NATO Team Counsels Ukraine on Atomic Reactor Safety

Global Security Newswire Staff
May 8, 2014, 8:30 a.m.

NATO spe­cial­ists re­cently ad­vised Ukraine on the safety of its atom­ic re­act­ors, amid con­cerns about spread­ing in­stabil­ity in the coun­try, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

A team of al­li­ance ci­vil­ian ex­perts traveled to the coun­try in April at Kiev’s re­quest to provide re­com­mend­a­tions on op­tions for en­han­cing pro­tec­tions around key in­fra­struc­ture sites such as nuc­le­ar plants and gas pipelines, the news ser­vice re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day.

Some in­de­pend­ent ana­lysts have voiced con­cern about the po­ten­tial for a nuc­le­ar plant melt­down oc­cur­ring if the elec­tri­city that powers re­act­ors’ cool­ing sys­tems is cut off or plant per­son­nel flee their posts due to nearby fight­ing in the coun­try.

“In any coun­try, in any situ­ation, there are plans and ad­di­tion­al meas­ures to pro­tect in­fra­struc­ture ob­jects,” Ukrain­i­an Am­bas­sad­or to NATO Ihor Dol­hov said in an in­ter­view. “So the pur­pose was to eval­u­ate the per­form­ance of meas­ures which are be­ing im­ple­men­ted in Ukraine to pro­tect such ob­jects.”

Fears of “pos­sible destabil­iz­a­tion” in areas where key en­ergy sites are loc­ated promp­ted Kiev to seek the ex­pert ad­vice, the dip­lo­mat ac­know­ledged.

There are 15 act­ive atom­ic en­ergy plants in Ukraine, ac­cord­ing to the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency.

In ad­di­tion to host­ing nu­mer­ous nuc­le­ar sites, Ukraine also is home to a num­ber of de­fense factor­ies that sup­ply stra­tegic mis­sile com­pon­ents to Rus­sia, Bloomberg Busi­nes­s­week re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day.

Over half of Rus­sia’s nuc­le­ar base was con­struc­ted in Ukraine or re­lies on nav­ig­a­tion tech­no­logy pro­duced by Ukraine, said Ser­hiy Zgurets, a Ukraine de­fense in­dustry ex­pert.

Were arms ship­ments and con­tracts to ser­vice Rus­si­an long-range mis­siles hal­ted, there would be very real im­pacts for some Rus­si­an weapon sys­tems, sug­ges­ted Siemon Weze­man, a seni­or re­search­er for the Stock­holm In­ter­na­tion­al Peace Re­search In­sti­tute.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×