Auditors Defend Pentagon for Skipping Bids on B-2 Upgrades

None

A U.S. B-2 strategic bomber taxis down a runway in 2005 at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. The Government Accountability office backed a Pentagon decision not to pursue a competitive process for planned updates to B-2 bombers.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
See more stories about...
Diane Barnes
April 23, 2014, 10:50 a.m.

Con­gres­sion­al in­vest­ig­at­ors said the De­fense De­part­ment was right to skip a com­pet­it­ive pro­cess for planned up­dates to B-2 stra­tegic bombers.

Tech­no­lo­gies to up­date the nuc­le­ar-cap­able air­craft were already far along in their de­vel­op­ment, and Pentagon data re­veals little room to save money by so­li­cit­ing more pro­pos­als from com­pan­ies, uni­versit­ies or agen­cies, ac­cord­ing to a Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice ana­lys­is is­sued on Tues­day.

The planned up­grades fo­cus on the air­plane’s “de­fens­ive man­age­ment sys­tem,” de­signed to track en­emy radar and alert crew mem­bers to pos­sible threats, ac­cord­ing to the GAO as­sess­ment.

The De­fense De­part­ment in­formed le­gis­lat­ive aud­it­ors in Decem­ber of its in­ten­tion not to pur­sue “com­pet­it­ive pro­to­typ­ing” for cer­tain up­grades planned for the B-2 sys­tem, the re­port in­dic­ates. A 2009 law re­quires le­gis­lat­ive aud­it­ors to scru­tin­ize any De­fense De­part­ment de­cision to skip the pro­cess, which can some­times re­duce ex­penses and the like­li­hood of tech­nic­al prob­lems, the doc­u­ment in­dic­ates.

The find­ings note that prime con­tract­or Northrop Grum­man ac­cep­ted bids from oth­er firms as it hired sub­con­tract­ors for the B-2 pro­ject.

De­velopers would make use of “ex­ist­ing, tech­nic­ally ma­ture sub­sys­tems” for two of the up­grade pro­ject’s three main com­pon­ents, and Northrop Grum­man used a com­pet­it­ive pro­to­typ­ing pro­cess to de­vel­op new an­ten­nas for the air­plane, au­thors of the GAO study said.

The Air Force re­viewed four “pro­to­typ­ing op­tions” and de­term­ined they “would in­crease the pro­gram’s de­vel­op­ment costs by between $28.2 mil­lion and $524.8 mil­lion [in base year 2011 dol­lars] de­pend­ing on the type and num­ber of pro­to­types,” the re­port states.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
17 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×