Afghanistan Needs More Than U.S. Troops to Survive

While the U.S. waits for Afghanistan to sign a post-2014 troop deal, a new report shows the war-torn nation is going to need a lot more than that.

US Army soldiers attached to the 2nd platoon, C-Coy. 1-23 Infantry walk in line behind a designated mine-detecting device operator at Naja-bien village, notorious for IED caused injuries and deaths, in Panjwai district during a morning operation to find and destroy bomb traps made from IED's on September 23, 2012.
National Journal
Stephanie Gaskell, Defense One
April 30, 2014, 7:21 a.m.

While the United States waits pa­tiently for the new Afghan pres­id­ent to sign a post-2014 troop deal, a new re­port shows that the war-torn na­tion is go­ing to need much more than a few thou­sand U.S. and NATO forces to stand on its own.

The U.S. Spe­cial In­spect­or for Afghan Re­con­struc­tion, or­S­IGAR, just re­leased his quarterly re­port and while there was “a rare mo­ment of op­tim­ism” when elec­tions were suc­cess­fully held earli­er this month, there is still much that could re­verse the gains Afgh­anistan has made over the past 13 years.

Cor­rup­tion tops that list, of course. Afgh­anistan is tied for last place with Somalia and North Korea among 177 coun­tries rated for cor­rup­tion by Trans­par­ency In­ter­na­tion­al. In 2012 alone, it’s es­tim­ated that half of Afghans paid nearly $4 bil­lion in bribes. And des­pite pour­ing nearly $200 mil­lion in­to help­ing Afgh­anistan col­lect cus­toms fees, a key stream of rev­en­ue, “U.S.ad­visors re­port that Afghan em­ploy­ees who try to prop­erly col­lect cus­toms du­ties have been kid­napped and in­tim­id­ated,” Spe­cial In­spect­or John Sop­ko wrote in the re­port.

Be­cause cor­rup­tion re­mains so per­vas­ive, draw­ing down the ap­prox­im­ately 33,000 U.S. troops in Afgh­anistan to zero or, com­bined with NATO, main­tain­ing a force of up to 12,000 for­eign fight­ers isn’t go­ing to make re­build­ing any easi­er. Part of the prob­lem, Sop­ko said, is that it’s un­clear what the ex­act defin­i­tion of cor­rup­tion is. Joint Staff of­fi­cials have used a defin­i­tion of cor­rup­tion as “ab­use of pub­lic of­fice and private gain,” but that doesn’t al­ways trans­late in Afgh­anistan “where gifts to of­fi­cials and fa­vors for eth­nic or tri­bal pat­ron­age net­works are nor­mal,” the re­port said. “ISAF even­tu­ally defined cor­rup­tion as ‘the mis­use of power for per­son­al gain,’ but found ap­ply­ing even that loose stand­ard chal­len­ging.”

An­oth­er ma­jor chal­lenge in Afgh­anistan is its abund­ant poppy fields that pro­duce opi­um and help fund the Taliban. The U.S.has tried nu­mer­ous ways to com­bat opi­um, but after spend­ing $7 bil­lion and a set­ting a goal to re­duce the cul­tiv­a­tion of poppy by half by 2016, it’s ac­tu­ally grown by nearly 40 per­cent, the re­port said. Afghan forces have tried to con­tin­ue erad­ic­a­tion ef­forts, but with erod­ing sup­port from U.S. and NATO, it’s un­clear how much of a pri­or­ity that will be.

Since 2002, Con­gress has ap­pro­pri­ated more than $103 bil­lion to help re­build Afgh­anistan. Now those con­struc­tion pro­jects are at risk simply be­cause, with or without in­ter­na­tion­al forces after this year, in­spect­ors can’t reach many of the sites due to a lack of se­cur­ity. SIGAR says Afgh­anistan’s “over­sight bubbles” — the abil­ity of U.S. forces to pro­tect re­con­struc­tion in­spect­ors — are, like the U.S. mil­it­ary foot­print, get­ting smal­ler and smal­ler. With Afgh­anistan es­tim­ated to be able to fund as little as one third of its $7.5 bil­lion budget this year, Sop­ko has ‘ser­i­ous con­cerns” that the bil­lions of dol­lars that have flooded the coun­try will go to waste.

What We're Following See More »
ON GUN RIGHTS
Trump Jr. Meeting with GOP Members
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
FLOPPY DISKS
US Nukes Rely on Decades-Old Tech
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS
‘NO BASIS IN LAW’
Eleven States Sue Administration Over Transgender Bathroom Access
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

The great restroom war of 2016 continues apace, as eleven states have sued the Obama administration in federal court, claiming its federal guidance on how schools should accommodate transgender students "has no basis in law." "The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has worked to turn workplaces and schools 'into laboratories for a massive social experiment.'"

Source:
NEXT STOP: THE FLOOR
Puerto Rico Debt Bill Passes House Committee
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

By a 29-10 vote, the House Natural Resources Committee today passed the bill to allow Puerto Rico to restructure its $70 billion in debt. The legislation "would establish an oversight board to help the commonwealth restructure its un-payable debt and craft an economic recovery plan."

Source:
WITHIN 15 DAYS OF NOMINATION
Wyden Bill Would Make Nominees’ Tax Disclosures Mandatory
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Though every major party nominee since 1976 has released his tax returns while running for president, the practice has never been required by law. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to change that. The senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, which handles tax issues, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would force presidential candidates to release their most recent tax returns. The Presidential Tax Transparency Act, as the bill is called, would require candidates to make their latest three years of tax returns public no later than 15 days after becoming the nominee."

Source:
×