U.S. Drops Work on Next-Gen Bioweapon Sensors

Global Security Newswire Staff
April 29, 2014, 9:29 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion killed a mult­i­bil­lion-dol­lar pro­pos­al to de­ploy new, self-op­er­at­ing bioweapon sensors in U.S. cit­ies, the Los Angeles Times re­ports.

Home­land Se­cur­ity Sec­ret­ary Jeh John­son last week fi­nal­ized plans to forgo the pro­cure­ment of a third gen­er­a­tion of Biowatch tech­no­logy, re­vers­ing his de­part­ment’s long­time push to de­ploy sensors that per­son­nel would not need to check reg­u­larly for or­gan­isms from an un­fold­ing bio­lo­gic­al at­tack.

The policy shift sig­nals a ded­ic­a­tion to “cost-ef­fect­ive ac­quis­i­tion without com­prom­ising our se­cur­ity,” Home­land Se­cur­ity spokes­man S.Y. Lee said.

The pro­posed up­date was ex­pec­ted to carry a $3.1 bil­lion price tag for its first five years of use, where­as the ex­ist­ing Biowatch pro­gram has cost $1.1 bil­lion since 2003.

Pri­or re­port­ing re­vealed a his­tory of in­ac­cur­ate read­ings from the ex­ist­ing sensors, as well as prob­lems con­cern­ing the de­pend­ab­il­ity of the de­vel­op­ment­al de­tec­tion gear.

Home­land Se­cur­ity “re­mains com­mit­ted to the Biowatch pro­gram and the im­port­ance of im­prov­ing our early warn­ing and de­tec­tion tech­no­lo­gies,” said Mi­chael Wal­ter, who over­sees the de­tec­tion sys­tem now de­ployed in more than 30 U.S. cit­ies.

Con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors are still re­view­ing the activ­it­ies of ex­ist­ing Biowatch sensors, fol­low­ing an Au­gust call by House law­makers to as­sess pos­sible “ad­di­tion­al be­ne­fits” from any up­grade. The United States as of 2012 had spent $150 mil­lion to de­vel­op the next-gen­er­a­tion tech­no­logy, ac­cord­ing to the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×