The Environmental Protection Agency released a proposal Friday to tighten and expand air-pollution standards for residential woodstoves and heaters.
The revised standards, once implemented, will result in an 80 percent reduction in emissions of particulate matter released from wood-burners, the agency said in a press release announcing the proposal. EPA also estimates the controls will yield a savings of between $118 to $267 in public-health benefits for each dollar paid out to comply with the regulation.
The agency has the authority to regulate toxic pollutants from woodstoves and heaters manufactured for residential use under the Clean Air Act. Friday’s proposed update marks the first time the agency has moved to strengthen emissions limits since they were first issued in 1988.
In addition to tightening pollution controls, the agency’s proposal casts a wider net than the 1988 standards. The new standard would regulate air pollutants from a number of wood-burning devices not previously covered, including outdoor wood boilers.
The rule does not apply to fireplaces and would only impact woodstoves and heaters made in 2015 or later. Once the proposed rulemaking is published in the Federal Register it will be subject to a 90-day comment period. A final rule is not due out until 2015.
While the news will likely draw criticism from conservative groups wary of federal attempts to regulate air quality, it met with praise from at least one environmental advocacy organization.
“We are delighted that, at long last, the U.S. EPA is moving forward with a proposal to reduce dangerous emissions from residential wood heating devices such as outdoor wood boilers,” Frank O’Donnell, a spokesman for Clean Air Watch, wrote in a blog post on Friday. “Smoke gets in your eyes, as the old song goes,” he continued. “But it also gets in your lungs, where it can cause real damage.”
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.