Quantifying Progress in Reducing WMD Threats Getting Tougher: Report

None

Missile-launch tubes removed from a ballistic missile submarine in January 2010 are eliminated with equipment and services provided by the U.S. Defense Department's Cooperative Threat Reduction program. A new congressional report warns it is growing more difficult to quantify progress in reducing the global threat posed by weapons of mass destruction.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
June 26, 2014, 6:54 a.m.

A re­cent con­gres­sion­al re­port sees grow­ing dif­fi­culty ahead in quan­ti­fy­ing pro­gress in U.S. ef­forts to se­cure and elim­in­ate weapons of mass de­struc­tion.

Chan­ging cir­cum­stances — in­clud­ing some not­able suc­cesses — are the cul­prit, ac­cord­ing to a June 13 re­port by the Con­gres­sion­al Re­search Ser­vice pos­ted on­line by the Fed­er­a­tion of Amer­ic­an Sci­ent­ists.

After more than 20 years, many U.S. pro­grams au­thor­ized by the Nunn-Lugar Act to dis­pose of So­viet-era nuc­le­ar and chem­ic­al arms are al­most done with their work. Thou­sands of nuc­le­ar war­heads and hun­dreds of long-range bal­list­ic mis­siles have been des­troyed as part of the Co­oper­at­ive Threat Re­duc­tion ini­ti­at­ive.

But as dis­arm­a­ment work in the former So­viet Uni­on winds down, the United States in­creas­ingly is fo­cused on the less quan­ti­fi­able goal of re­du­cing the po­ten­tial for non­state act­ors op­er­at­ing in the Middle East and Africa to ac­quire un­con­ven­tion­al arms.

“As the United States has ex­pan­ded its threat re­duc­tion as­sist­ance to na­tions out­side the former So­viet states, and as the pro­grams have em­phas­ized co­oper­at­ive en­gage­ment, ca­pa­city-build­ing, and best prac­tices in­stead of weapons dis­man­tle­ment and fa­cil­ity se­cur­ity, the prob­lem of meas­ur­ing pro­gress has grown more com­plic­ated,” con­cludes the CRS re­port.

Re­cent ex­amples of this new ca­pa­city-build­ing work in­clude a U.S.-fin­anced pro­ject to build a high-se­cur­ity bio­lo­gic­al labor­at­ory in Kaza­kh­stan, the de­ploy­ment of ra­di­ation scan­ners at Azerbaijan’s Baku Air­port, and the train­ing of Kenyan and Ugandan armed forces to re­spond to a WMD ter­ror­ist at­tack.

“While par­ti­cipants in the [CTR] pro­gram may be con­fid­ent in their abil­ity to share know­ledge and build co­oper­at­ive re­la­tion­ships, they may be less con­fid­ent in their abil­ity to meas­ure the re­la­tion­ship between fund­ing and pro­gress in co­oper­a­tion,” the re­port by Con­gress’ in­tern­al think tank notes.

“However, most of the threat re­duc­tion as­sist­ance cur­rently un­der way is more dif­fi­cult to quanti­fy,” the con­gres­sion­al ana­lysts ex­plained. “In many cases, pro­gress is evid­ent in ac­cess to de­cision makers and op­er­at­ors, and suc­cess is re­flec­ted in the growth of re­la­tion­ships.”

The re­port said that met­rics could po­ten­tially be de­veloped for threat-re­duc­tion ef­forts, based in part on sur­vey tools used in re­lated pro­jects that at­tempt to gauge pro­gress in such fields as “a coun­try’s li­cens­ing, en­force­ment, in­dustry out­reach, and non­pro­lif­er­a­tion re­gime ad­her­ence.”

Mean­while, U.S. Co­oper­at­ive Threat Re­duc­tion ini­ti­at­ives have played high-pro­file roles in re­cent in­ter­na­tion­al non­pro­lif­er­a­tion wins. CTR fund­ing was used to re­pair a chem­ic­als de­struc­tion fa­cil­ity in Libya that was dis­abled by the 2011 re­volu­tion, pav­ing the way for the North Afric­an coun­try last year to fi­nally des­troy the last of its chem­ic­al arms. Sim­il­arly, the U.S. MV Cape Ray, which is set to shortly be­gin des­troy­ing Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al war­fare ma­ter­i­als, was also equipped us­ing CTR funds.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
17 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×