Oil and Natural Gas Industry Takes Issue With Tax-Reform Proposal

Max Baucus (D-MT) speaks at a Senate Finance Committee meeting on March 20, 2007.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Dec. 13, 2013, 8:21 a.m.

The oil and nat­ur­al-gas in­dustry is tak­ing is­sue with a tax-re­form pro­pos­al put for­ward by Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee Chair­man Max Baucus, D-Mont.

The pro­pos­al, which Baucus re­leased as a dis­cus­sion draft last month, would ex­tend the cost re­cov­ery peri­od for tax-de­duct­ible op­er­at­ing and labor costs in­curred by the in­dustry, in­clud­ing drilling ex­penses. It would also put an end to com­monly used ac­count­ing prac­tices such as the last-in, first-out meth­od of ac­count­ing, which serves to de­term­ine a com­pany’s tax li­ab­il­ity.

In a let­ter to Baucus on Fri­day, in­dustry stake­hold­ers say these changes could spell dis­aster for them. Spe­cific­ally, the let­ter states that if the changes go through, they could slow in­dustry growth and dis­cour­age private in­vest­ment in oil and nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion.

“Our in­dustry is posed to make even great­er cap­it­al in­vest­ments in do­mest­ic en­ergy pro­jects all across the United States, gen­er­at­ing jobs and rev­en­ues for loc­al com­munit­ies throughout the coun­try,” the let­ter states. “We must have a tax code that not only en­cour­ages growth in such in­vest­ments, but al­lows us to con­tin­ue our track re­cord of cre­at­ing jobs, grow­ing the eco­nomy, and strength­en­ing our en­ergy se­cur­ity.”

Sig­nat­or­ies in­clude Jack Ger­ard, pres­id­ent and CEO of the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute, the largest trade as­so­ci­ation for the oil and gas in­dustry, and Mar­tin Durbin, pres­id­ent and CEO of Amer­ica’s Nat­ur­al Gas Al­li­ance, a ma­jor trade group rep­res­ent­ing in­de­pend­ent nat­ur­al-gas ex­plor­a­tion and pro­duc­tion com­pan­ies.

Read the full let­ter here.

What We're Following See More »
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
1 hours ago

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
1 hours ago

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
4 hours ago

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
5 hours ago

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."

SCOTUS Will Not Allow ‘DC Madam’ Phone Records to Be Released
5 hours ago

Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."