Space Shuttle’s Demise Hits U.K. Trident Fleet

July 16, 2014, 10:25 a.m.

The end of U.S. Space Shuttle launches three years ago has boos­ted the cost of fuel for Brit­ish nuc­le­ar mis­siles, the Lon­don Tele­graph re­ports.

The price of the sol­id fuel used in Tri­dent 2 D-5 sub­mar­ine-launched bal­list­ic mis­siles leaped by 80 per­cent in just one year, the news­pa­per said in a Tues­day re­port. The United King­dom main­tains 58 of the U.S.-sup­plied weapons un­der a 1982 bi­lat­er­al de­fense pact.

Wash­ing­ton is now lim­it­ing its an­nu­al pur­chases of the weapons to the min­im­um ne­ces­sary to keep the fuel mar­ket afloat, prompt­ing con­cern among some of­fi­cials, ac­cord­ing to the Tele­graph.

Vice Adm. Terry Be­ne­dict, dir­ect­or of the U.S. Navy’s Stra­tegic Sys­tems Pro­grams, warned last month that the ab­sence of fuel de­mand from the Space Shuttle pro­gram is pos­ing prob­lems for an “already-fra­gile in­dustry.”

The United King­dom, though, said such con­cerns had not altered mis­sile co­oper­a­tion with Wash­ing­ton, or a pending plan to re­vamp the Brit­ish nuc­le­ar force.

“The U.S. has sup­plied the U.K. with sol­id fuel-powered mis­siles for over 40 years with an ex­cel­lent safety and re­li­ab­il­ity re­cord. The U.K. also has a suf­fi­cient pool of Tri­dent mis­siles to meet our needs for dec­ades to come,” a Brit­ish de­fense min­istry spokes­wo­man said.

One agency in­sider, though, said the United States has yet to de­term­ine how it will en­sure con­tin­ued sup­plies of mis­sile fuel.

The U.S. Navy wants NASA to pur­chase sol­id-fuel boost­ers for a next-gen­er­a­tion rock­et sys­tem, po­ten­tially sta­bil­iz­ing the mar­ket, the Tele­graph re­por­ted. The U.S. space agency is slated to start work on the planned Space Launch Sys­tem in 2017.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×