White House Opposes House Missile-Defense Moves

A Patriot Advanced Capability 3 interceptor is launched from Omelek Island during a test in October 2012. The White House this week rejected several missile-defense initiatives proposed by the Republican-controlled House.
National Journal
Sebastian Sprenger
May 21, 2014, 10:03 a.m.

Sev­er­al de­fens­ive and of­fens­ive mis­sile-themed pro­vi­sions that ori­gin­ated in the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled House have drawn op­pos­i­tion from the White House.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion de­cried as too risky and too ex­pens­ive a push by law­makers to ac­cel­er­ate the de­ploy­ment to Po­land of a land-based ver­sion of the Ae­gis mis­sile de­fense sys­tem by some­time in 2016, and short-range an­ti­mis­sile cap­ab­il­it­ies by late 2014.

House mis­sile-de­fense ad­voc­ates had in­ser­ted lan­guage to that ef­fect in­to the fisc­al 2015 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill. The le­gis­la­tion is ex­pec­ted to be con­sidered on the House floor this week.

Meant by its sup­port­ers as a coun­ter­weight to Mo­scow’s re­cent moves, the speedi­er field­ing of de­fens­ive sys­tems would “not change Rus­sia’s se­cur­ity cal­cu­la­tion in Europe,” the White House ar­gued in a Monday state­ment of ad­min­is­tra­tion policy.

U.S. of­fi­cials also fear that short-range an­ti­mis­sile weaponry de­ployed to Po­land would “lim­it the abil­ity of the United States to meet its world­wide op­er­a­tion­al mis­sile de­fense re­quire­ments.”

The White House also op­posed bill lan­guage that would force the Pentagon to keep ex­ist­ing in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­sile silos avail­able for pos­sible use. The pro­vi­sion in ques­tion was spear­headed by law­makers from states host­ing these fa­cil­it­ies.

“While it is the pres­id­ent’s de­term­in­a­tion that 50 of the cur­rent 450 Minute­man 3 silos will re­main in a non-de­ployed — warm — status, this pro­vi­sion would tie the hands of all pres­id­ents with re­spect to force struc­ture through [Feb­ru­ary] 2021,” the state­ment of ad­min­is­tra­tion policy reads.

Of­fi­cials lamen­ted as “pre­ma­ture and po­ten­tially waste­ful” lan­guage to set aside $20 mil­lion for the plan­ning and design of an East Coast mis­sile field of long-range in­ter­cept­ors. Law­makers had in­ser­ted to pro­vi­sion with an eye to­ward boost­ing the de­fens­ive cap­ab­il­ity against a po­ten­tial at­tack from North Korea and else­where.

The Pentagon did not re­quest money for an East Coast site in its fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al. De­fense of­fi­cials have said they re­main un­sure if such a site is ne­ces­sary.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×