Plutonium-Facility Construction to Proceed This Year, Despite Mothball Plans

Global Security Newswire Staff
April 30, 2014, 10:43 a.m.

The En­ergy De­part­ment on Tues­day said con­struc­tion of a mixed-ox­ide plant will con­tin­ue for now, though the in­ten­tion is to even­tu­ally ax the pro­ject.

“We will con­tin­ue with con­struc­tion activ­it­ies through [fisc­al] 2014, re­tain­ing the key nuc­le­ar en­gin­eers and oth­er highly skilled work­ers that will be needed re­gard­less of the path for­ward,” Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion spokes­man Josh Mc­Co­naha said in a state­ment to the As­so­ci­ated Press.

The En­ergy De­part­ment in its fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al said it planned to shut down work on the par­tially con­struc­ted MOX fuel fab­ric­a­tion fa­cil­ity in South Car­o­lina due to the pro­ject’s high cost. That an­nounce­ment was met by an out­cry from the state of South Car­o­lina, which is su­ing to keep the pro­ject go­ing.

The de­part­ment on Tues­day said it would not con­tin­ue con­struc­tion of the fuel fab­ric­a­tion fa­cil­ity past Sept. 30 — the end of the cur­rent fisc­al year — un­less it re­ceives a pledge from Con­gress that fur­ther fund­ing for build­ing work would be ap­proved to the tune of $500 mil­lion to $600 mil­lion an­nu­ally un­til 2027, the New York Times re­por­ted.

The fa­cil­ity was in­ten­ded to dis­pose of a large amount of sur­plus weapons-grade plutoni­um that the United States agreed to elim­in­ate un­der a bind­ing non­pro­lif­er­a­tion ac­cord with Rus­sia.

The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion on Tues­day re­leased a study in­to al­tern­at­ives for dis­pos­ing of the ex­cess plutoni­um. The re­port fo­cused on four al­tern­at­ive op­tions: ir­ra­di­at­ing the plutoni­um in a fast re­act­or that would need to be built; im­mob­il­iz­a­tion; down-blend­ing and stor­age at an ex­ist­ing un­der­ground nuc­le­ar-waste dump in New Mex­ico; and deep bore­hole dis­pos­al. The lat­ter three op­tions would all re­quire a sup­ple­ment­al agree­ment to be worked out with Rus­sia.

Down-blend­ing the plutoni­um with in­ert ma­ter­i­als and stor­ing it at the Waste Isol­a­tion Pi­lot Plant offered the smal­lest pro­jec­ted price tag at $8.8 bil­lion.

Ed­win Ly­man, a seni­or sci­ent­ist with the Uni­on of Con­cerned Sci­ent­ists, in a Tues­day ana­lys­is said the down-blend­ing op­tion was the best al­tern­at­ive, due to its com­par­at­ively low cost and tech­nic­al risk.

The WIPP fa­cil­ity, however, is not presently ac­cept­ing new ship­ments of ra­dio­act­ive waste, due to an ac­ci­dent earli­er this year that caused the re­lease of some ra­dio­act­ive ele­ments.

What We're Following See More »
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.