This story is a corrected version. An earlier version incorrectly stated the state of Alaska would allow drilling in the most environmentally sensitive areas.
The Alaska governor’s office, which has long griped that the Obama administration has blocked oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, is aggressively pushing a plan to drill off a pristine strip of state-owned coast threading between the federally protected lands and waters.
Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell, a Republican, announced the plan on Thursday by teleconference at a Washington press conference held in conjunction with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. It would allow the state to start allowing drilling in the Beaufort Sea, up to three miles off the federally protected regions of ANWR and the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, bypassing the need for federal permission. It also appears calculated to ramp up political pressure on the administration to allow new drilling on the contested federal lands and waters.
Parnell said he intends to use this move to encourage other coastal states to expand drilling.
“We’re setting an example for what other states can do. Much of Alaska’s promising lands are under federal control. We need America’s help to spur production.”
“This is breaking new ground,” said a senior official at a major U.S. oil company, who asked not to be identified since all major oil companies were not made aware of the decision before it was announced. “In the past, nothing anywhere near ANWR was even talked about. This would present an opportunity that’s never been available before. The industry will welcome this as a positive development.”
It’s long been a source of ire to the oil industry””and relief to environmentalists””that the federal government has final say on whether companies can drill in the federal waters of the Arctic Ocean, the 19 million acres of ANWR, and the 24 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve, which are believed to hold more than 10 billion barrels of undiscovered oil. But those areas are also home to sensitive and unique ecosystems that could be devastated by a disaster like last summer’s Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Since the federal government created ANWR in 1960 and the NPR in 1923, it has fought attempts to open up the wildlife refuge and resisted efforts to issue permits to drill in the reserve. The administration has issued permits to Shell Oil to begin drilling the first exploratory wells in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, but it delayed those plans after the Gulf spill, citing the need for more research into impacts of an Arctic spill.
All of this has aggravated officials in Alaska, which derives most of its revenue from oil royalties.
“The first couple of years of the Obama administration have felt like an onslaught,” Alaska Department of Resources Commissioner Daniel Sullivan told National Journal in an interview.
From National Journal:
Colbert Leaves FEC Triumphant
Senate Staycation: Here, But Not Clear What to Do
VIDEO: Gates Legacy Still Hangs in the Balance
On The Trail: Changing Face of the GOP
PICTURES: Obama Shows Off His Team Spirit
So state officials say they found a way to take action. While the state has no control over drilling in ANWR, it does own the three miles of Arctic Ocean just off the coast””after those three miles, the federal government owns the waters. Officials say it stands to reason that that three-mile ribbon likely cuts through the vast oil deposits believed to lie beneath ANWR and the Arctic Ocean. Alaskan officials and oil companies hope that by drilling in that strip, they can tap into up to a dozen giant oil pools that would otherwise be off-limits. And if they do hit significant reserves there, that could pressure the federal government to open adjacent areas. Another option Alaskan officials are hoping for is passage of a bill sponsored by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, the ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which would allow drillers in state-owned waters to use horizontal drills to siphon oil from underneath the adjacent protected areas.
Sullivan said he expects Alaska’s October sale of onshore and offshore drilling leases to be the largest such sale this year. Overall, it will open up 14.7 million acres to drilling, an area equal to Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont combined.
He added that he is confident that companies that find oil in the state waters between the federal properties will be able to withstand any legal challenges.
“We’ve looked hard at the legal issues surrounding such plays, and we are confident that if a company drilled down straight down within that play, and drained that reserve, they will be within their legal rights. Large oil and gas fields don’t respect state and federal boundaries. But if a company drilling on state land hit that well they would be within their legal right to drain that well.”
The pushback from the environmental community should be fierce. Over a year after the deadly Gulf oil spill highlighted the dangers of offshore drilling, Congress has yet to pass legislation requiring new offshore-drilling safety measures, and environmental advocates, led by the Pew Environment Group, have pressed President Obama not to allow any new drilling in Arctic waters, where, green groups say, extreme weather conditions and a sensitive ecosystem could make the impacts of a spill even more devastating.
Eleanor Huffines, manager of Pew’s U.S. Arctic Program, said that the group does not have a problem with the current drilling in Alaska’s state-owned waters, which takes place near the on-land Prudhoe Bay drilling operations.
“To date the state-water offshore-drilling facilities have been done in a way that minimizes harm to the environment,” she said. “But for each plan, location is important. To date it’s been done safely, but that’s not to say you could do that off ANWR. You have to connect to the coast, which means building infrastructure. How could you do that in ANWR? The risks to sensitive species would be higher. It would be much more difficult to do safely.”
Sullivan said that the state will not allow drilling in the most environmentally sensitive areas, where whale migration and whale calving areas are.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."