Are Utilities Wilting From Heat of Solar Competition?

A man brooms in front of a house with solar panels on the roof in Grevenbroich near Aachen, southern Germany on September 11, 2012.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Dec. 23, 2013, 12:36 a.m.

Sol­ar en­ergy has be­come in­creas­ingly power­ful. Its rise to the top, however, hasn’t been without a few bumps along the way. 

Reg­u­lat­ory battles pit­ting the sol­ar in­dustry against power com­pan­ies in a fight over pay­ment mod­els played out in sev­er­al states this year. As the dust settles, sol­ar pro­viders are claim­ing vic­tory. Util­it­ies, on the oth­er hand, are try­ing to re­frame the con­ver­sa­tion en­tirely by in­sist­ing they aren’t an en­emy of the in­dustry.

Much of the de­bate so far has centered around a policy on the books in 43 states called net-meter­ing. Net-meter­ing al­lows rooftop sol­ar own­ers to sell ex­cess elec­tri­city back to the grid, with util­it­ies is­su­ing full re­tail cred­it to the cus­tom­er based on the amount of power they provide.

Util­it­ies are push­ing to scale back or get rid of net-meter­ing, call­ing it a sub­sidy that sol­ar has out­grown. The rooftop sol­ar in­dustry, on the oth­er hand, has res­isted the fight to dis­mantle net-meter­ing, ar­guing that it’s an equit­able way of pay­ing for power gen­er­a­tion.

In a series of high-pro­file cases this year in Ari­zona, Cali­for­nia, Idaho, and Louisi­ana, state law­makers and reg­u­lat­ory com­mis­sion­ers sided with in­dustry and moved to either up­hold or strengthen net-meter­ing.

“The na­tion­al story right now is quite clear,” said Bry­an Miller, the pres­id­ent of the Al­li­ance for Sol­ar Choice, a sol­ar-ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tion. “There have now been four ma­jor ver­dicts on net-meter­ing, and in every case pro­posed reg­u­lat­ory changes to the policy have been re­jec­ted.”

A second point of con­ten­tion has been wheth­er util­it­ies should charge sol­ar cus­tom­ers ex­tra. Util­it­ies say ad­di­tion­al fees are needed to de­fray the cost of grid up­keep. Op­pon­ents say power com­pan­ies simply want to stamp out com­pet­i­tion.

In Novem­ber, Geor­gia Power backed down from a pro­pos­al to tack on fees for rooftop sol­ar cus­tom­ers amid pres­sure from con­sumer ad­voc­ates and sol­ar boost­ers. And in Idaho, the state pub­lic util­it­ies com­mis­sion re­jec­ted a sim­il­ar pro­pos­al.

Ari­zona bucked the trend when the Ari­zona Cor­por­a­tion Com­mis­sion de­cided that Ari­zona Pub­lic Ser­vice, the state’s largest util­ity com­pany, could hike rates for sol­ar cus­tom­ers.

It sounds like a win for the util­ity. But sol­ar groups say it’s not.

“In Ari­zona, APS got a lot less [in terms of the fee] then what they were ask­ing for,” Miller com­men­ted. “They wanted the fees to be some­where in the range of 50 to 100 dol­lars so the fi­nal rul­ing shows the polit­ic­al bound­ar­ies of the is­sue. And at the same time the com­mis­sion up­held net-meter­ing.”

Util­it­ies pro­viders, un­sur­pris­ingly, have a some­what dif­fer­ent per­spect­ive. 

“The com­mis­sion’s de­cision re­cog­nizes there is a cost shift oc­cur­ring where sol­ar users aren’t pay­ing what they should for use of the grid,” said Dav­id Owens, the ex­ec­ut­ive vice pres­id­ent of the Edis­on Elec­tric In­sti­tute, a trade as­so­ci­ation for U.S. in­vestor-owned elec­tric com­pan­ies.

Sol­ar groups gained more ground than they lost this year. But de­clar­a­tions of vic­tory by either side fail to cap­ture the whole pic­ture. 

“There is an un­fair char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion of util­it­ies versus sol­ar,” Owens said. “I’m not afraid of rooftop sol­ar. We see op­por­tun­it­ies there and we’re in­vest­ing in util­ity scale and oth­er sol­ar pro­jects. We’re not anti-sol­ar at all.”

What is clear is that head­ing in­to next year the ques­tion of sol­ar power pay­ment has not been re­solved.

State-level de­cisions im­pact­ing net-meter­ing and fees for sol­ar cus­tom­ers are be­gin­ing to look like just the start of a much lar­ger con­ver­sa­tion around re­work­ing util­ity pay­ment struc­tures in the age of dis­trib­uted gen­er­a­tion, an era whose hall­mark will be cus­tom­ers that cre­ate their own elec­tri­city without need­ing to rely on a cent­ral­ized power gen­er­at­or.

Both sides know the con­ver­sa­tion is com­ing, if it hasn’t already ar­rived.

“What we need to be talk­ing about is what’s the best way to al­loc­ate costs and how can we do this equit­ably and con­tin­ue to en­hance the grid,” Owens said. “What we’ve seen this year is a re­cog­ni­tion in vari­ous states that cur­rent rate-design struc­tures are not work­ing and they need to be re­vis­ited.”

For once, rooftop sol­ar ad­voc­ates don’t dis­agree. 

“I think we’re see­ing is that reg­u­lat­ors real­ize that you have to ad­dress these is­sues in the con­text of rate design,” Miller said. “The main thing is that when we look at rate design as a whole, sol­ar shouldn’t be made a tar­get.”

What We're Following See More »
JOINS BUSHES, MCCAIN
Romney to Skip Convention
15 minutes ago
THE LATEST

An aide to Mitt Romney confirmed to the Washington Post that the 2102 GOP nominee will not attend the Republican convention this year. He joins the two living Republican presidents, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as 2008 nominee John McCain in skipping the event. Even among living Republican nominees, that leaves only Bob Dole who could conceivably show up. Dole did say in January that he'd prefer Trump to Ted Cruz, but his age (92) could keep him from attending.

Source:
CALIFORNIA MAKES IT 21
FDA to Ban All Tobacco Sales to Minors
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a long-awaiting new rule, the Food and Drug Administration will ban sale of all tobacco products—including e-cigarettes—to those under 18. The rule takes effect in 90 days. It's part of a larger package of regulations that "gives FDA authority to regulate—but not to ban—all tobacco products, from e-cigarettes to cigars and hookahs." Meanwhile, California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a bill on Wednesday that would bump the legal age to buy all tobacco products from 18 to 21.

Source:
#NEVERTRUMP
Sen. Sasse Calls for a Third Candidate
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Sen. Ben Sasse, the most prominent elected official to declare that he's #NeverTrump, wrote an open letter on Facebook to the "majority of Americans who wonder why the nation that put a man on the moon can’t find a healthy leader who can take us forward together." Calling to mind recent conversations at a Fremont, Neb., Walmart, the senator pitted the presumptive general election battle between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as such a "terrible choice" that there would be an appetite for another candidate to emerge. In a parenthetical aside to reporters, Sasse ruled himself out. "Such a leader should be able to campaign 24/7 for the next six months," he wrote. "Therefore he/she likely can’t be an engaged parent with little kids." Meanwhile, his colleague Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) admitted in a private recording obtained by Politico that Trump hurts his reelection chances.

Source:
UTAH REPUBLICAN
Former Sen. Bob Bennett Dies at 82
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Former Utah Republican Sen. Bob Bennett died of pancreatic cancer on Wednesday after a long battle with pancreatic cancer. Bennett was defeated in a primary in 2010 by Tea Party–backed Mike Lee.

Source:
CLINTON HERSELF COULD TESTIFY LATER
Judge Approves Deposition of Clinton Aides
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, approved a joint proposal presented by Judicial Watch and the State Department to take the depositions of officials" involved in the setup and use of Hillary Clinton's private email server, "including Cheryl D. Mills, Clinton's former chief of staff, Huma Abedin, a senior adviser to Clinton, and Bryan Pagliano, a State Department employee who serviced and maintained the server." He said Clinton could be deposed later on, though that may not be necessary.

Source:
×