Western Powers May Offer Iran Quick Sanctions Curbs

July 18, 2014, 6:55 a.m.

West­ern ne­go­ti­at­ors may float fast curbs on key Ir­an sanc­tions in a bid for ad­di­tion­al re­stric­tions on Tehran’s dis­puted atom­ic ef­forts, Re­u­ters re­ports.

Na­tions in talks with Ir­an are weigh­ing wheth­er to sug­gest lift­ing meas­ures tar­get­ing a range of Ir­a­ni­an busi­ness sec­tors, en­voys told the news ser­vice for a Thursday art­icle. The moves would take place in ex­change for ad­di­tion­al lim­it­a­tions on Ir­an’s atom­ic activ­it­ies, which are os­tens­ibly peace­ful but could help the na­tion build nuc­le­ar arms.

“When Ir­an does something, then we can re­spond with sanc­tions re­lief,” one of the en­voys said. “The whole pro­cess will take years.”

The news came as U.S. Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry re­portedly sug­ges­ted he was will­ing to con­sider ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions aimed at clos­ing gaps now di­vid­ing Tehran from six oth­er ne­go­ti­at­ing coun­tries. The sides were re­portedly dis­cuss­ing terms for con­tinu­ing nuc­le­ar ne­go­ti­ations bey­ond Sunday, when an in­ter­im atom­ic ac­cord is sched­uled to ex­pire.

The pro­posed of­fer re­portedly would lift eco­nom­ic pen­al­ties that na­tions could quickly re-im­pose over any Ir­a­ni­an vi­ol­a­tions of a longer-term nuc­le­ar com­prom­ise. Ac­cord­ing to one ex­pert, in­ter­na­tion­al firms would want clear guidelines for im­ple­ment­ing such terms and avoid­ing U.S. pen­al­ties.

“Over­com­ing the reti­cence of in­ter­na­tion­al banks to do busi­ness with Ir­an will re­quire the [six powers] to is­sue clear reg­u­lat­ory guid­ance about which mul­ti­lat­er­al sanc­tions are lif­ted,” says a writ­ten ana­lys­is by Eliza­beth Rosen­berg, a spe­cial­ist with the Cen­ter for a New Amer­ic­an Se­cur­ity.

Mark Dubowitz, head of the Found­a­tion for De­fense of Demo­cra­cies, said any ef­fort to “front-load re­lief too sig­ni­fic­antly” would prompt a “back­lash” from U.S. law­makers.

Cer­tain U.S. busi­ness groups, though, ap­peared ready to res­ist any new con­gres­sion­al ef­fort to hit Ir­an with new eco­nom­ic pen­al­ties, For­eign Policy re­por­ted on Thursday.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×