House Bill Mandate on Nuclear Missile Silos Draws Opposition

Global Security Newswire Staff
Global Security Newswire Staff
May 1, 2014, 10:18 a.m.

A House bill’s man­date that all nuc­le­ar mis­sile silos be kept op­er­a­tion­al in­def­in­itely has drawn op­pos­i­tion from some Demo­crats, Politico Pro re­ports.

The Re­pub­lic­an-led House Armed Ser­vices Sub­com­mit­tee on Stra­tegic Forces in its Wed­nes­day mark-up and ap­prov­al of an­nu­al de­fense policy le­gis­la­tion in­cluded a re­quire­ment that the De­fense De­part­ment main­tain each of the silos cur­rently hous­ing a Minute­man 3 mis­sile at least in “warm” status re­gard­less of wheth­er the weapon at a later date is re­moved from the un­der­ground launch cham­ber.

In ac­cord­ance with the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the New START pact with Rus­sia, the Pentagon last month an­nounced that between now and 2018 it would with­draw and place in re­serve 54 of the in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­siles but would keep their silos ready for po­ten­tial fu­ture us­age. The House bill pro­vi­sion ap­pears to go fur­ther than the Pentagon’s stated plan, though, by re­quir­ing that all of the ap­prox­im­ately 450 silos be kept op­er­a­tion­al in­def­in­itely.

“A con­gres­sion­al pro­vi­sion to in­def­in­itely pre­vent the re­duc­tion of mis­sile silos un­der­mines our mil­it­ary’s abil­ity to de­term­ine op­tim­al force struc­ture and ad­apt to our se­cur­ity needs,” U.S. Rep­res­ent­at­ive Lor­etta Sanc­hez (D-Cal­if.) was quoted by Politico Pro as say­ing. “It is only sens­ible that as we re­duce the num­ber of our nuc­le­ar weapons, we main­tain the abil­ity to ap­pro­pri­ately size our nuc­le­ar force struc­ture.”

Mi­chael Am­ato, a spokes­man for U.S. Rep­res­ent­at­ive Adam Smith (D-Wash.), said his boss thinks the mis­sile silo re­quire­ment would place “an un­ne­ces­sary and sig­ni­fic­ant fin­an­cial and stra­tegic bur­den” on the U.S. mil­it­ary.

Smith is the seni­or Demo­crat on the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, and Sanc­hez sits on the pan­el’s Stra­tegic Forces Sub­com­mit­tee

Law­makers from the three states that host the Minute­man 3 ar­sen­al — Montana, North Dakota and Wyom­ing — have moved re­peatedly to block any ef­fort to re­duce the Minute­man 3 ar­sen­al.

What We're Following See More »
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.