Waxman Rails Against Bill to Block Power-Plant Regs

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Jan. 14, 2014, 7:56 a.m.

House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, D-Cal­if., slammed lower-cham­ber con­ser­vat­ives on Tues­day for sup­port­ing a bill de­signed to lim­it En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency reg­u­la­tions for new and ex­ist­ing power plants.

Wax­man called the le­gis­la­tion, in­tro­duced in the House and Sen­ate this month by Rep. Ed Whit­field, R-Ky., and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., “a re­cipe for dis­aster.”

“The bill be­fore us would upend the Clean Air Act,” Wax­man said dur­ing a markup of the le­gis­la­tion by the En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee. “Re­pub­lic­ans are start­ing 2014 right where they left off in 2013. They’re deny­ing the sci­ence of cli­mate change, ig­nor­ing the risks, and try­ing to stop the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency from pro­tect­ing the Amer­ic­an people from air pol­lu­tion.”

The bill would block EPA’s pro­posed new source per­form­ance stand­ards for fu­ture power plants. It would also elim­in­ate the reg­u­la­tion’s re­quire­ment that new plants in­stall car­bon-cap­ture-and-stor­age tech­no­logy and give Con­gress the power to de­term­ine a start date for forth­com­ing EPA reg­u­la­tions for ex­ist­ing plants.

Wax­man was the only mem­ber of the pan­el to pro­pose an amend­ment to the bill. The amend­ment stated that lim­its on EPA’s au­thor­ity should not be per­mit­ted to take ef­fect un­til an al­tern­at­ive stand­ard yield­ing the same over­all re­duc­tion in car­bon emis­sions was pro­posed. It failed to pass, however.

Re­pub­lic­ans on the pan­el de­fen­ded the le­gis­la­tion, say­ing that EPA’s stand­ard for fu­ture plants has not yet been com­mer­cially demon­strated and there­fore is not achiev­able.

“When EPA’s pro­pos­al be­comes fi­nal­ized it will be im­possible to build a new coal-fired power plant in this coun­try be­cause the tech­no­logy is not avail­able,” Whit­field, who chairs the sub­com­mit­tee, said in his open­ing state­ment.

The pan­el ad­vanced the bill to the full com­mit­tee on an 18-11 vote.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
17 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
18 hours ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.