Hillary Clinton: Edward Snowden’s Leaks Helped Terrorists

She is “puzzled” and found it “odd” that Snowden fled the country.

Hillary Clinton testifies on October 27, 2011.
National Journal
Emma Roller
April 25, 2014, 8:33 a.m.

Speak­ing at the Uni­versity of Con­necti­c­ut on Wed­nes­day night, Hil­lary Clin­ton made a re­strained but non­ethe­less damning at­tack against Ed­ward Snowden.

At the event, an in­ter­view­er asked Clin­ton wheth­er she thought the former Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency con­tract­or’s dis­clos­ures about its do­mest­ic spy­ing pro­grams had any pos­it­ive ef­fects on Amer­ic­an se­cur­ity policy or pub­lic dis­course.

Without ever ex­pli­citly men­tion­ing the NSA’s spy­ing pro­grams, Clin­ton jus­ti­fied their util­ity in pro­tect­ing the U.S. from an­oth­er ter­ror­ist at­tack in the wake of 9/11.

{{third­PartyEmbed type:you­tube id:B0F2piT­FjUo}}

“People were des­per­ate to avoid an­oth­er at­tack, and I saw enough in­tel­li­gence as a sen­at­or from New York, and then cer­tainly as sec­ret­ary [of State], that this is a con­stant — there are people right this minute try­ing to fig­ure out how to do harm to Amer­ic­ans and to oth­er in­no­cent people,” Clin­ton said. “So it was a de­bate that needs to hap­pen, so that we make sure that we’re not in­fringing on Amer­ic­ans’ pri­vacy, which is a val­ued, cher­ished per­son­al be­lief that we have. But we also had to fig­ure out how to get the right amount of se­cur­ity.”

As for Snowden’s role in ex­pos­ing the NSA pro­grams, Clin­ton in­sinu­ated that she found his motives sus­pi­cious.

“When he emerged and when he ab­sconded with all that ma­ter­i­al, I was puzzled be­cause we have all these pro­tec­tions for whistle-blowers. If he were con­cerned and wanted to be part of the Amer­ic­an de­bate, he could have been,” she said. “But it struck me as — I just have to be hon­est with you — as sort of odd that he would flee to China, be­cause Hong Kong is con­trolled by China, and that he would then go to Rus­sia — two coun­tries with which we have very dif­fi­cult cy­ber­re­la­tion­ships, to put it mildly.”

Let’s take a mo­ment to parse Clin­ton’s lan­guage here. She didn’t call Snowden a trait­or, or plainly say that him leav­ing the coun­try made her sus­pi­cious. In Amer­ic­an polit­ics, it’s nev­er good to come right out and ac­cuse someone of wrong­do­ing — you can just say you’re “con­fused” or “puzzled” by their ac­tions. In the same way, “odd” or “strange” of­ten serve as se­mant­ic place­hold­ers for “bad.” Just ask Rep. Paul Ry­an, who ab­ruptly ended a tele­vi­sion in­ter­view in 2012 after an un­wel­come re­mark about tax cuts, then told his in­ter­view­er, “That was kind of strange. You try­ing to stuff words in people’s mouths?”

Clin­ton stressed the strange­ness of Snowden’s de­cision to flee to coun­tries that have per­pet­rated cy­ber­at­tacks against the U.S. She noted that when State De­part­ment of­fi­cials would travel to Rus­sia or China on dip­lo­mat­ic busi­ness, they would leave their cell phones aboard the plane with their bat­ter­ies taken out. “It’s not like the only gov­ern­ment in the world do­ing any­thing is the United States,” she said.

“I think turn­ing over a lot of that ma­ter­i­al — in­ten­tion­ally or un­in­ten­tion­ally — drained, gave all kinds of in­form­a­tion, not only to big coun­tries, but to net­works and ter­ror­ist groups and the like. So I have a hard time think­ing that some­body who is a cham­pi­on of pri­vacy and liberty has taken refuge in Rus­sia, un­der Putin’s au­thor­ity.”

With sar­casm creep­ing in­to her voice, Clin­ton im­plied that Snowden ac­ted all too friendly to­ward Vladi­mir Putin, whose coun­try has been har­bor­ing Snowden since last Au­gust.

“And then he calls in to a Putin talk show and says, ‘Pres­id­ent Putin, do you spy on people?’ And Pres­id­ent Putin says, ‘Well, from one in­tel­li­gence pro­fes­sion­al to an­oth­er, of course not.’ ‘Oh, thank you so much!’ I mean really. I don’t know, I have a hard time fol­low­ing it.”

It will be in­ter­est­ing to con­trast Clin­ton’s re­marks with Sen. Rand Paul’s when he speaks at Har­vard Uni­versity on Fri­day af­ter­noon. In all like­li­hood, he’ll re­hash the same jokes he made when he spoke at Berke­ley in March about the NSA listen­ing in on his cell-phone con­ver­sa­tions. Mean­while, Bill Clin­ton has called Snowden an “im­per­fect mes­sen­ger” for bring­ing the de­bate about pri­vacy versus na­tion­al se­cur­ity to the fore.

Both Hil­lary Clin­ton and Paul are try­ing to win over col­lege stu­dents to their philo­sophy. If ap­plause decibels are any in­dic­a­tion, though, stu­dents fa­vor li­on­iz­ing the whistle-blower over sham­ing him.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4906) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×