Western negotiators may float fast curbs on key Iran sanctions in a bid for additional restrictions on Tehran’s disputed atomic efforts, Reuters reports.
Nations in talks with Iran are weighing whether to suggest lifting measures targeting a range of Iranian business sectors, envoys told the news service for a Thursday article. The moves would take place in exchange for additional limitations on Iran’s atomic activities, which are ostensibly peaceful but could help the nation build nuclear arms.
“When Iran does something, then we can respond with sanctions relief,” one of the envoys said. “The whole process will take years.”
The news came as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry reportedly suggested he was willing to consider additional sanctions aimed at closing gaps now dividing Tehran from six other negotiating countries. The sides were reportedly discussing terms for continuing nuclear negotiations beyond Sunday, when an interim atomic accord is scheduled to expire.
The proposed offer reportedly would lift economic penalties that nations could quickly re-impose over any Iranian violations of a longer-term nuclear compromise. According to one expert, international firms would want clear guidelines for implementing such terms and avoiding U.S. penalties.
“Overcoming the reticence of international banks to do business with Iran will require the [six powers] to issue clear regulatory guidance about which multilateral sanctions are lifted,” says a written analysis by Elizabeth Rosenberg, a specialist with the Center for a New American Security.
Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said any effort to “front-load relief too significantly” would prompt a “backlash” from U.S. lawmakers.
Certain U.S. business groups, though, appeared ready to resist any new congressional effort to hit Iran with new economic penalties, Foreign Policy reported on Thursday.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.