The head of the nation’s most powerful business group said Wednesday that he favors ending the ban on U.S. crude-oil exports, joining the nation’s top oil-lobbying group and some senior lawmakers who want to end the decades-old limits.
“I want to lift the ban. I just want to get it done in a reasonable sequence,” said Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
He said the limits won’t be removed “overnight” but predicted, “It is going to happen.”
Donohue, addressing reporters, did not say how much lobbying and advocacy muscle the group will put behind its position.
His remarks arrive a day after the top Republican on the Senate’s energy panel and the American Petroleum Institute called for ending the statutory and policy limits imposed after the OPEC oil embargo of the 1970s.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said Tuesday that the White House should use its administrative discretion to allow crude exports amid surging domestic production, but that Congress should act if the administration doesn’t.
Donohue spoke to reporters after making his annual State of American Business speech.
Karen Harbert, who heads the chamber’s energy program, said in an interview that the group would ultimately like to see Congress lift the export ban.
But she acknowledged that’s unlikely to happen in an election year and said the White House should begin allowing more exports under existing administrative powers.
“In the interim, the administration does have the authority to chip away at this where they determine it is in our national interest,” said Harbert, president of the chamber’s Institute for 21st Century Energy.
The Energy Department predicts the U.S. will pump 9.3 million barrels of oil per day in 2015, the highest level since 1972.
“The market has changed so substantially that it is now incumbent upon us to realize, and the American public to realize, that oil exports are in our national interest,” said Harbert, who was a top adviser at the Energy Department during the George W. Bush administration.
“We have a mismatch between what we are producing and what our refining capacity is, and our refiners are not going to expend a tremendous amount of capital to meet this. We need to adjust to these market inefficiencies, which will benefit the American consumer over time,” she said.
Harbert, like her boss, Donohue, isn’t predicting the U.S. will open the taps to exports quickly, but she said, “The time to begin the discussion is now.”
Promotion of energy exports, including liquefied natural gas and coal, will be part of a broader “Energy Works for US” initiative the chamber’s energy institute will unveil next week, she said.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”