A military offensive by Syrian rebels near a site holding chemical arms is halting progress to remove all such weapons from the country, Reuters reports.
The fighting took place near an air base east of Damascus, as rebels sought to confront regime forces focused on the capital. A second air base, 25 miles from the site of the reported fighting, is believed to contain precursor chemicals usable in weapons. The materials are to be shipped to the port city of Latakia for removal from the country under an agreement struck last year.
“It’s a very contested area right now,” Reuters quoted an unnamed diplomat as saying in a May 2 report. The diplomat said it was not yet clear if an alternative route circumventing rebel-held territory could be found.
The materials at Sayqal air base are thought to be the last cache of arms waiting to be disposed. The regime so far has removed 1,300 metric tons of chemical weaponry following the threat of military intervention in the wake of a sarin gas attack that killed hundreds last August.
The latest rebel offensive appeared to be funded by Gulf Arab supporters, Reuters reported, quoting unnamed activists.
Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Saturday spoke with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, stressing the need to stick with an internationally agreed-upon timeline for removing all chemical weapons from Syria, Reuters reported separately.
“I pressed that we must see the last removal of the 8 percent remaining at a site near Damascus,” the news service quoted Kerry as telling reporters. “We agreed that we would work on certain things to try to see if it is possible to accelerate that process with an understanding that the government of Syria cannot delay.”
The Syrian government has missed several deadlines for removing its arsenal of declared chemical arms.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.