a fed­er­al court to force the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency to is­sue tough­er stand­ards for smog-form­ing pol­lu­tion.

The Amer­ic­an Lung As­so­ci­ation, the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil, and oth­er groups in a court fil­ing Tues­day, ask a fed­er­al judge to re­quire EPA to pro­pose new ozone stand­ards by Dec. 1, 2014, and fin­ish them 10 months later.

“The longer Amer­ic­ans must wait for the EPA to strengthen the stand­ards, the longer they must breathe air pol­lu­tion that shortens their lives, wor­sens lung dis­ease, makes it harder for them to breathe, and threatens car­di­ovas­cu­lar harm,” the Amer­ic­an Lung As­so­ci­ation said in a state­ment Tues­day even­ing.

The fil­ing is the latest twist in the in­tense, years-long leg­al and lob­by­ing battle over EPA ozone reg­u­la­tions. It’s a fight that has drawn high-level White House in­volve­ment over the past sev­er­al years.

Pres­id­ent Obama, in 2011, scuttled EPA plans to toughen George W. Bush-era stand­ards but noted that EPA would re­vis­it the rules in 2013.

The 2011 White House ac­tion fol­lowed heavy lob­by­ing by in­dustry groups, such as the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Man­u­fac­tur­ers, that say fur­ther tight­en­ing of the rules would hobble the eco­nomy.

EPA, un­der the Clean Air Act, must re­view ozone stand­ards every five years.

The green groups’ fil­ing Tues­day with the U.S. Dis­trict Court for the North­ern Dis­trict of Cali­for­nia says com­ple­tion of that re­view is over­due.

It notes that ozone rules were last pro­mul­gated in mid-March of 2008 and that “there is no dis­pute that EPA has failed to com­plete its re­view.”

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×