Canadian Govt. Seen Probing Public Interest in Joining U.S. Missile Shield

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
May 13, 2014, 6:45 a.m.

Canada’s Con­ser­vat­ive Party-led gov­ern­ment seems to be prob­ing the pub­lic in­terest in join­ing a U.S. an­ti­mis­sile ini­ti­at­ive, the Globe and Mail re­ports.

Con­ser­vat­ive-con­trolled pan­els in the Ca­na­dian Sen­ate and House of Com­mons are in­ter­view­ing ex­perts about the costs and be­ne­fits of col­lab­or­at­ing with the United States on a mis­sile de­fense frame­work to pro­tect North Amer­ica, ac­cord­ing to the Tues­day art­icle. In 2005, then-Ca­na­dian Prime Min­is­ter Paul Mar­tin of the Lib­er­al Party op­ted to turn down a U.S. re­quest to par­ti­cip­ate in re­gion­al mis­sile de­fense.

A change in polit­ic­al lead­er­ship as well as per­cep­tions of a grow­ing threat posed by North Korea’s long-range mis­sile de­vel­op­ment have promp­ted Ot­t­awa to re­as­sess its stance on the is­sue, ac­cord­ing to Colin Robertson, vice-pres­id­ent of the Ca­na­dian De­fense and For­eign Af­fairs In­sti­tute.

“I think the gov­ern­ment is test­ing the wa­ters to see wheth­er the con­di­tions are right,” said Robertson, who fa­vors join­ing the U.S. mis­sile shield.

Philip Coyle, a one­time head of the Pentagon’s weapons test­ing and eval­u­ation of­fice, in Monday testi­mony to the Sen­ate cri­ti­cized U.S. mis­sile de­fense ef­forts as in­ef­fect­ive. “The hard­ware be­ing de­ployed in Alaska and Cali­for­nia has no demon­strated cap­ab­il­ity to de­fend the United States, let alone Canada, against en­emy mis­sile at­tack un­der real­ist­ic op­er­a­tion­al con­di­tions,” Coyle said.

He was re­fer­ring to the 30 in­ter­cept­ors cur­rently fielded on the West Coast as part of the Ground-based Mid­course De­fense sys­tem — the coun­try’s prin­cip­al de­fense against a lim­ited stra­tegic bal­list­ic mis­sile strike.

Con­fer­ence of De­fense As­so­ci­ations In­sti­tute ana­lyst Dav­id Perry said he be­lieves the Ca­na­dian gov­ern­ment is “float­ing a tri­al bal­loon” with the par­lia­ment hear­ings.

De­fense Min­is­ter Rob Nich­olson’s of­fice would not an­swer a ques­tion on wheth­er the gov­ern­ment is con­sid­er­ing chan­ging its mind about mis­sile de­fense co­oper­a­tion with Wash­ing­ton.

“No de­cision has been made to change this policy,” said his spokes­wo­man, Jo­hanna Quin­ney. “We will con­tin­ue to mon­it­or in­ter­na­tion­al de­vel­op­ments.”

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×