Congressional auditors said a planned safety component for processing highly enriched uranium failed in recent trials, the Knoxville News Sentinel reports.
The still-unbuilt Uranium Processing Facility, or “UPF” for short, was expected to use an insulating material in casting operations. However, project participants are now looking to find either an alternative insulator or another means of meeting the associated safety requirement, according to a Government Accountability Office report published on Friday.
“According to UPF contractor representatives, this risk is now the project’s most significant technological risk,” GAO officials said of the component, which was intended for use at a site tentatively slated for construction at the Y-12 National Security Complex in Tennessee.
The report airs separate concerns about a microwave uranium-casting system it says has not been adequately tested. It also says budgeting choices resulted in seven out of 19 key technology projects being unfunded in fiscal 2014.
The Energy Department’s National Nuclear Security Administration is responding to three of the assessment’s five concerns, and forthcoming actions might address the remaining issues, according to the document.
GAO auditors said the technology concerns could remain important even if policymakers decide to pursue another project in the uranium site’s place. Officials began examining other options for meeting the Y-12 facility’s uranium needs after UPF preparations hit numerous schedule and cost overruns.
Officials at the semi-autonomous nuclear agency are “reevaluating the UPF project and may decide to construct a facility that is smaller and contains only select enriched uranium-processing capabilities,” the congressional watchdog organization wrote.
“Whether NNSA continues with the UPF project or chooses to undertake a smaller project, the facility will likely cost billions of dollars, and its ability to meet critical national security needs will depend on successful development and deployment of new technologies,” the GAO report states.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.